<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: KEN DODD - &#8220;Tears&#8221; / THE ROLLING STONES - &#8220;Get Off Of My Cloud&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-551036</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-551036</guid>
		<description>At the time I wrote this I was planning more double-header entries, whether linking or contrasting tracks. But partly as a consequence of the comments box becoming so important it seemed wiser to give everything its individual entry, so this one does stick out a bit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the time I wrote this I was planning more double-header entries, whether linking or contrasting tracks. But partly as a consequence of the comments box becoming so important it seemed wiser to give everything its individual entry, so this one does stick out a bit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-551018</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-551018</guid>
		<description>Seems odd to list these two together. They aren't the only mismatched consecutive chart toppers (Good Vibrations and Green Green Grass of Home, anyone?)

Tears clearly struck a chord with a lot of people, as it is among the top 20 selling singles of all time in the UK. In comparison, major acts like ABBA, U2 and, yes, the Rolling Stones don't have any entries in the top 100.

....oh and both the next two singles to top the UK chart, the Carnival Is Over and We Can Work It Out/Day Tripper, are also among the UK's biggest sellers of all time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems odd to list these two together. They aren&#8217;t the only mismatched consecutive chart toppers (Good Vibrations and Green Green Grass of Home, anyone?)</p>
<p>Tears clearly struck a chord with a lot of people, as it is among the top 20 selling singles of all time in the UK. In comparison, major acts like ABBA, U2 and, yes, the Rolling Stones don&#8217;t have any entries in the top 100.</p>
<p>&#8230;.oh and both the next two singles to top the UK chart, the Carnival Is Over and We Can Work It Out/Day Tripper, are also among the UK&#8217;s biggest sellers of all time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-32408</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 14:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-32408</guid>
		<description>Good point!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-32407</link>
		<dc:creator>pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 14:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-32407</guid>
		<description>[should the songtitles both go into the header here? i thought some kind of BRUNDLEFLY mutation had occurred] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[should the songtitles both go into the header here? i thought some kind of BRUNDLEFLY mutation had occurred]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22616</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22616</guid>
		<description>Also, I'm afraid that Canada beat the UK to status as 51st State, long ago.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;American, eh ?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Brian C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I&#8217;m afraid that Canada beat the UK to status as 51st State, long ago.</p>
<p>American, eh ?</p>
<p>Brian C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Kogan</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22615</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Kogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22615</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;forever Britain as the 51st State&lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Does this mean reggaeton will supplant grime after all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>forever Britain as the 51st State</i></p>
<p>Does this mean reggaeton will supplant grime after all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22614</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 14:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22614</guid>
		<description>Sorry , Robin. What am I missing here .&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;British middle class kid ( with love of American Blues )  becomes rock n roll anti hero to millions and in the process makes a gazillion bucks. And because he's rich , and finds himself being ripped off left right and centre, gets serious about the business side of  his "art". &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;In doing so finds himself at helm of big corporation. For many this means he has " sold out". &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;At the same time, his country undergoes much needed yet painful,  political overhaul . The emergence of  the " new rich' puts him at the epi-centre of of reactionary  sentiment. Rock and roller as symbol of emergence of thenoveau  bourgeiosie ?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Is that it ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry , Robin. What am I missing here .</p>
<p>British middle class kid ( with love of American Blues )  becomes rock n roll anti hero to millions and in the process makes a gazillion bucks. And because he&#8217;s rich , and finds himself being ripped off left right and centre, gets serious about the business side of  his &#8220;art&#8221;. </p>
<p>In doing so finds himself at helm of big corporation. For many this means he has &#8221; sold out&#8221;. </p>
<p>At the same time, his country undergoes much needed yet painful,  political overhaul . The emergence of  the &#8221; new rich&#8217; puts him at the epi-centre of of reactionary  sentiment. Rock and roller as symbol of emergence of thenoveau  bourgeiosie ?</p>
<p>Is that it ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22613</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22613</guid>
