<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MEN AT WORK &#8211; &#8220;Down Under&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:27:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lonepilgrim</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-918437</link>
		<dc:creator>lonepilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 09:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-918437</guid>
		<description>From our legal correspondent:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/07/men-at-work-lose-appeal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From our legal correspondent:<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/07/men-at-work-lose-appeal" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/07/men-at-work-lose-appeal?referer=');">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/07/men-at-work-lose-appeal</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-708285</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-708285</guid>
		<description>&quot;A statute of limitations restricted Larrikin from seeking royalties earned before 2002.&quot; The band will be relieved about that, at least. Even five percent of its total earnings since 1982 would have been daunting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A statute of limitations restricted Larrikin from seeking royalties earned before 2002.&#8221; The band will be relieved about that, at least. Even five percent of its total earnings since 1982 would have been daunting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lonepilgrim</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-708265</link>
		<dc:creator>lonepilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 07:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-708265</guid>
		<description>swanstep @98 was right - they&#039;ve awarded a 5% share of the Down Under profit:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/jul/06/men-at-work-down-under</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>swanstep @98 was right &#8211; they&#8217;ve awarded a 5% share of the Down Under profit:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/jul/06/men-at-work-down-under" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/jul/06/men-at-work-down-under?referer=');">http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/jul/06/men-at-work-down-under</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MildredBumble</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-704277</link>
		<dc:creator>MildredBumble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-704277</guid>
		<description>Funny thing, reading about the Kookaburra plagiarism  - one Karel Fialka completely ripped off MAW&#039;s Down Under flute bit for his appalling car-crash of a hit that mixed Mary Whitehouse sensiblities with his square-eyed brat lisping his fave telly: &quot;Hey Matthew&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny thing, reading about the Kookaburra plagiarism  &#8211; one Karel Fialka completely ripped off MAW&#8217;s Down Under flute bit for his appalling car-crash of a hit that mixed Mary Whitehouse sensiblities with his square-eyed brat lisping his fave telly: &#8220;Hey Matthew&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snif</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-673716</link>
		<dc:creator>Snif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-673716</guid>
		<description>&quot;...a 40-60% share of profits seems utterly insane on those grounds alone (settlement for 5% would be more like it in my view)...&quot;

The way these things normally go, IIRC, is that the litigants ask/demand a ridiculously unrealistic sum, then the lawyers for both sides haggle it down to something more appropriate - the thinking is usually that if you start big, there&#039;s the occasional chance you might finish big.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;a 40-60% share of profits seems utterly insane on those grounds alone (settlement for 5% would be more like it in my view)&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>The way these things normally go, IIRC, is that the litigants ask/demand a ridiculously unrealistic sum, then the lawyers for both sides haggle it down to something more appropriate &#8211; the thinking is usually that if you start big, there&#8217;s the occasional chance you might finish big.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-673535</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-673535</guid>
		<description>That case was settled long ago, lonepilgrim - it&#039;s why my US-purchased CD of &lt;i&gt;Under a Blood Red Sky&lt;/i&gt; doesn&#039;t have 30 seconds of my old LP. (To the great annoyance of early-&#039;90s me who foolishly sold the old LP before listening to the newly purchased CD.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That case was settled long ago, lonepilgrim &#8211; it&#8217;s why my US-purchased CD of <i>Under a Blood Red Sky</i> doesn&#8217;t have 30 seconds of my old LP. (To the great annoyance of early-&#8217;90s me who foolishly sold the old LP before listening to the newly purchased CD.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lonepilgrim</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-673529</link>
		<dc:creator>lonepilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-673529</guid>
		<description>re105 any legal proceedings by Steven Sondheim against Bono would be warmly welcomed in these quarters though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re105 any legal proceedings by Steven Sondheim against Bono would be warmly welcomed in these quarters though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-673524</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-673524</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/music/men-at-work-fight-rip-off-ruling/story-e6frfn09-1225826972739&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Justice Jacobson said&lt;/a&gt; that Hay&#039;s admission he morphed the two songs during some concerts in 2002 helped make his decision. &quot;Perhaps the clearest illustration of the objective similarity is to be found in Mr Hay&#039;s frank admission of a causal connection between the two melodies and the fact that he sang the relevant bars of Kookaburra when performing Down Under at a number of concerts over a period of time from about 2002,&quot; Justice Jacobson wrote.&lt;/i&gt;

