Archives – 2004 – March – 10  

wive$watch
Read post
— 10 Mar 2004 mark sinker Comment

wive$watch:
if you had any gumption you switched over to bbc2[…]

So last night in Hustle the gang organised a complex art scam
Read post
— 10 Mar 2004 Pete Baran Comment

So last night in Hustle the gang organised a complex art scam which involved them getting a master forger to invent a new Mondrian which they could pass off as the real thing briefly to a sharp tongued art expert. To do this they had to steal an actu[…]

Image

All Bar One Rox ur all etc
Read post
— 10 Mar 2004 mark sinker Comment

All Bar One Rox ur all etc
I was about to post this when Tom’s original Firkin comment appeared and then cz I’d got so bolshy defending Pret against the ruralpolitans sane universe I hung fire, at least to read properly where the argument[…]

The conversation about pub chains got me thinking about when a chain is not a chain?
Read post
— 10 Mar 2004 Pete Baran 3 comments

The conversation about pub chains got me thinking about when a chain is not a chain? Or at least do we consider Sam Smiths pubs to be a chain? We talk about them as if they are, and there are definite aspects of their pubs with which one can happily […]

Latest comments on FT

  3. Three parts of this book stood out to me. The first being the Five Bar Gate issue. The Death of…