<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE BEATLES - &#8220;Paperback Writer&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Casino</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-568647</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Casino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-568647</guid>
		<description>Got to be one of my favorite Beatle singles - leaps out of the speaker more than almost anything else they recorded.  Just a great rocker, dense with hooks and McCartney's voice is in top shape here.  8 or 9 is probably right, I mean, this thing won't change the world or anything but damn is it COOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got to be one of my favorite Beatle singles - leaps out of the speaker more than almost anything else they recorded.  Just a great rocker, dense with hooks and McCartney&#8217;s voice is in top shape here.  8 or 9 is probably right, I mean, this thing won&#8217;t change the world or anything but damn is it COOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petesmith</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-22739</link>
		<dc:creator>petesmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-22739</guid>
		<description>marcello - what did "rain" ever do to you? it totally deserves its rep! and "paperback writer," while seemingly throwaway, does ride a pretty catchy riff, and actually rocks sort of hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marcello - what did &#8220;rain&#8221; ever do to you? it totally deserves its rep! and &#8220;paperback writer,&#8221; while seemingly throwaway, does ride a pretty catchy riff, and actually rocks sort of hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lena</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-22738</link>
		<dc:creator>Lena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-22738</guid>
		<description>This song is meta, I'm sure, but there's good &#038; bad meta and this sounds too much like someone playing the &lt;I&gt;idea&lt;/I&gt; of the Beatles, the way instant mashed potatoes are 'like' mashed potatoes; yeah, yeah, but not really.  I don't know, I just don't find it very funny...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This song is meta, I&#8217;m sure, but there&#8217;s good &#038; bad meta and this sounds too much like someone playing the <i>idea</i> of the Beatles, the way instant mashed potatoes are &#8216;like&#8217; mashed potatoes; yeah, yeah, but not really.  I don&#8217;t know, I just don&#8217;t find it very funny&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Hickey</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-22737</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Hickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-22737</guid>
		<description>The backing vocals are definitely the Beatles 'doing' the Beach Boys - and specifically Sloop John B, which charted a couple of weeks before this was recorded, and which had an a capella break (very unusual for the time).&lt;BR/&gt;As for Beatles 'satire' (if that's the right word) there's quite a lot there, especially around this time - a lot of the songs from this period are similar to this. Norwegian Wood, Drive My Car, Taxman, Dr Robert...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The backing vocals are definitely the Beatles &#8216;doing&#8217; the Beach Boys - and specifically Sloop John B, which charted a couple of weeks before this was recorded, and which had an a capella break (very unusual for the time).<br />As for Beatles &#8217;satire&#8217; (if that&#8217;s the right word) there&#8217;s quite a lot there, especially around this time - a lot of the songs from this period are similar to this. Norwegian Wood, Drive My Car, Taxman, Dr Robert&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-22736</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-22736</guid>
		<description>Doctor Mod says,&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Now as to "Frere Jacques":&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Alan, I thought you'd lost your mind this time--but I pulled out the Past Masters 2 CD, put on the headphones, and nearly fell on the floor laughing!  I never really knew what that business was--and it's so absolutely incongrous that who'd imagine it--but it's as clear as a bell on the remastered disc.  &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Listening to it again (after a VERY long time), I now appreciate what a howl the vocals--if not the lyrics--actually are.  While the Beatles all had distinct voices, there are moments when it sounds as if McCartney is actually doing an impersonation of Lennon, and the falsettos sound like a mad send-up of the Beach Boys.  It's amazing, too, how much they sound like the disco-era Bee Gees, who profited massively from that (often nerve-wracking) sound a full decade later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doctor Mod says,</p>
<p>Now as to &#8220;Frere Jacques&#8221;:</p>
