<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GEORGE MICHAEL &#8211; &#8220;Careless Whisper&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:44:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooksie</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-679362</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooksie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-679362</guid>
		<description>Instant classic. Never really understood how something that&#039;s forgivable for one artist is a stick to beat another. &quot;Guilty feet&quot; is a clunky line, but the song also features a lot of great lines and a cracking sax hook.

&lt;I&gt;&quot;Tonight the music seems so loud / I wish that we could lose this crowd&quot;
&quot;Maybe it&#039;s better this way / We&#039;d hurt each other with the things we want to say&quot;&lt;/I&gt;

Those lines alone are stronger than 75% of all ballad lyrics. They also have a ring of truth to anyone that&#039;s been there. Even if it is well-executed calculation - it works.

10 for me: George, you&#039;re going to be a big star. Even if everyone knocks you, they&#039;re just proving they can&#039;t hear very well. You&#039;re in another league. Kiss Frankie and Duran goodbye. Say hello to MJ and Madonna.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instant classic. Never really understood how something that&#8217;s forgivable for one artist is a stick to beat another. &#8220;Guilty feet&#8221; is a clunky line, but the song also features a lot of great lines and a cracking sax hook.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Tonight the music seems so loud / I wish that we could lose this crowd&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Maybe it&#8217;s better this way / We&#8217;d hurt each other with the things we want to say&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Those lines alone are stronger than 75% of all ballad lyrics. They also have a ring of truth to anyone that&#8217;s been there. Even if it is well-executed calculation &#8211; it works.</p>
<p>10 for me: George, you&#8217;re going to be a big star. Even if everyone knocks you, they&#8217;re just proving they can&#8217;t hear very well. You&#8217;re in another league. Kiss Frankie and Duran goodbye. Say hello to MJ and Madonna.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Smart</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-646684</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Smart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-646684</guid>
		<description>Light Entertainment Watch: George isn&#039;t on television all that often;

ASPEL &amp; COMPANY: with Peter Cook, George Michael, Jacqueline Bisset (1986)

PARKINSON: Parkinson Meets George Michael (1998)

PARKINSON: with George Michael, Alan Alda, Jamie Foxx (2006)

PARKINSON: with Scissor Sisters, Stephen Fry, George Michael, Joan Rivers (2007)

POP QUIZ: with Simon Kirke, Hazel O&#039;Connor, George Michael, Jools Holland, Bill Bruford, Buster Bloodvessel (1983)

POP QUIZ: with Jon Moss, Tracie, Steve Harley, George Michael, Curt Smith, Chris Rea (1984)

THE SOUTH BANK SHOW: George Michael (1990)

THE SOUTH BANK SHOW: George Michael: I&#039;m Your Man (2006)

STAR STORIES: George Michael: Watch Without Prejudice Vol 1 (2006)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Light Entertainment Watch: George isn&#8217;t on television all that often;</p>
<p>ASPEL &amp; COMPANY: with Peter Cook, George Michael, Jacqueline Bisset (1986)</p>
<p>PARKINSON: Parkinson Meets George Michael (1998)</p>
<p>PARKINSON: with George Michael, Alan Alda, Jamie Foxx (2006)</p>
<p>PARKINSON: with Scissor Sisters, Stephen Fry, George Michael, Joan Rivers (2007)</p>
<p>POP QUIZ: with Simon Kirke, Hazel O&#8217;Connor, George Michael, Jools Holland, Bill Bruford, Buster Bloodvessel (1983)</p>
<p>POP QUIZ: with Jon Moss, Tracie, Steve Harley, George Michael, Curt Smith, Chris Rea (1984)</p>
<p>THE SOUTH BANK SHOW: George Michael (1990)</p>
<p>THE SOUTH BANK SHOW: George Michael: I&#8217;m Your Man (2006)</p>
<p>STAR STORIES: George Michael: Watch Without Prejudice Vol 1 (2006)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DV</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-645327</link>
		<dc:creator>DV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-645327</guid>
		<description>I always think of members of the Guild of British Saxophonists citing this as an example of how great things were in the 80s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always think of members of the Guild of British Saxophonists citing this as an example of how great things were in the 80s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew H</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644905</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644905</guid>
		<description>Erm, SmashHitsWatch: George didn&#039;t really draw the solo distinction, referring to &#039;Wake Me Up...&#039; and this bookending &#039;Two Tribes&#039; as &quot;a Frankie sandwich! Or maybe a Wham!burger!&quot;