Gah! Bono morphed &quot;Electric Co.&quot; into &quot;Send in the Clowns&quot; during the Red Rocks concerts, but that didn&#039;t make them the same or even similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><a href="http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/music/men-at-work-fight-rip-off-ruling/story-e6frfn09-1225826972739" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.news.com.au/entertainment/music/men-at-work-fight-rip-off-ruling/story-e6frfn09-1225826972739?referer=');">Justice Jacobson said</a> that Hay&#8217;s admission he morphed the two songs during some concerts in 2002 helped make his decision. &#8220;Perhaps the clearest illustration of the objective similarity is to be found in Mr Hay&#8217;s frank admission of a causal connection between the two melodies and the fact that he sang the relevant bars of Kookaburra when performing Down Under at a number of concerts over a period of time from about 2002,&#8221; Justice Jacobson wrote.</i></p>
<p>Gah! Bono morphed &#8220;Electric Co.&#8221; into &#8220;Send in the Clowns&#8221; during the Red Rocks concerts, but that didn&#8217;t make them the same or even similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-673512</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-673512</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/men-at-works-colin-hays-statement-on-court-battle-over-down-under-and-kookaburra-in-full/story-e6frf7jo-1225826917098&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Colin Hay&#039;s response&lt;/a&gt; deserves attention.

I wonder who was using 210.10.199.224 on 31/10/06. (I miscopied the IP address above, for some reason.) It just resolves to an Australian ISP, so the trail goes cold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/men-at-works-colin-hays-statement-on-court-battle-over-down-under-and-kookaburra-in-full/story-e6frf7jo-1225826917098" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.heraldsun.com.au/news/men-at-works-colin-hays-statement-on-court-battle-over-down-under-and-kookaburra-in-full/story-e6frf7jo-1225826917098?referer=');">Colin Hay&#8217;s response</a> deserves attention.</p>
<p>I wonder who was using 210.10.199.224 on 31/10/06. (I miscopied the IP address above, for some reason.) It just resolves to an Australian ISP, so the trail goes cold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-673507</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-673507</guid>
		<description>We can rest easy: Larrikin &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_display/industry/e3i9f46c57380aa314fc5df4e772e73d2a6&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;launched their proceedings&lt;/a&gt; in 2008. But that Wikipedia entry is still in the frame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can rest easy: Larrikin <a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_display/industry/e3i9f46c57380aa314fc5df4e772e73d2a6" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_display/industry/e3i9f46c57380aa314fc5df4e772e73d2a6?referer=');">launched their proceedings</a> in 2008. But that Wikipedia entry is still in the frame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-673504</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-673504</guid>
		<description>I bet that the Wikipedia entry that Davey noticed up-thread (before the lawsuit arose*) was what tipped Larrikin off that they had a potential goldmine on their hands. They&#039;ve owned &quot;Kookaburra&quot; since 1990 and the similarity only occurred to them now? After a bit of hunting through the Wikipedia page&#039;s edit history, the claimed similarity with &quot;Kookaburra&quot; appears to have been added on &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Down_Under_%28song%29&amp;action=historysubmit&amp;diff=84827870&amp;oldid=84767935&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;31 October 2006&lt;/a&gt; by an anonymous contributor (and completely unsourced, at that). I hope &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/210.10.199.224&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;210.10.994.244&lt;/a&gt; is proud of themselves. Their only contribution, yet!

*Horrible thought: given the delay between 31 October 2006 and July 2009, perhaps &lt;i&gt;this thread&lt;/i&gt; was what actually tipped Larrikin off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet that the Wikipedia entry that Davey noticed up-thread (before the lawsuit arose*) was what tipped Larrikin off that they had a potential goldmine on their hands. They&#8217;ve owned &#8220;Kookaburra&#8221; since 1990 and the similarity only occurred to them now? After a bit of hunting through the Wikipedia page&#8217;s edit history, the claimed similarity with &#8220;Kookaburra&#8221; appears to have been added on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Down_Under_%28song%29&amp;action=historysubmit&amp;diff=84827870&amp;oldid=84767935" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Down_Under_28song_29_amp_action=historysubmit_amp_diff=84827870_amp_oldid=84767935&amp;referer=');">31 October 2006</a> by an anonymous contributor (and completely unsourced, at that). I hope <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/210.10.199.224" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Contributions/210.10.199.224?referer=');">210.10.994.244</a> is proud of themselves. Their only contribution, yet!</p>
<p>*Horrible thought: given the delay between 31 October 2006 and July 2009, perhaps <i>this thread</i> was what actually tipped Larrikin off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-673502</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-673502</guid>
		<description>The riff &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mg.co.za/article/2010-02-05-men-at-work-slam-greed-in-plagiarism-case&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wasn&#039;t even incorporated into the song&lt;/a&gt; by Hay and Strykert, but by the band&#039;s flautist Greg Ham.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The riff <a href="http://www.mg.co.za/article/2010-02-05-men-at-work-slam-greed-in-plagiarism-case" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.mg.co.za/article/2010-02-05-men-at-work-slam-greed-in-plagiarism-case?referer=');">wasn&#8217;t even incorporated into the song</a> by Hay and Strykert, but by the band&#8217;s flautist Greg Ham.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thefatgit</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-673485</link>
		<dc:creator>thefatgit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-673485</guid>
		<description>The issue of copyright seems to be a ticking timebomb these days. What with the clumsy and unweildly Digital Britain bill (clause 17 is an attempt to future-proof the legislation, but looks like some kind of draconian measure dreamt up by George Orwell) being read in the Lords, and these occasional plagiarism cases that crop up from time to time...