		<description>"forever rock'n'roll" = "forever Britain as the 51st State".  That's why I'm only interested in Jagger as a symbol, a sign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;forever rock&#8217;n'roll&#8221; = &#8220;forever Britain as the 51st State&#8221;.  That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m only interested in Jagger as a symbol, a sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22612</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22612</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Frank here about all the political stuff.&lt;BR/&gt;I was there &#038; at this point we/he/they/them hadn't chosen any sides. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;It was first the music then the sex, later the drugs but forever rock n' roll.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Brian C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Frank here about all the political stuff.<br />I was there &#038; at this point we/he/they/them hadn&#8217;t chosen any sides. </p>
<p>It was first the music then the sex, later the drugs but forever rock n&#8217; roll.</p>
<p>Brian C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22611</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22611</guid>
		<description>I take the last paragraph of Frank's first posting as an endorsement of politics I despise.  Instantly I'm reminded of why I left ILM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take the last paragraph of Frank&#8217;s first posting as an endorsement of politics I despise.  Instantly I&#8217;m reminded of why I left ILM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Kogan</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22610</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Kogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22610</guid>
		<description>The Kinks deserve a mention here, as the one band that could have found the "Cloud" content in a "Tears" sound. (Not that I've actually heard "Tears.")</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kinks deserve a mention here, as the one band that could have found the &#8220;Cloud&#8221; content in a &#8220;Tears&#8221; sound. (Not that I&#8217;ve actually heard &#8220;Tears.&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Kogan</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22609</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Kogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22609</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;and jagger had become the enemy by retreating from the goals Tom outlines here, not by pursuing them&lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Mark, is &lt;I&gt;goals&lt;/I&gt; the word you want?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I'll bet many/most Britpunks wouldn't've been at home with the old Jagger either, since he wasn't giving them the nice Us vs. Them that they wanted.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;But the real prob so many dullhead punks had with the '70s Stones was that the Stones hung on to their dirty glamour, didn't forego the femme and the fame. The problem &lt;I&gt;I&lt;/I&gt; had with the '70s Stones was that they weren't the Dolls or Stooges, that the sound had lost its punch and its glitter. (But I did like &lt;I&gt;Emotional Rescue&lt;/I&gt;, when it came along, a funny little groove band hooking onto a new dance, again.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>and jagger had become the enemy by retreating from the goals Tom outlines here, not by pursuing them</i></p>
<p>Mark, is <i>goals</i> the word you want?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll bet many/most Britpunks wouldn&#8217;t've been at home with the old Jagger either, since he wasn&#8217;t giving them the nice Us vs. Them that they wanted.</p>
<p>But the real prob so many dullhead punks had with the &#8217;70s Stones was that the Stones hung on to their dirty glamour, didn&#8217;t forego the femme and the fame. The problem <i>I</i> had with the &#8217;70s Stones was that they weren&#8217;t the Dolls or Stooges, that the sound had lost its punch and its glitter. (But I did like <i>Emotional Rescue</i>, when it came along, a funny little groove band hooking onto a new dance, again.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Kogan</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22608</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Kogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22608</guid>
		<description>When I look at lyrics without listening, I can think of "Cloud" being "Gimme Shelter" to "Satisfaction"'s "Midnight Rambler": in "Satisfaction"/"Rambler" he's on the prowl but can't break through; in "Cloud"/"Shelter" he's cowering behind steel-plate doors. (Not that Stones '69 even holds a candle to Stones '65.) I can also see "Cloud" as a precursor to "Heroin" and "Sister Ray" and "Death Trip" and "Private World" and "Sonic Reducer" and "Pretty Vacant" and "No Feelings" (not to mention "I Am a Rock"), all of which are a thousand times more relevant than Thatcher. Also - still reading but not listening - I see "Cloud" as a tossed-off comic rejoinder to "Satisfaction"'s sociological pretensions. O! Poor me! I'm traumatized by parking tickets and detergent specials! Neither deep moat nor castle walls keep the adverts at bay! O woe! O me! - though there is the quick bit where he lets us glimpse the Jagger dagger, tells us it's his party and we'll cry if he wants us to. The tensions and sleight of hand here are already far more entangled than were the obvious ironies of "Heart of Stone."