I&#039;m not particularly warm to &#039;Careless Whisper&#039;. Bought it like a Pavlov dog but it became one for the mums really, didn&#039;t it? I found that alienating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm, SmashHitsWatch: George didn&#8217;t really draw the solo distinction, referring to &#8216;Wake Me Up&#8230;&#8217; and this bookending &#8216;Two Tribes&#8217; as &#8220;a Frankie sandwich! Or maybe a Wham!burger!&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not particularly warm to &#8216;Careless Whisper&#8217;. Bought it like a Pavlov dog but it became one for the mums really, didn&#8217;t it? I found that alienating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Smart</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644897</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Smart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644897</guid>
		<description>TOTPWatch: George Michael performed &#039;Careless Whisper&#039; on the Top Of The Pops transmitted on the 23rd of August 1984. Also in the studio that week were; Alphaville, Break Machine, Miami Sound Machine and Spandau Ballet. Mike Read &amp; Tommy Vance were the hosts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TOTPWatch: George Michael performed &#8216;Careless Whisper&#8217; on the Top Of The Pops transmitted on the 23rd of August 1984. Also in the studio that week were; Alphaville, Break Machine, Miami Sound Machine and Spandau Ballet. Mike Read &amp; Tommy Vance were the hosts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Smart</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644692</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Smart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644692</guid>
		<description>Hm, interesting to hear Dale Winton playing this in its 1984 context yesterday, and it made me enjoy it rather more than I was expecting. In the context of perhaps the most bombastic sounding chart music ever (for good in the case of Frankie, Laura Branigan and Iron Maiden) this thing sounded positively sedate, and exudes exactly the right sort of moodiness. And the flamenco guitar is lovely.

 I found it really plodding and boring at the time, though.

 No-one has yet commented on the obvious but rather wonderful binary complimenting of this and Last Christmas; Summer/ I done you wrong - Winter/ You done me wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, interesting to hear Dale Winton playing this in its 1984 context yesterday, and it made me enjoy it rather more than I was expecting. In the context of perhaps the most bombastic sounding chart music ever (for good in the case of Frankie, Laura Branigan and Iron Maiden) this thing sounded positively sedate, and exudes exactly the right sort of moodiness. And the flamenco guitar is lovely.</p>
<p> I found it really plodding and boring at the time, though.</p>
<p> No-one has yet commented on the obvious but rather wonderful binary complimenting of this and Last Christmas; Summer/ I done you wrong &#8211; Winter/ You done me wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644354</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644354</guid>
		<description>Sorry Tom. But having read so many of your critiques on most of the records on here, I think i have you sussed....Great minds think alike! The surname won&#039;t help - Smith!...not kidding.

You may be intrigued by the fact that I&#039;m 20 years older than you, but also consider myself a bit of an authority of No. 1 hit singles. Up to 1984, that is. i found that from &#039;85 onwards, I rapidly aged out of the pop music world, so from hereon in I will have few opinions about the second half of your brilliant and entertaining website.....I&#039;ll still read it though.

P.S. I live too far from London for your upcoming Party, but if ever you&#039;re in Manchester......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Tom. But having read so many of your critiques on most of the records on here, I think i have you sussed&#8230;.Great minds think alike! The surname won&#8217;t help &#8211; Smith!&#8230;not kidding.</p>
<p>You may be intrigued by the fact that I&#8217;m 20 years older than you, but also consider myself a bit of an authority of No. 1 hit singles. Up to 1984, that is. i found that from &#8217;85 onwards, I rapidly aged out of the pop music world, so from hereon in I will have few opinions about the second half of your brilliant and entertaining website&#8230;..I&#8217;ll still read it though.</p>
<p>P.S. I live too far from London for your upcoming Party, but if ever you&#8217;re in Manchester&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644315</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644315</guid>
		<description>Sukrat: yes, according to this: http://homepage2.nifty.com/truefaith/tosq/petersaville/1982-1984.html (from here: http://www.tosq.com/petersaville/ ) I tend to agree, but I think some of the stuff still looks totally luscious.  