...we should be asking in the context of the current climate, just how artists should be paid, and more importantly who should be paying them?
Is the current copyright law adequate? And can publishers and distributors force internet providers to cut off an entire household&#039;s broadband, with total impunity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue of copyright seems to be a ticking timebomb these days. What with the clumsy and unweildly Digital Britain bill (clause 17 is an attempt to future-proof the legislation, but looks like some kind of draconian measure dreamt up by George Orwell) being read in the Lords, and these occasional plagiarism cases that crop up from time to time&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;we should be asking in the context of the current climate, just how artists should be paid, and more importantly who should be paying them?<br />
Is the current copyright law adequate? And can publishers and distributors force internet providers to cut off an entire household&#8217;s broadband, with total impunity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-673474</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-673474</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe how annoyed this has made me. As you say, swanstep, the riff is a tiny quote within &quot;Down Under&quot;, so minor that the connection had never occurred to me before this story broke last year; and I&#039;m guessing I&#039;m one of the last generation of Aussie kids who would have grown up singing &quot;Kookaburra&quot;. Its key line is &quot;Laugh, kookaburra, laugh, kookaburra, gay your life must be&quot;, and I can&#039;t see that getting much air post-1970s - not out of rampant homophobia, but out of embarrassment over the double entendre, which is so easily avoided by not teaching the song to littlies in the first place.

So if the 1970s were more or less &quot;Kookaburra&quot;&#039;s last laugh, even that tiny quote would be the only way anyone nowadays would hear anything from it. &quot;Kookaburra&quot;&#039;s author died in 1988, so her only immortality is in the memories of middle-aged-and-above Aussies like me... and in those few notes in &quot;Down Under&quot;.

So even if it &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; a conscious rip-off (which I&#039;m not convinced it was), I &lt;i&gt;don&#039;t care&lt;/i&gt;. I don&#039;t want to see Hay and Strykert bankrupted for the benefit of a copyright that has long since left a dead songwriter&#039;s ownership, which sixty percent of megabucks of long-spent royalties could easily do. In the grand scheme of things, &quot;Down Under&quot; matters more to Australia than &quot;Kookaburra&quot;, the legal wranglings of lawyers looking for their &quot;My Sweet Lord&quot; moment notwithstanding.

(&quot;My Sweet Lord&quot; mattered more, too.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe how annoyed this has made me. As you say, swanstep, the riff is a tiny quote within &#8220;Down Under&#8221;, so minor that the connection had never occurred to me before this story broke last year; and I&#8217;m guessing I&#8217;m one of the last generation of Aussie kids who would have grown up singing &#8220;Kookaburra&#8221;. Its key line is &#8220;Laugh, kookaburra, laugh, kookaburra, gay your life must be&#8221;, and I can&#8217;t see that getting much air post-1970s &#8211; not out of rampant homophobia, but out of embarrassment over the double entendre, which is so easily avoided by not teaching the song to littlies in the first place.</p>
<p>So if the 1970s were more or less &#8220;Kookaburra&#8221;&#8216;s last laugh, even that tiny quote would be the only way anyone nowadays would hear anything from it. &#8220;Kookaburra&#8221;&#8216;s author died in 1988, so her only immortality is in the memories of middle-aged-and-above Aussies like me&#8230; and in those few notes in &#8220;Down Under&#8221;.</p>
<p>So even if it <i>was</i> a conscious rip-off (which I&#8217;m not convinced it was), I <i>don&#8217;t care</i>. I don&#8217;t want to see Hay and Strykert bankrupted for the benefit of a copyright that has long since left a dead songwriter&#8217;s ownership, which sixty percent of megabucks of long-spent royalties could easily do. In the grand scheme of things, &#8220;Down Under&#8221; matters more to Australia than &#8220;Kookaburra&#8221;, the legal wranglings of lawyers looking for their &#8220;My Sweet Lord&#8221; moment notwithstanding.</p>
<p>(&#8220;My Sweet Lord&#8221; mattered more, too.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swanstep</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-673456</link>
		<dc:creator>swanstep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-673456</guid>
		<description>Wow, the trilling flute phrase is just a bar or two (albeit repeated), so a 40-60% share of profits seems utterly insane on those grounds alone (settlement for 5% would be more like it in my view). Also, since it&#039;s the rhythm of the trill that&#039;s the &#039;tell&#039;, it should be material that essentially the same rhythm (in upper registers) is *all over* versions of the trad. hymn, Gloria in excelsis Deo, including Vivaldi&#039;s. (I imagine that the original girl guide author would concede that, of course, she was building on trad, hymns, were she here.) My money&#039;s on a vigorous appeal followed by settlement at a more reasonable figure.

