Comments on: Cereblog

By: DV

DV — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:40:30 +0000

Unlike everyone else, I thought Cerebus was great from the word go, though I did read the early issues after the later ones.

By: chap

chap — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:27:26 +0000

Nah, he reads em all, just doesn’t blog every single issue.

By: Alan

Alan — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:57:09 +0000

*GASP* although it looks like only every copy that he has – some patchiness at the beginning i notice.

By: chap

chap — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:43:00 +0000

Speaking of crazy quixotic blogging, have you come across this guy who’s reading every prog of 2000AD?

http://progslog.blogspot.com/

By: Andrew Farrell

Andrew Farrell — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:14:51 +0000

I would also be fairly interested!

By: Pete Baran

Pete Baran — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:51:18 +0000

Science has come on in leaps and bounds since then, so i daresay it will be even more scientific, and yes martin, you would have to be in the mix.

By: Martin Skidmore

Martin Skidmore — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:46:16 +0000

As the man who nominated the #1 way back then (was it really 2003?) I want to be involved again, and I hope the method is every bit as scientific.

By: Pete

Pete — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:12:27 +0000

Yes it is, but it was as some sort of riposte to Popular, and I don’t see it throwing up films that are even that much of their time, let alone interesting. There are loads of great Oscar winners, but it rarely corresponds to what has become the canon. It would also all be American.

I have another project lingering, but I am seeing if I can just up my posting rate at the moment with a couple of short runs and then head for the big one (it strikes me that the Top 100 films from 2003 is now six years out of date and should be redone in a new scientific manner).

By: Tom

Tom — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:53:41 +0000

http://bestpicturederby.blogspot.com/

Blogging every Oscar Best Picture nominee – Pete this is something I know you’ve threatened to do on occasion.