THE BEATLES – “I Want To Hold Your Hand”
One reason I’m happy I started Popular is the entry it’s given me into enjoying the early Beatles. I can’t ever remember Beatles records playing in the house but I can’t ever remember not knowing these songs, either – certainly the first time I purposely listened to “I Want To Hold Your Hand” I knew it. They’re the currency of pop, but actually liking them seemed as odd as, well, fancying the picture of the Queen on an old coin.
Listening to them in context I can’t help but get a sniff of that old coronation fuss, even if I still find them hard to adore. It’s not so much the genre-shift between The Beatles and the stuff that came before (which had positive qualities of its own), more the difference between them and the songs surrounding them. Imagine the Searchers or Gerry Marsden doing “I Want To Hold Your Hand”. You’d have got the upbeat feel, you’d have got most of the energy, you might at a pinch have got the lovely double-handclaps – but there’s no doubt the performance would have been blunter and duller.
For one thing the Beatles were skilled at covering Merseybeat’s particular Achilles heel. There’s a streak of childish whimsy in a lot of the beat group hits that has aged dreadfully. “I Like It”, “Sweets For My Sweet”, the ghastly “Little Children”, all suffer from a cloying attempt at wide-eyed innocence that ends up simply trite. “I Want To Hold Your Hand” has a title that rings exactly these warning bells. But the band obviously know it and they crack open the song every time the chorus comes round, launching themselves into those high “HAND!!!”s, demented with glee. It gives the song its repeated climax, its hands-in-the-air power and handsomely overturns any lingering tweeness.
7
The thing that strikes me most about this forgotten gem from the distant past is how hard it is to sing; unless you have a second person to do the harmonies, it sounds ridiculous, particularly when you get to the low-down “I think you’ll understand” bit. And the section in the chorus where they stretch out the word “hand” until it is seven syllables long. The other thing that gets me is how frantic the song is. And the “I get high / I can’t hide” confusion is uncanny.
Forgotten??!!
Flippin’ kids!
Indeed, I think that one could make a case that this is the most well-known song of the twentieth century, or at least since 1950. Actually, that’s not right; it might be more accurate to say that it’s the most well-known song TITLE. What I mean by that is that probably relatively few people could actually sing the lyrics accurately from beginning to end, but if even the most out-of-it person knows one thing about the Beatles, it’s that they recorded this song. That’s from a U.S. perspective, where the song has immense historical importance. Are things different in the U.K.?
Slightly different, James, in that IWTHYH was the song that really kicked off the British invasion in the States, Ed Sullivan and all that; but if any one song has equivalent significance in the UK it’s “She Loves You” – the one that returned to the top after seven weeks away on the back of the Royal Variety Show and the onset of Beatlemania, and was in the top three from September to December. It was removed from number one by IWTHYH, and they had a 1-2 at Christmas.
When the Sun reported on the vigil in Central Park following Lennon’s death the headline was “They Loved Him, Yeah Yeah Yeah”…
I wonder what it was about this song that caused it to be the U.S. breakthrough. In my mind the British were right – “She Loves You” is a much better song. (“She Loves You” was a U.S. smash eventually, of course, but out of order.) “I Saw Her Standing There” (only an album track in the U.K. but the B-side of “I Want to Hold Your Hand” in the U.S.) was the best early Beatles song of all, in my opinion.
“Forgotten??!!”
For future reference, it was a joke; I was stunned that an article about this song could go for five years without attracting a single comment, on a site that’s full of comments. Part of me wonders if the site had recently wiped out its old comments, or if comments had not been enabled until October 2008.
I’ll be back and commenting more when this blog catches up with my teenage years – the golden days of acid house, SAW, and serious-faced post-Live Aid musicians with something important to say, e.g. Tanita Tikaram, Terence Trent D’Arby, Red Box, Jive Bunny, er, The Firm, etc.
On a more serious level, I believe that the Beatles are starting their long slide into history. Soon they will all be dead, and then there will be two further rounds of re-releases, and after that they will no longer sell records and will just fade away. The people who were teenagers in the 1960s will be dead or senile in twenty years and their music already sounds a little alien and weird. Soon it will be a period piece, and then it will be only of interest to historians; the history books of a century hence will reduce the band to a paragraph in the section of the “culture” chapter that deals with pop music.
Ahem!
This alien and weird teenager of the 1960s has no intention of being old and senile.
Flippin’ kids!
“Part of me wonders if the site had recently wiped out its old comments”. Almost right. Comments when this post was current were indeed lost.
yay to iPod copy/paste :)
I believe I read somewhere that ‘She Loves You’ had been played on American Bandstand the previous year, and the panel had laughed at it and given it a total thumbs down. I can’t even imagine that. To me it has far more pop wallop than this (which is saying a lot). I think SLY might have been a little too ‘aggressive’ and ‘Mersey’ to really reach out. IWTHYH has a sentiment that parents could find palatable; “I really like you, can I hold your hand please?” Also; timing. This one came out after the shock of Kennedy when the US was looking for something, anything, to make them feel better.
@#7 – Your comments have an irresistible parallel with those of the sniffy ‘serious’ music critics who, in 1963/64, confidently predicted that the Beatles would be forgotten within a year. 40 years after they broke up, their recordings remain as popular as ever with successive generations – i.e. not just among the ageing baby boomers whom you seem to believe still dominate popular taste – and continue to exert a huge influence on much contemporary music. As such, your prophecy that the Fabs will soon be a mere “period piece” seems pretty far-fetched.
Indeed, if your logic were correct, the music of Frank Sinatra would already be slipping into obscurity, and nobody would even know anything by Beethoven (died 1827) or Bach (1750)…
@11 Frank who?
DESERT ISLAND DISCS WATCH:
Mary Archer, Wife of Jeffrey Archer, Scientist(1988)
Kaffe Fasset, Decorative Artist(1990)
George Martin, Record Producer(1995)
Andrew Lloyd Webber, Composer(1999)
Jerry Springer, Broadcaster (2009).