The ! of Wham! on WMUBYGG reminds me of the colour coding on &quot;Power Corruption and Lies&quot;. Just saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sukrat: yes, according to this: <a href="http://homepage2.nifty.com/truefaith/tosq/petersaville/1982-1984.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/homepage2.nifty.com/truefaith/tosq/petersaville/1982-1984.html?referer=');">http://homepage2.nifty.com/truefaith/tosq/petersaville/1982-1984.html</a> (from here: <a href="http://www.tosq.com/petersaville/" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.tosq.com/petersaville/?referer=');">http://www.tosq.com/petersaville/</a> ) I tend to agree, but I think some of the stuff still looks totally luscious.  </p>
<p>The ! of Wham! on WMUBYGG reminds me of the colour coding on &#8220;Power Corruption and Lies&#8221;. Just saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeMCSG</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644280</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeMCSG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644280</guid>
		<description>#10 Agreed.Shamefaced is the better word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#10 Agreed.Shamefaced is the better word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a tanned rested and unlogged lørd sükråt wötsît</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644278</link>
		<dc:creator>a tanned rested and unlogged lørd sükråt wötsît</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644278</guid>
		<description>PS did the WMUBYGG sleeve posted on popular -- the one with the girlie who isn&#039;t pepsi or shirley? 

Can I just say how incredibly boring and trite P.Saville&#039;s work looks these days -- far more date-tied and trashily transient than everyone who wasn&#039;t trying so VERY VERY HARD to zelig their way into Art History</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS did the WMUBYGG sleeve posted on popular &#8212; the one with the girlie who isn&#8217;t pepsi or shirley? </p>
<p>Can I just say how incredibly boring and trite P.Saville&#8217;s work looks these days &#8212; far more date-tied and trashily transient than everyone who wasn&#8217;t trying so VERY VERY HARD to zelig their way into Art History</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644273</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644273</guid>
		<description>WMUBYGG&#039;s sleeve is so much better than this, which looks like they got the intern to &quot;do a Peter Saville&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WMUBYGG&#8217;s sleeve is so much better than this, which looks like they got the intern to &#8220;do a Peter Saville&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644269</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644269</guid>
		<description>I was going to say: first Peter Saville sleeve on Popular? But then I looked it up, and it seems he did &quot;Wake Me Up Before You Go Go&quot; too. I was surprised. 

So: first really obviously Peter Saville sleeve on Popular?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to say: first Peter Saville sleeve on Popular? But then I looked it up, and it seems he did &#8220;Wake Me Up Before You Go Go&#8221; too. I was surprised. </p>
<p>So: first really obviously Peter Saville sleeve on Popular?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644259</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644259</guid>
		<description>If anyone wants to start a guess-Tom&#039;s-marks betting shop backchannel though, I&#039;d be all for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone wants to start a guess-Tom&#8217;s-marks betting shop backchannel though, I&#8217;d be all for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644258</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644258</guid>
		<description>Haha I hadn&#039;t read this thread for a while - dead-on from Steve! (a surname identifier might be nice, I assume you aren&#039;t a Steve I already know...?)

Always happy to have my unconscious and conscious biases exposed! Popular is a wholly subjective exercise and I&#039;m the product of my time, place, gender, race, background etc.

(The embargo on discussing future #1s is partly to stop said discussion triggering my contrarian buttons)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha I hadn&#8217;t read this thread for a while &#8211; dead-on from Steve! (a surname identifier might be nice, I assume you aren&#8217;t a Steve I already know&#8230;?)</p>
<p>Always happy to have my unconscious and conscious biases exposed! Popular is a wholly subjective exercise and I&#8217;m the product of my time, place, gender, race, background etc.</p>
<p>(The embargo on discussing future #1s is partly to stop said discussion triggering my contrarian buttons)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a tanned rested and unlogged lørd sükråt wötsît</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644254</link>
		<dc:creator>a tanned rested and unlogged lørd sükråt wötsît</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644254</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the kind of thing that&#039;s a bit off the map of grownup jazz history, even though it overlaps with it: the kind of jazzers who pay attention to history tend to look down on it; the kind of fans who like it tend not to be good with history. You can probably go back to someone like Ben Webster or Coleman Hawkins for the germ of it: but neither did it as a colouring-smidgen for someone else&#039;s singing, and had a lot of other expressive modes (= they were jazzers). 50s R&amp;B favoured honkers: much less languid or citified. There&#039;s a biiiig jump between swing and swinging couples: the sax behind Sinatra isn&#039;t louche in this one-night-stand kinda way. Bah -- something else I forgot to quiz R.D.Cook about before he died :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the kind of thing that&#8217;s a bit off the map of grownup jazz history, even though it overlaps with it: the kind of jazzers who pay attention to history tend to look down on it; the kind of fans who like it tend not to be good with history. You can probably go back to someone like Ben Webster or Coleman Hawkins for the germ of it: but neither did it as a colouring-smidgen for someone else&#8217;s singing, and had a lot of other expressive modes (= they were jazzers). 50s R&amp;B favoured honkers: much less languid or citified. There&#8217;s a biiiig jump between swing and swinging couples: the sax behind Sinatra isn&#8217;t louche in this one-night-stand kinda way. Bah &#8212; something else I forgot to quiz R.D.Cook about before he died :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wichita lineman</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644253</link>
		<dc:creator>wichita lineman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644253</guid>
		<description>My shout (though a bit proto) would be Classics IV&#039;s original version of Spooky from early &#039;68. Almost identical arrangement to Dusty Springfield&#039;s now more celebrated version. More suggestive than sleazy, though. 