&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;But then, I &lt;I&gt;don't&lt;/I&gt; read it, I &lt;I&gt;hear&lt;/I&gt; it, which is another universe. Jagger's words are so smart because they tell you he &lt;I&gt;knows&lt;/I&gt; better - knows that his stances won't hold, that the carpet's moving, that &lt;I&gt;no&lt;/I&gt; stances hold, and he'll give it a jerk just to watch himself tumble. But the singing and playing are smarter still. They know better than the knowing better, know that you feel your stance, live your pose, even when your contradictory stances rip you to pieces. You stand with conviction while you're demolishing your own ground. So the world really &lt;I&gt;is&lt;/I&gt; crashing in, no joke, and the Stones throw bombs in response, and invite everyone to sing along.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Of course, 40 years later the song is a familiar standby, exceeded in bomb power by a million subsequent pre-fab explosions (though exceeded in intelligence by none), its ka-boom long since muffled.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;The political analysis on this thread makes no sense to me (too facile or truncated or cryptic), but perhaps it shows that some of you are still open to being hurt by this music. Good for the music, if it hurts you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I look at lyrics without listening, I can think of &#8220;Cloud&#8221; being &#8220;Gimme Shelter&#8221; to &#8220;Satisfaction&#8221;&#8217;s &#8220;Midnight Rambler&#8221;: in &#8220;Satisfaction&#8221;/&#8221;Rambler&#8221; he&#8217;s on the prowl but can&#8217;t break through; in &#8220;Cloud&#8221;/&#8221;Shelter&#8221; he&#8217;s cowering behind steel-plate doors. (Not that Stones &#8216;69 even holds a candle to Stones &#8216;65.) I can also see &#8220;Cloud&#8221; as a precursor to &#8220;Heroin&#8221; and &#8220;Sister Ray&#8221; and &#8220;Death Trip&#8221; and &#8220;Private World&#8221; and &#8220;Sonic Reducer&#8221; and &#8220;Pretty Vacant&#8221; and &#8220;No Feelings&#8221; (not to mention &#8220;I Am a Rock&#8221;), all of which are a thousand times more relevant than Thatcher. Also - still reading but not listening - I see &#8220;Cloud&#8221; as a tossed-off comic rejoinder to &#8220;Satisfaction&#8221;&#8217;s sociological pretensions. O! Poor me! I&#8217;m traumatized by parking tickets and detergent specials! Neither deep moat nor castle walls keep the adverts at bay! O woe! O me! - though there is the quick bit where he lets us glimpse the Jagger dagger, tells us it&#8217;s his party and we&#8217;ll cry if he wants us to. The tensions and sleight of hand here are already far more entangled than were the obvious ironies of &#8220;Heart of Stone.&#8221;</p>
<p>But then, I <i>don&#8217;t</i> read it, I <i>hear</i> it, which is another universe. Jagger&#8217;s words are so smart because they tell you he <i>knows</i> better - knows that his stances won&#8217;t hold, that the carpet&#8217;s moving, that <i>no</i> stances hold, and he&#8217;ll give it a jerk just to watch himself tumble. But the singing and playing are smarter still. They know better than the knowing better, know that you feel your stance, live your pose, even when your contradictory stances rip you to pieces. You stand with conviction while you&#8217;re demolishing your own ground. So the world really <i>is</i> crashing in, no joke, and the Stones throw bombs in response, and invite everyone to sing along.</p>
<p>Of course, 40 years later the song is a familiar standby, exceeded in bomb power by a million subsequent pre-fab explosions (though exceeded in intelligence by none), its ka-boom long since muffled.</p>
<p>The political analysis on this thread makes no sense to me (too facile or truncated or cryptic), but perhaps it shows that some of you are still open to being hurt by this music. Good for the music, if it hurts you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22607</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22607</guid>
		<description>I think Lena is onto something re. Jagger and the LSE.  Not all well-off rock stars become Tories - Paul McCartney has never leaned that way unless I am very much mistaken - but the ones who do are disproprionately important because the essence of Thatcherism was the reheating of Toryism to make it palatable to those who had earlier been turned off by the association between Toryism and cultural fogeyism, and without the influence of Jagger et al Thatcherism might never have happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Lena is onto something re. Jagger and the LSE.  Not all well-off rock stars become Tories - Paul McCartney has never leaned that way unless I am very much mistaken - but the ones who do are disproprionately important because the essence of Thatcherism was the reheating of Toryism to make it palatable to those who had earlier been turned off by the association between Toryism and cultural fogeyism, and without the influence of Jagger et al Thatcherism might never have happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lena</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22606</link>
		<dc:creator>Lena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22606</guid>
		<description>It was common knowledge in my household that this was a better song than "Satisfaction" - at least that's what my mom always insisted.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I was going to say that maybe Jagger's time in economics school (as opposed to art) had something to do with Thatcherism, but then do all well-off rock stars become Tories in the end anyway, no matter where they started?  Sigh.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Oh, and thanks to Marcello for giving some idea of what the Dodd parallel would be, as I had no idea...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was common knowledge in my household that this was a better song than &#8220;Satisfaction&#8221; - at least that&#8217;s what my mom always insisted.</p>
<p>I was going to say that maybe Jagger&#8217;s time in economics school (as opposed to art) had something to do with Thatcherism, but then do all well-off rock stars become Tories in the end anyway, no matter where they started?  Sigh.</p>
