music TV & Film games books food pubs science sport
Search Random post Register Login E-mail FT rss

Popular

September 17th, 2003

KAY STARR – ‘Comes A-Long A-Love’

(#3, 23rd January 1953)

A gutsy, danceable swing tune - just a hint of throat in Kay Starr’s voice to make it sexy, even though here she’s playing older sister, thumping you between the shoulders, telling you to pick yourself up. I’ve got a cold today and I appreciate it - thanks Kay! I wonder if this style seemed dated in 1953 - to my ignorant ears it sounds a very typical swing tune and (with the benefit of foresight) there’s not much coming up that sounds like it. But to my knowing 2003 ears it sounds a lot more modern than the songs that surround it. 7

Written by Tom on Wednesday, September 17th, 2003 | 1,738 views |

Responses

  1. FT's Doctor Mod on October 29th, 2006

    While I’ve only heard this particular song a few times, Kay Starr’s “Side by Side” was one of the first songs I could sing along with as a child. Her voice had a certain sharpness about it that made it sound a bit perky and even cheeky, but altogether fun. Many of her recordings (like those of Patti Page or Mary Ford) took advantage of studio technology with double tracked vocals, so that she was singing harmony with her own lead–nothing special about it now, but it was quite novel in the early 50s.

    The sense of fun here sets it apart from other early 50s number ones, many of which are just too lugubrious for their own good. I quite agree about this sounding more “modern” that most other titles from this period. What I hear in “Comes A-Long A-Love,” though, could have found a place a decade later. Perhaps it’s the sharp-edged vocal, but after listening to this, I could almost imagine a young Cilla Black singing it. It might have suited her.

  2. FT's Doctor Mod on October 30th, 2006

    All things being relative, it was a 7 for its time. Most of the other early 50s #1’s are truly something less.

  3. FT's Tom on October 30th, 2006

    The marks aren’t “for the time”, though, they’re “at the time of listening” - so 7 may be generous, 6 would be closer, but then I’ve not listened to it for a while. I might give it a play at the club next week actually.

  4. Marcello Carlin on October 18th, 2007

    Is Kay Starr the only Red Indian artist to reach number one?

  5. intothefireuk on November 3rd, 2007

    The name seems to ring distant bells but I don’t recall actually hearing this tune before I started reading ‘popular’. It’s big, bright & breezy but not very substantial (a blueprint for modern pop ?) aimed squarely, I would imagine, at the dancefloor.

  6. wichita lineman on May 26th, 2008

    Kay’s playing older sister alright - someone else’s older sister who you might be a little intimidated by; she sounds like a good dancer. Most of this single’s modernity is in the syncopation. Pretty much everything in the charts around it sounds like something out of music hall or Zeppo’s bit that spoilt the Marx Brothers films. The brass, bass, and the neatly rhythmic title make this pretty irresistible, and a solid 7. Anyone know if it’s a cover of something on the ‘race’ chart?

  7. FT's rosie on May 26th, 2008

    Marcello @ 4: Depends what you mean by Red Indian. Kay Starr is - she’s still alive, of course, like Al Martino, Jo Stafford and Eddie Fisher, which might put these early charts into some kind of perspective - three-quarters Iroquois and one quarter European, so she’s not the only full-blooded Native American to top the British charts. I haven’t made a study of which performers had Indian blood but certainly Marvin Rainwater did, and so of course did Jimi Hendrix. There’s almost certainly others.

 

Add a comment

(Register to guarantee your comments don't get marked as spam)