@Rory. &#039;Laugh, IP layers laugh.&#039; Brilliant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, the trilling flute phrase is just a bar or two (albeit repeated), so a 40-60% share of profits seems utterly insane on those grounds alone (settlement for 5% would be more like it in my view). Also, since it&#8217;s the rhythm of the trill that&#8217;s the &#8216;tell&#8217;, it should be material that essentially the same rhythm (in upper registers) is *all over* versions of the trad. hymn, Gloria in excelsis Deo, including Vivaldi&#8217;s. (I imagine that the original girl guide author would concede that, of course, she was building on trad, hymns, were she here.) My money&#8217;s on a vigorous appeal followed by settlement at a more reasonable figure.</p>
<p>@Rory. &#8216;Laugh, IP layers laugh.&#8217; Brilliant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wichita lineman</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-673382</link>
		<dc:creator>wichita lineman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-673382</guid>
		<description>Cos the flute &#039;riff&#039; is the bit everyone remembers... 

The band should be compensated for the free publicity they gave Vegemite. How many non-Australians had heard of it before 1983?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cos the flute &#8216;riff&#8217; is the bit everyone remembers&#8230; </p>
<p>The band should be compensated for the free publicity they gave Vegemite. How many non-Australians had heard of it before 1983?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-673349</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-673349</guid>
		<description>Bah. Hope the damages make up for all the biscuit sales they&#039;ll lose... although who knows, maybe the nation will side with the Guides.

Writing songs with a mate down under,
Looked around for some riffs to plunder.
Said to him, &quot;Do you think we&#039;ll risk it?&quot;
He just smiled and handed me a Girl Guide biscuit.

