NEW ORDER — Technique

— 30 Jul 2004 Ned Raggett Comment

NEW ORDER — Technique

I actually posted this all over on ILM but I couldn’t decide whether here or there was the best place to put it. So I split the difference.

Previous post

POP THE VOTE activists deplore ROCKIST PRESENTATIONAL ADVICE

Next post

Beware the floating eye

Subscribe

Name*

Email

Website

Name*

Email

Website

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Latest comments on FT

Stephen Bolhafner on Aard Labour 16: The Last Day21 Apr 2024
"Dave Sim sticks the landing." That is my feeling too. As frustrating and borderline unreadable as the last 50 issues…
Stephen Bolhafner on Aard Labour 15: Latter Days21 Apr 2024
One thing I think you missed and one thing I have to shamefacedly admit: 1) The Krazy Kat homage, brief…
Stephen Bolhafner on Aard Labour 10: Minds21 Apr 2024
" ... it’s also an ominous indication of where he’s going as a creator. He’s laying out dialogue so as…
Stephen Bolhafner on Aard Labour 7: Flight21 Apr 2024
LOL - I'm reading through these, and the "Jaka's Story" one drew my first reaction, and in it I said…
Stephen Bolhafner on Aard Labour 5: Jaka’s Story20 Apr 2024
I think the notion that conservatives can't make art is nonsense. J.R.R.Tolkien and G.K. Chesterton are two of my favorite…
James Moar on Aard Labour Conclusion: Unmourned And Unloved19 Apr 2024
I think part of the problem is that, even if the prose is as good as the comic, the switch…
Tom on Aard Labour Conclusion: Unmourned And Unloved19 Apr 2024
I can’t think of one offhand (I don’t mind the HTD issue but I’d never read it a second time)…
Nisseman on Aard Labour Conclusion: Unmourned And Unloved19 Apr 2024
Is there any comicbook, where having large amounts of prose passages ever worked? I really hated that fill-in issue of…

0

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x

()