<p>Alan, I thought you&#8217;d lost your mind this time&#8211;but I pulled out the Past Masters 2 CD, put on the headphones, and nearly fell on the floor laughing!  I never really knew what that business was&#8211;and it&#8217;s so absolutely incongrous that who&#8217;d imagine it&#8211;but it&#8217;s as clear as a bell on the remastered disc.  </p>
<p>Listening to it again (after a VERY long time), I now appreciate what a howl the vocals&#8211;if not the lyrics&#8211;actually are.  While the Beatles all had distinct voices, there are moments when it sounds as if McCartney is actually doing an impersonation of Lennon, and the falsettos sound like a mad send-up of the Beach Boys.  It&#8217;s amazing, too, how much they sound like the disco-era Bee Gees, who profited massively from that (often nerve-wracking) sound a full decade later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-22735</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-22735</guid>
		<description>Doctor Mod says,&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;"Paperback Writer" and its b-side "Rain" are a watershed in the Beatles career--for better or worse, depending on one's preferences.  In the multi-volumed Beatles Anthology CD, there's a clip of the group performing PW in Japan--bloody awful, and they knew it.  By this time they'd started their audio experimentation--the vocals are multi-tracked, in quadruplicate, if I remember correctly--and thus they could no longer reproduce the sounds of their recordings live.  This, along with the stress of constant touring for nearly five years, ended their live performances, with the exception of those before a limited audience at the end of their collaboration  (e.g., "Hey Jude" and "Get Back").  &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I had recently been considering writing a book chapter on British pop satire from the 1960s to the 1990s.  Strange, but I'd somehow imagined that the Beatles were among the great rock satirists, but upon looking for examples I realized that satire wasn't really their strongest suit.  The Kinks and the Rolling Stones were far more adept when it came to it.  This is probably one of the more notable examples of Beatles satire, surprisingly written by McCartney.  (If one wants "Beatles" satire, one should look to Lennon's solo albums.  And yes, yes, I know--one could offer any number of examples, particularly from the White Album, but from a literary point of view, the satire is generally too obvious, too overdone, or not sufficiently sustained.)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;This is pretty good satire, though, and probably the most intelligent lyric McCartney ever wrote, inasmuch as it evinces his awareness of a world outside of the emotions--or, for that matter, himself.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Perhaps the most remarkable thing about this recording, though, is not simply the fact that this is such a radical departure from the group's previous singles, both lyrically and musically, but that it actually sold so well.  I'm not sure that my fellow fifteen-year-olds completely fathomed its meaning, but we were intrigued all the same.  (I didn't hurt that it had a great beat--who says Ringo Starr was not an incredible and innovative drummer?)  Still, I don't think that anyone but the Beatles could have taken such a song to the top of the charts, and I'd argue that it's compelling evidence of the extent to which they were near-absolute arbiters of style and taste at that time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doctor Mod says,</p>
<p>&#8220;Paperback Writer&#8221; and its b-side &#8220;Rain&#8221; are a watershed in the Beatles career&#8211;for better or worse, depending on one&#8217;s preferences.  In the multi-volumed Beatles Anthology CD, there&#8217;s a clip of the group performing PW in Japan&#8211;bloody awful, and they knew it.  By this time they&#8217;d started their audio experimentation&#8211;the vocals are multi-tracked, in quadruplicate, if I remember correctly&#8211;and thus they could no longer reproduce the sounds of their recordings live.  This, along with the stress of constant touring for nearly five years, ended their live performances, with the exception of those before a limited audience at the end of their collaboration  (e.g., &#8220;Hey Jude&#8221; and &#8220;Get Back&#8221;).  </p>
<p>I had recently been considering writing a book chapter on British pop satire from the 1960s to the 1990s.  Strange, but I&#8217;d somehow imagined that the Beatles were among the great rock satirists, but upon looking for examples I realized that satire wasn&#8217;t really their strongest suit.  The Kinks and the Rolling Stones were far more adept when it came to it.  This is probably one of the more notable examples of Beatles satire, surprisingly written by McCartney.  (If one wants &#8220;Beatles&#8221; satire, one should look to Lennon&#8217;s solo albums.  And yes, yes, I know&#8211;one could offer any number of examples, particularly from the White Album, but from a literary point of view, the satire is generally too obvious, too overdone, or not sufficiently sustained.)</p>