<p>Oh, and thanks to Marcello for giving some idea of what the Dodd parallel would be, as I had no idea&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22605</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22605</guid>
		<description>The actual buying of the music was, for me, as much of an experience , almost, as listening  to it.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;When I couldn't get a single form the newsagent and " smoke" shop next door to our flat, it'd require a trip to downtown Toronto.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;And for as long as I remember , and still, there was Sam the Record Man. It was and still is a multi - floored music emporium. I've been buying there for at least 35 years ! It's a shrine in Toronto and I still spend hours there when I go to " town ".&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Sam Sniderman and his brother ran &#038; owned it and were always great supporters of Canadian music. (So I guess we have them partially to blame for Bryan Adams &#038;  Sarah McLaughlin )&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Sam very nearly went out of business with the technological changes in distribution system but he ( his sons ) are hanging in there.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;He's at http://www.samscd.com/&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The actual buying of the music was, for me, as much of an experience , almost, as listening  to it.</p>
<p>When I couldn&#8217;t get a single form the newsagent and &#8221; smoke&#8221; shop next door to our flat, it&#8217;d require a trip to downtown Toronto.</p>
<p>And for as long as I remember , and still, there was Sam the Record Man. It was and still is a multi - floored music emporium. I&#8217;ve been buying there for at least 35 years ! It&#8217;s a shrine in Toronto and I still spend hours there when I go to &#8221; town &#8220;.</p>
<p>Sam Sniderman and his brother ran &#038; owned it and were always great supporters of Canadian music. (So I guess we have them partially to blame for Bryan Adams &#038;  Sarah McLaughlin )</p>
<p>Sam very nearly went out of business with the technological changes in distribution system but he ( his sons ) are hanging in there.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s at <a href="http://www.samscd.com/" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.samscd.com/?referer=');">http://www.samscd.com/</a></p>
<p>Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LondonLee</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22604</link>
		<dc:creator>LondonLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22604</guid>
		<description>There was a "hippy" shop in Soho called Dark They Were And Golden Eyed where I used to buy my Marvel Comics, I think they sold records too.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Were Harlequin Records around in the 60s? I used to buy a lot of records there in the 70s (as well as Woolworth's and a guy in North End Road Market who sold singles). I think Our Price bought them out.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;What's the difference between Mick Jagger and a Scottish farmer?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;MIck Jagger says "Hey you, get off of my cloud" and a  Scottish farmer says "Hey McCloud, get off of my ewe"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a &#8220;hippy&#8221; shop in Soho called Dark They Were And Golden Eyed where I used to buy my Marvel Comics, I think they sold records too.</p>
<p>Were Harlequin Records around in the 60s? I used to buy a lot of records there in the 70s (as well as Woolworth&#8217;s and a guy in North End Road Market who sold singles). I think Our Price bought them out.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the difference between Mick Jagger and a Scottish farmer?</p>
<p>MIck Jagger says &#8220;Hey you, get off of my cloud&#8221; and a  Scottish farmer says &#8220;Hey McCloud, get off of my ewe&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcello</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22603</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22603</guid>
		<description>Politically it is worth noting that Ken Dodd appeared at Labour election rallies in the '60s and '70s, and at Tory election rallies from '79 onwards, so the parallels run deep (cf. "Let's Work" and mouldering fivers behind the toilet).&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;In American terms, the success of "Tears" would have been equivalent to, say, Sid Caesar or Milton Berle having the biggest single of '65 with a cover of "Mammy" or similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politically it is worth noting that Ken Dodd appeared at Labour election rallies in the &#8217;60s and &#8217;70s, and at Tory election rallies from &#8216;79 onwards, so the parallels run deep (cf. &#8220;Let&#8217;s Work&#8221; and mouldering fivers behind the toilet).</p>
<p>In American terms, the success of &#8220;Tears&#8221; would have been equivalent to, say, Sid Caesar or Milton Berle having the biggest single of &#8216;65 with a cover of &#8220;Mammy&#8221; or similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Connor</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22602</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2005 00:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22602</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;&gt;  p^nk s said...&lt;BR/&gt;&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&gt;    plug plus!! &lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I didn't recognise you with your capitals on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>>  p^nk s said&#8230;<br />><br />>    plug plus!! </i></p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t recognise you with your capitals on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosalind Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22601</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosalind Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22601</guid>
