Popular
3 July 2009
#525, 13th August 1983
At first listen - and honestly at tenth listen - “Give It Up” seems like another disco carriage clock hit: thanks for all the hard work boys, now have a number one. On the other hand, if you want a splashy summer hit you could do far worse - this is a little rigid and lacking in bottom end perhaps, but full of bright carnival touches. It’s a marvellously airy record - good (as I’ve discovered this week) for clearing the head on a muggy day. The production aesthetic is “salad of all the trebles” - buzzy synths, high rhythm guitar, falsetto and brass all hustling for prominence. KC himself isn’t the intense central presence he was on “Please Don’t Go” - he’s upstaged by the backing singers, whose “Nana-nana-nanananananaNOW!” is the song’s most delightful (and enduring) element.
Tom • FT/ Pop/ Popular • 14 Comments
29 June 2009
#524, 23rd July 1983, video
In the mid-90s I worked in the Music And Video Exchange chain in Notting Hill Gate. Paul Young’s No Parlez holds a special place in my affections from those years - not because we ever knowingly played it, but because it was the undisputed number one landfill vinyl “penny each for these, mate” champ. Browsing the 20p albums down in that malodorous Pembridge Road basement, it seemed like every fourth flick would bring you face to face with Paul’s teased-up hair, quizzical expression and sweaty leather suit. more »
Tom • FT/ Pop/ Popular • 47 Comments
24 June 2009
#523, 2nd July 1983, video
A blowsy wreck of a single, this, keys and sax and guitar and Rod all fighting for the same earspace over an aggressively chuntering rhythm. What you really notice is how one-note and shot Stewart sounds - his great strength as a vocalist, that way he could lead you into a story, completely gone. Though even if he did still have the power to turn “Baby Jane” into something that might intrigue you, that clunking chorus would kill the momentum anyway.
Tom • FT/ Pop/ Popular • 32 Comments
22 June 2009
#522, 4th June 1983, video
I guess the mid-paced slog of a rhythm which dominates “Every Breath You Take” is meant to suggest its narrator’s implacability - the unresting patience of a stalker. Rock is a generally lively medium though and it takes some craft to build a “classic song” out of stony resolution, so credit to Sting and crew for that much at least. It must have been quickly obvious that “Every Breath” was going to be with us for a lifetime, a grey new fixture in the hall of fame. more »
Tom • FT/ Pop/ Popular • 34 Comments
19 June 2009
#521, 28th May 1983, video
“Candy Girl” is one of those irritating records that I feel I ought to like more than I do. Certainly within the schema of Popular it should be a pretty ‘important’ single - it’s the first number one with rapping on, for goodness’ sakes. The only problem is that Maurice Starr’s use of the old Jackson 5 playbook is so flagrant and calculated it overshadows anything else going on in the track. more »
Tom • FT/ Pop/ Popular • 28 Comments
12 June 2009
#520, 30th April 1983, video
The effect of “True” - potent for some, emetic for others - is a function of how it rubs two impulses up against each other. One is a yearning for depth and the authentic, in the form of soul music. The other is a wish to make your records gleam, to emphasise their sleekness and luxury. Understand this combination and you understand pop in the mid-80s. On the one hand, “You are Gold!” On the other, “Always believe in your soul!” more »
Tom • FT/ Pop/ Popular • 65 Comments
27 May 2009
#519, 9th April 1983
One of the odd things about Bowie is how panicky he seems to get when he’s in fashion. The image of him as a “pop chameleon” is surely at least partly cover for a flight-reflex that kicks in when one of his stylistic changes really takes off. In the mid 70s, tasting superstardom on the back of his deviant glam image, he sidestepped into black US pop, making Young Americans and baffling his fans with “plastic soul”. Close to a decade on, and again the fountainhead of art-pop influence, he made exactly the same move, borrowing sounds and musicians from black pop to make a record that’s an exercise in knowing glossiness. more »
Tom • FT/ Pop/ Popular • 128 Comments
24 May 2009
Quick poll time:

Loading ...
(The first two categories are designed to separate people who want the videos as part of the “package” of the song being discussed, and people who just want a way to hear the song. i.e. with the latter option we’d include embedded clips all the way back to Al Martino if we could find ‘em.)
Tom • FT/ Popular • 29 Comments
22 May 2009
#518, 26th March 1983
“Is There Something” - released between albums to maximise chart returns - is by no means Duran Duran’s finest moment. The chorus is a chant in search of a hook, and the shamefully half-hearted middle eight is a collection of atmospheric blurts in search of an editor. It’s also - one notorious line aside - the least exciting of Duran’s mid-period hits. It lacks the gleeful absurdity of “Rio”, the sleaze of “Union Of The Snake”, the shameless drive of “Hungry Like The Wolf”. more »
Tom • FT/ Pop/ Popular • 66 Comments
20 May 2009
#517, 12th March 1983
Pop repeats itself first as the sublime then as the ridiculous. “Total Eclipse Of The Heart” - especially when you watch the gauzy video - comes across as a big budget remake of Kate Bush’s “Wuthering Heights”. Pianos, crescendos, abstraction, abjection. But bigger isn’t always better.
Or isn’t it? Jim Steinman is pomp rock’s master of scale: why settle for a delicate bas-relief when you could have Mount Rushmore every time? more »
Tom • FT/ Pop/ Popular • 87 Comments
« Older