<p>This is pretty good satire, though, and probably the most intelligent lyric McCartney ever wrote, inasmuch as it evinces his awareness of a world outside of the emotions&#8211;or, for that matter, himself.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most remarkable thing about this recording, though, is not simply the fact that this is such a radical departure from the group&#8217;s previous singles, both lyrically and musically, but that it actually sold so well.  I&#8217;m not sure that my fellow fifteen-year-olds completely fathomed its meaning, but we were intrigued all the same.  (I didn&#8217;t hurt that it had a great beat&#8211;who says Ringo Starr was not an incredible and innovative drummer?)  Still, I don&#8217;t think that anyone but the Beatles could have taken such a song to the top of the charts, and I&#8217;d argue that it&#8217;s compelling evidence of the extent to which they were near-absolute arbiters of style and taste at that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Williams</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-22734</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-22734</guid>
		<description>One of my favourite Beatles songs too.  I suspect the lyrics are partly about the Beatles themselves, specifically the expectation that they would keep churning out the material, which of course they weren't interested in doing.  Especially at this time when they were going through their period of greatest change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my favourite Beatles songs too.  I suspect the lyrics are partly about the Beatles themselves, specifically the expectation that they would keep churning out the material, which of course they weren&#8217;t interested in doing.  Especially at this time when they were going through their period of greatest change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcello</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-22733</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-22733</guid>
		<description>probably one of my least favourite beatles songs, a smug pseudo-mod trifle with perhaps the most overrated b-side in pop history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>probably one of my least favourite beatles songs, a smug pseudo-mod trifle with perhaps the most overrated b-side in pop history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-22732</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-22732</guid>
		<description>Yay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Connor</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-22731</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/10/the-beatles-paperback-writer/#comment-22731</guid>
		<description>Oh, right. It's not a double-'A' side. Right.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;B&gt;Resurrection Watch&lt;/B&gt;: 10CC had a crack at this. likewise The Shadows, Herb Pederson, some guy called Paul McCartney, and -- of course -- Kris Kristofferson. As with other Beatles songs, soundtrack and advertising use is thin thin thin. Likewise, a fairly popular choice on those &lt;I&gt;Beatles Hits Go... [Latin] / [Moog]&lt;/I&gt; etc albums. And somehow, part of a Jive Bunny &#038; the Mastermixers medley.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;One of my favourites from the Red and Blue albums as a wean, probably because there's not only a story, but a a story where you have to fill in lots of gaps yourself. and one of my favourites as a nominal adult, for reasons I'd find harder to explain.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;The meta-hackwork idea fits pretty well with the piss-taking "Frere Jacques"es in the backing vox. Goes to show how reliable my ears are. I'd listened to the song over and over again, was told about the Frere Jacques, didn't believe it for a moment, and then went back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, right. It&#8217;s not a double-&#8217;A&#8217; side. Right.</p>
<p><b>Resurrection Watch</b>: 10CC had a crack at this. likewise The Shadows, Herb Pederson, some guy called Paul McCartney, and &#8212; of course &#8212; Kris Kristofferson. As with other Beatles songs, soundtrack and advertising use is thin thin thin. Likewise, a fairly popular choice on those <i>Beatles Hits Go&#8230; [Latin] / [Moog]</i> etc albums. And somehow, part of a Jive Bunny &#038; the Mastermixers medley.</p>
<p>One of my favourites from the Red and Blue albums as a wean, probably because there&#8217;s not only a story, but a a story where you have to fill in lots of gaps yourself. and one of my favourites as a nominal adult, for reasons I&#8217;d find harder to explain.</p>
<p>The meta-hackwork idea fits pretty well with the piss-taking &#8220;Frere Jacques&#8221;es in the backing vox. Goes to show how reliable my ears are. I&#8217;d listened to the song over and over again, was told about the Frere Jacques, didn&#8217;t believe it for a moment, and then went back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
