<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Populist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:37:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: a few quick links &#171; echo&#38;sway</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-813731</link>
		<dc:creator>a few quick links &#171; echo&#38;sway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 04:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-813731</guid>
		<description>[...]  Everyone already knows that Tom Ewing&#8217;s Popular, his rundown of the complete history of the UK #1 singles, is a must-read, but his latest post (the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Everyone already knows that Tom Ewing&#8217;s Popular, his rundown of the complete history of the UK #1 singles, is a must-read, but his latest post (the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-783755</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-783755</guid>
		<description>It was a 5 (and it had lost it&#039;s date and order number too, weird.

(possibly it never had them from the time I got Tom to put the data into special fields instead of in the article)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a 5 (and it had lost it&#8217;s date and order number too, weird.</p>
<p>(possibly it never had them from the time I got Tom to put the data into special fields instead of in the article)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-783753</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-783753</guid>
		<description>!! the procol article has lost its score is what&#039;s happened.

(there are many popular posts that aren&#039;t actual #1 entries, so the list only shows those with valid score and dates)

unless Tom can remember the score he gave (!)  i will have to dig through the database archives to see what it was before whichever accidental data trickery lost us that :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>!! the procol article has lost its score is what&#8217;s happened.</p>
<p>(there are many popular posts that aren&#8217;t actual #1 entries, so the list only shows those with valid score and dates)</p>
<p>unless Tom can remember the score he gave (!)  i will have to dig through the database archives to see what it was before whichever accidental data trickery lost us that :-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swanstep</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-782329</link>
		<dc:creator>swanstep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-782329</guid>
		<description>@mark m, 58. Thanks for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mark m, 58. Thanks for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark M</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-782315</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-782315</guid>
		<description>Re 56: It&#039;s disappeared from the list, but the piece is still there – http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2006/05/procul-harum-a-whiter-shade-of-pale/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re 56: It&#8217;s disappeared from the list, but the piece is still there – <a href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2006/05/procul-harum-a-whiter-shade-of-pale/" rel="nofollow">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2006/05/procul-harum-a-whiter-shade-of-pale/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DietMondrian</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-782185</link>
		<dc:creator>DietMondrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-782185</guid>
		<description>By my reckoning the greatest difference in FT reader scores for number ones by any one artist is 7.4 for Kate Bush - 9.00 for Wuthering Heights and 1.6 for Let It Be (Ferry Aid).

If appearances in charity conglomerations don&#039;t count, it&#039;s Mick Jagger with 6.07 - Paint It, Black (8.6) minus Dancing in the Street (2.53).

If you discount all charity records it&#039;s Paul McCartney with 6.01 - Eleanor Rigby/Yellow Submarine (8.92) minus Ebony and Ivory (2.91).

Does this tell us anything other than that charity records aren&#039;t much cop and that McCartney&#039;s quality control isn&#039;t great, which we knew anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By my reckoning the greatest difference in FT reader scores for number ones by any one artist is 7.4 for Kate Bush &#8211; 9.00 for Wuthering Heights and 1.6 for Let It Be (Ferry Aid).</p>
<p>If appearances in charity conglomerations don&#8217;t count, it&#8217;s Mick Jagger with 6.07 &#8211; Paint It, Black (8.6) minus Dancing in the Street (2.53).</p>
<p>If you discount all charity records it&#8217;s Paul McCartney with 6.01 &#8211; Eleanor Rigby/Yellow Submarine (8.92) minus Ebony and Ivory (2.91).</p>
<p>Does this tell us anything other than that charity records aren&#8217;t much cop and that McCartney&#8217;s quality control isn&#8217;t great, which we knew anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swanstep</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-782184</link>
		<dc:creator>swanstep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-782184</guid>
		<description>So, seriously, what&#039;s going on with the Whiter Shade entry? Its comment thread had some Doors discussion in it IIRC...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, seriously, what&#8217;s going on with the Whiter Shade entry? Its comment thread had some Doors discussion in it IIRC&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erithian</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-782155</link>
		<dc:creator>Erithian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-782155</guid>
		<description>There is no reason and the truth is plain to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no reason and the truth is plain to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Hicks</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-782035</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Hicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-782035</guid>
		<description>Procul Harum&#039;s &#039;A Whiter Shade of Pale&#039; has vanished for me on this list, for some reason...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Procul Harum&#8217;s &#8216;A Whiter Shade of Pale&#8217; has vanished for me on this list, for some reason&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan not logged in</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-725334</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan not logged in</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-725334</guid>
		<description>I am this close ][ to doing little google graph charts of the vote distribution for each title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am this close ][ to doing little google graph charts of the vote distribution for each title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conrad</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-725305</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-725305</guid>
		<description>Donna still has quite a substantial lead on the competition at the top. Be interesting to see what, if anything, will overtake it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donna still has quite a substantial lead on the competition at the top. Be interesting to see what, if anything, will overtake it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-674705</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-674705</guid>
		<description>Wow, that was quick! Ta very much. What an entertaining roll call of drivel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that was quick! Ta very much. What an entertaining roll call of drivel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-674630</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-674630</guid>
		<description>It will take quite a bad record to shift that one I think. Or a sudden surge in wuv for St Wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will take quite a bad record to shift that one I think. Or a sudden surge in wuv for St Wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-674622</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-674622</guid>
		<description>i spoil you i really do.