And I said, &quot;Ohhh! &#039;Kookaburra&#039; is huge down under,
And one man&#039;s &#039;quote&#039; is a judge&#039;s &#039;blunder&#039;.
Can&#039;t you hear the reporters thunder?
We better run, we better take cover.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah. Hope the damages make up for all the biscuit sales they&#8217;ll lose&#8230; although who knows, maybe the nation will side with the Guides.</p>
<p>Writing songs with a mate down under,<br />
Looked around for some riffs to plunder.<br />
Said to him, &#8220;Do you think we&#8217;ll risk it?&#8221;<br />
He just smiled and handed me a Girl Guide biscuit.</p>
<p>And I said, &#8220;Ohhh! &#8216;Kookaburra&#8217; is huge down under,<br />
And one man&#8217;s &#8216;quote&#8217; is a judge&#8217;s &#8216;blunder&#8217;.<br />
Can&#8217;t you hear the reporters thunder?<br />
We better run, we better take cover.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-673305</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-673305</guid>
		<description>&quot;A big win for the underdog&quot; where &quot;underdog&quot; = &quot;a publishing company that saw an opportunity to buy a song copyright off the Girl Guides&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A big win for the underdog&#8221; where &#8220;underdog&#8221; = &#8220;a publishing company that saw an opportunity to buy a song copyright off the Girl Guides&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: punctum</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-673294</link>
		<dc:creator>punctum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-673294</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8497433.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Whoops&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8497433.stm" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8497433.stm?referer=');">Whoops</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tooncgull</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-655661</link>
		<dc:creator>Tooncgull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-655661</guid>
		<description>#61 Davey - re the appearance of Colin Hay on Scrubs - yes, I got quite excited by that, especially as he plays the far superior (to &quot;Downunder&quot;) song &quot;Overkill&quot; in that episode. I&#039;d long forgotten MAW at that stage, and rushed out to buy Cargo on CD purely for that track! Sadly &quot;Overkill&quot; is the only track on the album worth having.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#61 Davey &#8211; re the appearance of Colin Hay on Scrubs &#8211; yes, I got quite excited by that, especially as he plays the far superior (to &#8220;Downunder&#8221;) song &#8220;Overkill&#8221; in that episode. I&#8217;d long forgotten MAW at that stage, and rushed out to buy Cargo on CD purely for that track! Sadly &#8220;Overkill&#8221; is the only track on the album worth having.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-639723</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-639723</guid>
		<description>Kookaburra&#039;s writ in the Old Bai-ley,
Merry, merry king of the flute is he,
Laugh, IP lawyers, laugh, IP lawyers,
Pay for you must we.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kookaburra&#8217;s writ in the Old Bai-ley,<br />
Merry, merry king of the flute is he,<br />
Laugh, IP lawyers, laugh, IP lawyers,<br />
Pay for you must we.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lonepilgrim</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-639719</link>
		<dc:creator>lonepilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-639719</guid>
		<description>..and seems like someone else made the Kookaburra connection:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8175974.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..and seems like someone else made the Kookaburra connection:</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8175974.stm" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8175974.stm?referer=');">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8175974.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lonepilgrim</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-619027</link>
		<dc:creator>lonepilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-619027</guid>
		<description>♯89 &#039;Let&#039;s forget&#039;  has lived up to it&#039;s title</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>♯89 &#8216;Let&#8217;s forget&#8217;  has lived up to it&#8217;s title</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wichita lineman</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-619013</link>
		<dc:creator>wichita lineman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 11:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-619013</guid>
		<description>Ronco alert: opening track on Chart Runners (part 2) followed by:
Tunnel Of Love - Fun Boy Three
Sexual Healing - Marvin Gaye
Hold Me Tighter In The Rain - Billy Griffin
Cry Boy Cry - Blue Zoo
Breakaway - Tracey Ullman
Endlessly - John Foxx
Let&#039;s Forget - White &amp; Torch
European Female - The Stranglers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronco alert: opening track on Chart Runners (part 2) followed by:<br />
Tunnel Of Love &#8211; Fun Boy Three<br />
Sexual Healing &#8211; Marvin Gaye<br />
Hold Me Tighter In The Rain &#8211; Billy Griffin<br />
Cry Boy Cry &#8211; Blue Zoo<br />
Breakaway &#8211; Tracey Ullman<br />
Endlessly &#8211; John Foxx<br />
Let&#8217;s Forget &#8211; White &amp; Torch<br />
European Female &#8211; The Stranglers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lonepilgrim</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/05/men-at-work-down-under/#comment-619008</link>
		<dc:creator>lonepilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 11:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=14203#comment-619008</guid>
		<description>Watching the &#039;Down under&#039; video yesterday I experienced a Proustian rush equal to memories of Tingha and Tucker when I saw &#039;Tanelorn rules&#039; on the front of the VW combi. It brought back memories of devouring Moorcock books in my early teens - probably while rocking  out to Yes and Hawkwind on headphones. According to the wikipedia entry for Tanelorn:

The music video by Men At Work of the song Down Under shows &quot;Tanelorn Rules&quot; on the front of a van,perhaps referring to the Tanelorn Music Festival, held on the October Labour Day holiday weekend in 1981 near Karuah, north of Newcastle in Australia. This festival was subsequently regarded by some as being the &#039;end&#039; of the age of Aquarius, as subsequent Australian outdoor festivals such as Narara &#039;85 had much of the atmosphere of an outdoor &#039;beerbarn&#039;, dominated by pub rock.

I&#039;m still hoping that Martin will revive his Sci-fi authors thread - maybe looking at Moorcock?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching the &#8216;Down under&#8217; video yesterday I experienced a Proustian rush equal to memories of Tingha and Tucker when I saw &#8216;Tanelorn rules&#8217; on the front of the VW combi. It brought back memories of devouring Moorcock books in my early teens &#8211; probably while rocking  out to Yes and Hawkwind on headphones. According to the wikipedia entry for Tanelorn:</p>
<p>The music video by Men At Work of the song Down Under shows &#8220;Tanelorn Rules&#8221; on the front of a van,perhaps referring to the Tanelorn Music Festival, held on the October Labour Day holiday weekend in 1981 near Karuah, north of Newcastle in Australia. This festival was subsequently regarded by some as being the &#8216;end&#8217; of the age of Aquarius, as subsequent Australian outdoor festivals such as Narara &#8217;85 had much of the atmosphere of an outdoor &#8216;beerbarn&#8217;, dominated by pub rock.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still hoping that Martin will revive his Sci-fi authors thread &#8211; maybe looking at Moorcock?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