It felt like there was a real glut of sex-sax 45s in &#039;78, with B Joel&#039;s Just The Way You Are top of the heap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My shout (though a bit proto) would be Classics IV&#8217;s original version of Spooky from early &#8217;68. Almost identical arrangement to Dusty Springfield&#8217;s now more celebrated version. More suggestive than sleazy, though. </p>
<p>It felt like there was a real glut of sex-sax 45s in &#8217;78, with B Joel&#8217;s Just The Way You Are top of the heap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a tanned rested and unlogged lørd sükråt wötsît</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644251</link>
		<dc:creator>a tanned rested and unlogged lørd sükråt wötsît</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644251</guid>
		<description>Does anyone on the panel know when this species of late-nite sex-sax became a thing? I notice Daddino mentioned Mingus -- did he start it? (Awesome if so...) And Gato Barbieri&#039;s soundtrack for Last Tango in Paris was knida notoriois at the time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone on the panel know when this species of late-nite sex-sax became a thing? I notice Daddino mentioned Mingus &#8212; did he start it? (Awesome if so&#8230;) And Gato Barbieri&#8217;s soundtrack for Last Tango in Paris was knida notoriois at the time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644249</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644249</guid>
		<description>I love &quot;Careless Whisper&quot; because it&#039;s basically a Sade song. Not quite as much as I love Sade, but an easy 9. I don&#039;t agree with the &quot;raw feeling&quot; vs &quot;smooth production&quot; argument - the slick, smooth, adult glide of the sax/congas/synths is the perfect frame for the grown-up emotion of the song.

(NB: I hate all Wham songs that I&#039;ve heard, especially that awful &quot;Go-Go&quot; single that I didn&#039;t have time to hate on when it came up.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love &#8220;Careless Whisper&#8221; because it&#8217;s basically a Sade song. Not quite as much as I love Sade, but an easy 9. I don&#8217;t agree with the &#8220;raw feeling&#8221; vs &#8220;smooth production&#8221; argument &#8211; the slick, smooth, adult glide of the sax/congas/synths is the perfect frame for the grown-up emotion of the song.</p>
<p>(NB: I hate all Wham songs that I&#8217;ve heard, especially that awful &#8220;Go-Go&#8221; single that I didn&#8217;t have time to hate on when it came up.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a tanned rested and unlogged lørd sükråt wötsît</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644248</link>
		<dc:creator>a tanned rested and unlogged lørd sükråt wötsît</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644248</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve: 

Actually, there is a kind of embargo on starting discussions of upcoming songs till they actually come up -- it usually comes with warnings about bunnies, for reasons lost to the mists of mentalism.

In my opinion REAL men don&#039;t need any stupid testosterone to be manly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve: </p>
<p>Actually, there is a kind of embargo on starting discussions of upcoming songs till they actually come up &#8212; it usually comes with warnings about bunnies, for reasons lost to the mists of mentalism.</p>
<p>In my opinion REAL men don&#8217;t need any stupid testosterone to be manly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erithian</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644245</link>
		<dc:creator>Erithian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644245</guid>
		<description>Hmm, you might need the Sandi Thom tin hat for this, Steve...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, you might need the Sandi Thom tin hat for this, Steve&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644244</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644244</guid>
		<description>Oh - I almost forgot - guess what&#039;s coming next? Stevie Wonder I believe! This should be good. Another Million Selling LOVE SONG. 