i wasn&#039;t sure what to do about the numbering, but the 100th is the worst (as you can see from the score). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i spoil you i really do.</p>
<p>i wasn&#8217;t sure what to do about the numbering, but the 100th is the worst (as you can see from the score).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-674617</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-674617</guid>
		<description>Can we have an Unpopulist as well? On the readers&#039; scores? The bottom 20 or 50 would satisfy curiosity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we have an Unpopulist as well? On the readers&#8217; scores? The bottom 20 or 50 would satisfy curiosity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654814</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654814</guid>
		<description>I have been parsing away for about an hour. Lovely stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been parsing away for about an hour. Lovely stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654775</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654775</guid>
		<description>Tom, i&#039;ve sent a 40K tab file to freakytrigger gmail. it&#039;s pop_no, post_title and scores.

the scores column has individual scores comma separated. if i get you right, you&#039;re just after the average score, so i could have just given you the ave score, but i figured you might want to go wild on the stats, so you could get #of10 scores, #of9 scores, etc, and all manner of statpr0n.

if you can&#039;t parse the data and you&#039;d rather just have the ave, let me know.

quick fact: Come On Eileen has the highest number of votes by some distance.

(i have deleted all user ID info, so the scoring given in the file is anonymous BTW.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, i&#8217;ve sent a 40K tab file to freakytrigger gmail. it&#8217;s pop_no, post_title and scores.</p>
<p>the scores column has individual scores comma separated. if i get you right, you&#8217;re just after the average score, so i could have just given you the ave score, but i figured you might want to go wild on the stats, so you could get #of10 scores, #of9 scores, etc, and all manner of statpr0n.</p>
<p>if you can&#8217;t parse the data and you&#8217;d rather just have the ave, let me know.</p>
<p>quick fact: Come On Eileen has the highest number of votes by some distance.</p>
<p>(i have deleted all user ID info, so the scoring given in the file is anonymous BTW.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654752</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654752</guid>
		<description>I was doing a little playing around w/my scores today, having set up a better excel file for them (NON-NERDS LOOK AWAY). I wanted to answer the qn: what is the best run of #1 hits?

My answer (so far at least), if you take a 10-song average, is the stretch which starts inauspiciously with Boney M&#039;s &quot;Mary&#039;s Boy Child&quot; and runs until &quot;Are &#039;Friends&#039; Electric&quot; (#430-439).

But, if you look at my best ERA for pop - defined as a 50-song average - it&#039;s #171-#220 - starting with Roy Orbison&#039;s &quot;It&#039;s Over&quot; and ending with Chris Farlowe&#039;s &quot;Out Of Time&quot; - so mid-64 to mid-66.

I want to do this with the reader marks and will pester the relevant ppl for a .csv file :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was doing a little playing around w/my scores today, having set up a better excel file for them (NON-NERDS LOOK AWAY). I wanted to answer the qn: what is the best run of #1 hits?</p>
<p>My answer (so far at least), if you take a 10-song average, is the stretch which starts inauspiciously with Boney M&#8217;s &#8220;Mary&#8217;s Boy Child&#8221; and runs until &#8220;Are &#8216;Friends&#8217; Electric&#8221; (#430-439).</p>
<p>But, if you look at my best ERA for pop &#8211; defined as a 50-song average &#8211; it&#8217;s #171-#220 &#8211; starting with Roy Orbison&#8217;s &#8220;It&#8217;s Over&#8221; and ending with Chris Farlowe&#8217;s &#8220;Out Of Time&#8221; &#8211; so mid-64 to mid-66.</p>
<p>I want to do this with the reader marks and will pester the relevant ppl for a .csv file :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654280</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654280</guid>
		<description>Cool, thanks Alan!