		<description>Possibly by 1969, certainly by 1970, I and most of my peers had given up on the singles charts and most of the output of Radio One.  It was the age of the LP, and although LPs had been around for a while 1969-70 was probably the point at which album sales began to outstrip singles sales.  &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;So, Rumbelows in Welwyn Garden City didn't have the space to stock significant numbers of LPs with room for browsing (there's another difference - you asked for your single from a rack behind the counter, but albums were there to be browsed).  They went under, to be replaced by Harlequin Records, which was more specialised but considered less cool than Rag Records in Hatfield.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Welwyn Stores, on the other hand, welcomed the album market - they were already equipped for the comparatively few albums that were about, and you could always browse there, I think.  Also, if you hung around the Stores' record department for long enough on a Saturday, all your friends would pass through sooner or later, so it was a hang-out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly by 1969, certainly by 1970, I and most of my peers had given up on the singles charts and most of the output of Radio One.  It was the age of the LP, and although LPs had been around for a while 1969-70 was probably the point at which album sales began to outstrip singles sales.  </p>
<p>So, Rumbelows in Welwyn Garden City didn&#8217;t have the space to stock significant numbers of LPs with room for browsing (there&#8217;s another difference - you asked for your single from a rack behind the counter, but albums were there to be browsed).  They went under, to be replaced by Harlequin Records, which was more specialised but considered less cool than Rag Records in Hatfield.</p>
<p>Welwyn Stores, on the other hand, welcomed the album market - they were already equipped for the comparatively few albums that were about, and you could always browse there, I think.  Also, if you hung around the Stores&#8217; record department for long enough on a Saturday, all your friends would pass through sooner or later, so it was a hang-out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Gamon</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22600</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Gamon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22600</guid>
		<description>Ditto to Rosalind. In Bishops Stortford you had a choice between Rumbelows and a large family-run store whose name escapes me but specialised in hideous china ornaments. The records were always a sideline but they had two of those wonderful enclosed booths, big enough to hold three people, where you could audition your prospective six shillings and eightpence purchase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto to Rosalind. In Bishops Stortford you had a choice between Rumbelows and a large family-run store whose name escapes me but specialised in hideous china ornaments. The records were always a sideline but they had two of those wonderful enclosed booths, big enough to hold three people, where you could audition your prospective six shillings and eightpence purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22599</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22599</guid>
		<description>oh, my calling Jagger the "inventor of the New Right in Britain" is debate-inciting provocation; I don't think he invented it, but I think he brought a lot of things into the open and legitimised the Right for disenfranchised, disillusioned erstwhile Wilson-supporting (but not Labour-supporting, as such) young people, who had previously been put off by the cultural fogeyism they associated with Right-wing politics.  the great unanswered question is whether those people would have gone that way if Wilson hadn't passed the Marine Offences Act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, my calling Jagger the &#8220;inventor of the New Right in Britain&#8221; is debate-inciting provocation; I don&#8217;t think he invented it, but I think he brought a lot of things into the open and legitimised the Right for disenfranchised, disillusioned erstwhile Wilson-supporting (but not Labour-supporting, as such) young people, who had previously been put off by the cultural fogeyism they associated with Right-wing politics.  the great unanswered question is whether those people would have gone that way if Wilson hadn&#8217;t passed the Marine Offences Act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p^nk s</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22598</link>
		<dc:creator>p^nk s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22598</guid>
		<description>:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22597</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22597</guid>
		<description>Omigod!  I own it!&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Doctor Mod</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omigod!  I own it!</p>
<p>Doctor Mod</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p^nk s</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22596</link>
		<dc:creator>p^nk s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/04/ken-dodd-tears/#comment-22596</guid>
		<description>&lt;a HREF="http://www.bfi.org.uk/bookvid/books/catalogue/details.php?bookid=499" REL="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;plug plus&lt;/A&gt;!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a HREF="http://www.bfi.org.uk/bookvid/books/catalogue/details.php?bookid=499" REL="nofollow" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.bfi.org.uk/bookvid/books/catalogue/details.php?bookid=499&amp;referer=');">plug plus</a>!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