If Tom was a sexy woman, he&#039;d give it maybe....8 ?
The male Tom can only give it...let&#039;s see...I predict...3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh &#8211; I almost forgot &#8211; guess what&#8217;s coming next? Stevie Wonder I believe! This should be good. Another Million Selling LOVE SONG. </p>
<p>If Tom was a sexy woman, he&#8217;d give it maybe&#8230;.8 ?<br />
The male Tom can only give it&#8230;let&#8217;s see&#8230;I predict&#8230;3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644242</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644242</guid>
		<description>This is my theory of Toms scoring Method:

1) Two Tribes - a really beefy MASCULINE song if ever there was one - you can hear it literally oozing testosterone!!!
Tom is a man, he gives it 10.

C/F

2) Careless Whisper - Love song - oestrogen for miles around - FEMININE song.
Tom is a man, he gives it 7.

For me, both songs are each a masterpiece deserving 10, and yet if I was told I can only give 10 to one of them, it would be TT.(I&#039;m a man, by the way)

Much as you may protest over this generalisation - I defy any of you say that no songs have a gender bias that would affect your judgement, no matter what you may think about the &quot;quality&quot; of the production etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is my theory of Toms scoring Method:</p>
<p>1) Two Tribes &#8211; a really beefy MASCULINE song if ever there was one &#8211; you can hear it literally oozing testosterone!!!<br />
Tom is a man, he gives it 10.</p>
<p>C/F</p>
<p>2) Careless Whisper &#8211; Love song &#8211; oestrogen for miles around &#8211; FEMININE song.<br />
Tom is a man, he gives it 7.</p>
<p>For me, both songs are each a masterpiece deserving 10, and yet if I was told I can only give 10 to one of them, it would be TT.(I&#8217;m a man, by the way)</p>
<p>Much as you may protest over this generalisation &#8211; I defy any of you say that no songs have a gender bias that would affect your judgement, no matter what you may think about the &#8220;quality&#8221; of the production etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elsa</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-644118</link>
		<dc:creator>Elsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-644118</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s both a great and terrible record - great in construction and performance; terrible not due to any particular element but as Pete said, the overall &quot;syrupy production.&quot;  Part of this effect is the Spano-kitsch sound it has in common with Madge&#039;s &quot;Las Isla Bonita,&quot; though I like that song less.  Heard &quot;Whisper&quot; on the radio recently and the impressive and appalling sides of it rang loud and clear.  I&#039;d imagine most songwriters would be pleased to dream up something of this quality however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s both a great and terrible record &#8211; great in construction and performance; terrible not due to any particular element but as Pete said, the overall &#8220;syrupy production.&#8221;  Part of this effect is the Spano-kitsch sound it has in common with Madge&#8217;s &#8220;Las Isla Bonita,&#8221; though I like that song less.  Heard &#8220;Whisper&#8221; on the radio recently and the impressive and appalling sides of it rang loud and clear.  I&#8217;d imagine most songwriters would be pleased to dream up something of this quality however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyPandy</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-643896</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyPandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-643896</guid>
		<description>&#039;Club Tropicana&#039; excepted I wasn&#039;t converted to George Michael until &#039;Listen Without Prejudice&#039; (although his next SOLO number - nb not that apalling duet -has since become one of my favourite tracks of all time) but since then he&#039;s become one of my favourite figures in popular music.

That being said however I&#039;ve always found this track quite cringeworthy and in particular have always found the middle eight about &#039;lose this crowd&#039; etc particularly annoying - to me its not a culmination of a great track but more like a cynical (and quite predictable in its structure) attempt at wringing out very fake emotion.
The complete antithesis of the honesty of the majority of his tracks since &#039;Prejudice&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Club Tropicana&#8217; excepted I wasn&#8217;t converted to George Michael until &#8216;Listen Without Prejudice&#8217; (although his next SOLO number &#8211; nb not that apalling duet -has since become one of my favourite tracks of all time) but since then he&#8217;s become one of my favourite figures in popular music.</p>
<p>That being said however I&#8217;ve always found this track quite cringeworthy and in particular have always found the middle eight about &#8216;lose this crowd&#8217; etc particularly annoying &#8211; to me its not a culmination of a great track but more like a cynical (and quite predictable in its structure) attempt at wringing out very fake emotion.<br />
The complete antithesis of the honesty of the majority of his tracks since &#8216;Prejudice&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conrad</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/08/george-michael-careless-whisper/#comment-643787</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=15033#comment-643787</guid>
		<description>&quot;Careless Whisper&quot; reached Number 1 exactly 25 years ago today</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Careless Whisper&#8221; reached Number 1 exactly 25 years ago today</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