What I think I&#039;ll do is frontpage it for a day or two so the regulars all see it, then it can be plunged back into the Mud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, thanks Alan!</p>
<p>What I think I&#8217;ll do is frontpage it for a day or two so the regulars all see it, then it can be plunged back into the Mud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654230</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654230</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ll put up &#039;74 later on then if you like? it&#039;s also a matter of bringing it to the attention of the crew. i guess by a comment on that (back in time) post and on the most recent popular post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ll put up &#8217;74 later on then if you like? it&#8217;s also a matter of bringing it to the attention of the crew. i guess by a comment on that (back in time) post and on the most recent popular post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654225</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654225</guid>
		<description>Today would be a good day to put one up - though I&#039;m too busy even to do a poll at the moment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today would be a good day to put one up &#8211; though I&#8217;m too busy even to do a poll at the moment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654207</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654207</guid>
		<description>it won&#039;t take a lot to set them up - but it&#039;s Tom&#039;s call. He was setting up the old ones as a way to take up comment crew slack when he&#039;s busy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it won&#8217;t take a lot to set them up &#8211; but it&#8217;s Tom&#8217;s call. He was setting up the old ones as a way to take up comment crew slack when he&#8217;s busy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enitharmon</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654206</link>
		<dc:creator>enitharmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654206</guid>
		<description>So, are we ever going to be able to vote in the outstanding year polls?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, are we ever going to be able to vote in the outstanding year polls?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654199</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654199</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ve just tagged up the 14 &#039;year-poll&#039; posts with &#039;popular year poll&#039; so they appear here:

http://freakytrigger.co.uk/tag/popular-year-poll/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve just tagged up the 14 &#8216;year-poll&#8217; posts with &#8216;popular year poll&#8217; so they appear here:</p>
<p><a href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/tag/popular-year-poll/" rel="nofollow">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/tag/popular-year-poll/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ottersteve</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654051</link>
		<dc:creator>ottersteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 11:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/populist/#comment-654051</guid>
		<description>Tom.
Re your comment at 35. Your end of each year chart is a great idea, but not all of the years seem to have this feature. I&#039;d love to see all years accounted for as I enjoy putting my ten pen&#039;th in.

On the subject of the readers poll. I suspect that many of the voters have been swayed by your wise words on a few of the songs. It&#039;s my guess that&#039;s because many readers were simply too young or not even born when certain (high-ranked, on the above chart) tracks were at No.1

I was fortunate to be around to fully enjoy the 60&#039;s &quot;pop boom&quot; and I believe most Beatles fans would not put down Yellow Submarine/Eleanor Rigby as the best of the Beatles No.1&#039;s. For me, personally, &quot;She Loves you&quot; was the true trigger of the wave of musical euphoria that swept the country at that time (I was 9 years old). Hey Jude comes a close 2nd for me. If you had given a high score of your own to these tracks - I&#039;m convinced they would have been in the readers top 10 too.

Just an observation - not taking it all TOO seriously.
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom.<br />
Re your comment at 35. Your end of each year chart is a great idea, but not all of the years seem to have this feature. I&#8217;d love to see all years accounted for as I enjoy putting my ten pen&#8217;th in.</p>
<p>On the subject of the readers poll. I suspect that many of the voters have been swayed by your wise words on a few of the songs. It&#8217;s my guess that&#8217;s because many readers were simply too young or not even born when certain (high-ranked, on the above chart) tracks were at No.1</p>
<p>I was fortunate to be around to fully enjoy the 60&#8242;s &#8220;pop boom&#8221; and I believe most Beatles fans would not put down Yellow Submarine/Eleanor Rigby as the best of the Beatles No.1&#8242;s. For me, personally, &#8220;She Loves you&#8221; was the true trigger of the wave of musical euphoria that swept the country at that time (I was 9 years old). Hey Jude comes a close 2nd for me. If you had given a high score of your own to these tracks &#8211; I&#8217;m convinced they would have been in the readers top 10 too.</p>
<p>Just an observation &#8211; not taking it all TOO seriously.<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

