Sep 08

ART GARFUNKEL – “Bright Eyes”

FT + Popular77 comments • 6,211 views

#436, 14th April 1979

Who wrote “Bright Eyes”, and why they wrote it, I don’t care. I know, but I don’t care. You can talk about all that stuff Because all “Bright Eyes” means for me is this:

Sorry about the glutinous string arrangement there, which completely destroys the fragility of Art’s original, but it’s the visuals that matter. This, good people, is why the rabbit is the most terrifying animal in pop: those swirling sun-rabbits, those warping and distoring pylons, and most of all the Black Rabbit and his red eyes and weird totem-mask ears.

As a fairly precocious child I had already read Watership Down before the film came to a local village hall, maybe a year or so after this single hit number one. I was very eager to see it, because I loved the book: there were bits in it I found scary, the vicious rabbits of the Efrafa warren for instance, but the film was a cartoon, and how frightening could cartoons be? More fool me: I still get chills when I see the sequence above but it’s nothing – nothing – compared to the warren destruction, with the crushed blinded rabbits dying in claustrophobic fear. I am not a great fan of horror films, but nothing I have ever seen in the cinema has been as terrifying as Watership Down. And when I try to imagine the horror of warfare or plague, what my mind reaches for is pale circles of dead rabbits.

The amazing thing about “Bright Eyes” the song is that it actually manages to live up to my terrified imaginings – Art’s lovely, strung-out vocal managing to sound like the graceful, fatal will-o-wisp of the film’s Black Rabbit, the vision you chase even though you know where it is leading you to: “following the river of death downstream”, what a great line, or at least it becomes one with Art singing it with that slight beckon in his voice. The power is all in the verses, though – the chorus of “Bright Eyes” is too big, too strong, too arranged to sustain their wan intensity. It turns the track into, well, a pop song, gives it the safety and resolution of closing credits and lights coming up. But the verses are a shadow glimpsed jumping across the setting sun.



1 2 3 All
  1. 61
    Mark G on 10 Jan 2011 #

    Everyone thought it was Sparks when it first came out.

  2. 62
    punctum on 10 Jan 2011 #

    I didn’t.

  3. 63
    vinylscot on 10 Jan 2011 #

    Neither did I, and I don’t remember anyone else thinking that. It really doesn’t sound much like them at all.

  4. 64
    pink champale on 10 Jan 2011 #

    nice site billy. i really liked you piece on ‘say hello wave goodbye’ which made me think at lot as i’ve never heard the song that way *at all*. from the lyrics on the page i can’t fault your analysis one bit, but listening to the song, i don’t hear sneering sarcasm, i hear marc tearing his heart out. to me he doesn’t sound smug about finding a nice little housewife and a steady life, he sounds utterly distraught – that bit, with the wavering synth wash rising up behind him is one of the most beautiful moments in pop music. i hear the song as someone steeling himself to do a terrible thing (all the stuff about what a mess she is him desperately trying to convince himself) for the sake of..what, i dunno – respectability, his career? ( the nation? there’s definitely a touch of hal and falstaff). so yeah, selfish maybe, but not callous – just listen to that terrible moment of hesitation in “we’re strangers meeting for the first time…okay?”. what a song.

  5. 65
    Billy Smart on 11 Jan 2011 #

    Well thank you very much, Champale! I’ve replied to your thoughts about ‘Say Hello’ on the ‘Tainted Love’ thread, where I thought it would fit in better.

  6. 66
    Billy Smart on 17 Jan 2011 #

    Perhaps Mike Batt’s greatest hit; http://drunkennessofthingsbeingvarious.blogspot.com/2011/01/wombles-remember-youre-womble-1974-no-3.html

  7. 67
    Mark G on 17 Jan 2011 #

    I’d have said “Superwomble”, but that would be mainly for the Chris Spedding solo…

  8. 68
    Brendan on 26 Sep 2012 #

    Again Tom nails my own thoughts even before I’ve tried to figure out what they are. The verses are quite sublime, as one might expect from one of the most beautiful voices ever (cf For Emily (Wherever I May Find Her)) but the chorus is one of those godawful sing-alongs that you’d expect to hear sung by a football crowd or a Celine/Mariah/Whitney type singer, truly dreadful even if Art’s voice does at least lessen the ill-effect somewhat. I would agree it’s a 6.

    Incidentally, I read the book a few years later and it has been one of my favourites ever since and I thought the film worked well for the most part.

  9. 69
    Tom on 26 Sep 2012 #

    I need to put the video link back in here or my write up makes little sense!

  10. 70
    enitharmon on 26 Sep 2012 #

    @68, now if you worked in horticulture you wouldn’t have any sympathy at all with a story about heroic rabbits. Stoats, yes. Badgers, certainly (damn the dairy farmers and their old wives tales), but not rabbits which are an invasive species in more senses than one (they burrow up into the polytunnels and scoff the lot!)

  11. 71
    Brendan on 26 Sep 2012 #

    I think the point of the book was that it could be about any species even humans. It’s all about the journey innit? I’m betting Simon Cowell was a fan.

  12. 72
    a tanned rested and unlogged lørd sükråt wötsît on 27 Sep 2012 #

    Has anyone ever met anyone who reread Shardik?

  13. 73
    Tom on 27 Sep 2012 #

    No. I have however met many people who re-read SHAKO! http://www.comicvine.com/shako/29-53956/

  14. 74
    Brendan on 27 Sep 2012 #

    #72 I hadn’t even heard of it till you mentioned it tbh. I have got The Plague Dogs but I never got round to reading it. Maybe enitharmon was right and it was just the cute bunnies that did it for me.

  15. 75
    thefatgit on 18 Dec 2012 #

    Watership Down was deemed so important by our teacher, that the whole class went to see it at our local cinema. The book we had been reading in class was marvellous. The film was…different, to put it diplomatically. A group of kids emerged from the cinema somewhat disturbed and troubled by what they had seen, including myself. The visual imagery played alongside that of Pat Mills’ excellent “Charley’s War” from “Battle” (which I started to read faithfully from the beginning of that year). So the horror of the trenches and the gassing of the warren actually became totally fused in my brain at that point. I remember asking in class if there were similarities between the rabbits and the Tommies in the trenches, which I knew nobody else had picked up on. The song was a trigger for some nightmarish thoughts at that time. Art Garfunkel’s lilting and distant voice, almost out of reach, lead me towards a pretty horrific landscape. If I had been but a few years younger, I’d have been totally fucked up by the whole experience. Probably the scariest #1 ever.

  16. 76
    swanstep on 18 Dec 2012 #

    @thefatgit. My youngest brother was 7 when he was dragged along to see WS with our whole family. He was pretty upset by it, so that he *still* talks about the experience, at least now that he has a 4 year old son (so that what to let kids watch and where are pressing issues again for him).

  17. 77
    Gareth Parker on 8 May 2021 #

    I can’t really hate this, but a bit of a dirge for me, so I still would only go with a 3/10 here. Sorry Art.

1 2 3 All

Add your comment

(Register to guarantee your comments don't get marked as spam.)

If this was number 1 when you were born paste [stork-boy] or [stork-girl] into the start of your comment :)


Required (Your email address will not be published)

Top of page