<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FLOYD CRAMER - &#8220;On The Rebound&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2004/07/floyd-cramer-on-the-rebound/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2004/07/floyd-cramer-on-the-rebound/</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: rosie</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2004/07/floyd-cramer-on-the-rebound/#comment-438558</link>
		<dc:creator>rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2004/07/floyd-cramer-on-the-rebound/#comment-438558</guid>
		<description>Who used this a signature tune?  Some Populist will know, I'm sure of that.  A little voice in the back of my head keeps whispering 'Jimmy Savile' - &lt;em&gt;Savile's Travels&lt;/em&gt;, maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who used this a signature tune?  Some Populist will know, I&#8217;m sure of that.  A little voice in the back of my head keeps whispering &#8216;Jimmy Savile&#8217; - <em>Savile&#8217;s Travels</em>, maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB Pink</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2004/07/floyd-cramer-on-the-rebound/#comment-260014</link>
		<dc:creator>JB Pink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2004/07/floyd-cramer-on-the-rebound/#comment-260014</guid>
		<description>On The Rebound.  This piece of music, like all music, has to be viewed in both the context of the period &#38; location it was released and then later in its historical context.  

I was born in my dad's hometown 35 miles from the Grand Ole Opry.  That plus my mother being British allowed me to experience and appreciate a wide range of music.  I've always enjoyed  rock/pop instrumentals and "On The Rebound" fits right in with what was being released in the late 50’s &#38; early 60’s.    In that context OTR is a pleasant piece of music and warranted its one week at #1.  

However, today, 45 years later, it wouldn't even place in the top 200 of either pop, rock, contemporary, easy listening, or country.

Each generation seeks its own identity and music is often the #1 thing that they change.  For example, back in his hey-day, Chuck Berry was asked what his favorite music was, the stuff he listens to when he has the time.  He quickly replied "Big Band Music".  The reporter was shocked.  He asked, "How could you, the real king of rock and roll love and listen to ancient music like that?"  Chuck answer would have the approval of every shrink or counselor in the USA.  He said that each of us love the music we grew up with.  We're a blank slate when we are young and whatever we listen to will always be it: the best music there is.  Just like there is no love like your first love, there is no music like your first music.  Kids of today (1958) will love rock and roll to the extent that I love big band music."  (Note: this is not a word for word quote, but real close).

So, take it as it is – a pleasant and enjoyable piece of the early 1960s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On The Rebound.  This piece of music, like all music, has to be viewed in both the context of the period &amp; location it was released and then later in its historical context.  </p>
<p>I was born in my dad&#8217;s hometown 35 miles from the Grand Ole Opry.  That plus my mother being British allowed me to experience and appreciate a wide range of music.  I&#8217;ve always enjoyed  rock/pop instrumentals and &#8220;On The Rebound&#8221; fits right in with what was being released in the late 50’s &amp; early 60’s.    In that context OTR is a pleasant piece of music and warranted its one week at #1.  </p>
<p>However, today, 45 years later, it wouldn&#8217;t even place in the top 200 of either pop, rock, contemporary, easy listening, or country.</p>
<p>Each generation seeks its own identity and music is often the #1 thing that they change.  For example, back in his hey-day, Chuck Berry was asked what his favorite music was, the stuff he listens to when he has the time.  He quickly replied &#8220;Big Band Music&#8221;.  The reporter was shocked.  He asked, &#8220;How could you, the real king of rock and roll love and listen to ancient music like that?&#8221;  Chuck answer would have the approval of every shrink or counselor in the USA.  He said that each of us love the music we grew up with.  We&#8217;re a blank slate when we are young and whatever we listen to will always be it: the best music there is.  Just like there is no love like your first love, there is no music like your first music.  Kids of today (1958) will love rock and roll to the extent that I love big band music.&#8221;  (Note: this is not a word for word quote, but real close).</p>
<p>So, take it as it is – a pleasant and enjoyable piece of the early 1960s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2004/07/floyd-cramer-on-the-rebound/#comment-18290</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2004/07/floyd-cramer-on-the-rebound/#comment-18290</guid>
		<description>5????? I must have been ker-az-ay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5????? I must have been ker-az-ay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
