<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ADAM AND THE ANTS &#8211; &#8220;Stand And Deliver&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:12:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-692112</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-692112</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll do that if you turn the volume up to 11 on &quot;Bad Romance&quot; Mo0g ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll do that if you turn the volume up to 11 on &#8220;Bad Romance&#8221; Mo0g ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo0g</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-692111</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo0g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-692111</guid>
		<description>I think the &quot;problem&quot; with looking back at Adam&#039;s image around this time, more specifically Prince Charming, is that to a casual observer it looked, well, childish.  At the time however I dont think generally to adults it did, as adults then were used to the whole glam rock, and prog rock images.  To kids and young adults it came like a bolt from the blue and there is no doubt his image was a big factor.
However, were you fortunate to buy S&amp;D, you would have found &#039;Beat my Guest&#039; on the flip side.  Had you bought Prince Charming (single) you would have found &#039;Christian Dior&#039;, Antrap had &#039;Friends&#039; on the b-side.  All these songs were re-recordings of Adam&#039;s earlier songs, and once you listened to these your world would never quite be the same again.  Kiddie pop they were most definitely not.

On face value S&amp;D was/is a great visceral pop song.  Marco (Pirroni) once told me there are something like 17 guitar tracks, an 80&#039;s wall of sound.  Perhaps people who dont &quot;get it&quot; might try playing it just once more with the volume up to 11.  You&#039;ll hear something a little different to Lady Gaga.  You&#039;ll hopefully see what thousands of 40+ yr olds *still* see in the music!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the &#8220;problem&#8221; with looking back at Adam&#8217;s image around this time, more specifically Prince Charming, is that to a casual observer it looked, well, childish.  At the time however I dont think generally to adults it did, as adults then were used to the whole glam rock, and prog rock images.  To kids and young adults it came like a bolt from the blue and there is no doubt his image was a big factor.<br />
However, were you fortunate to buy S&amp;D, you would have found &#8216;Beat my Guest&#8217; on the flip side.  Had you bought Prince Charming (single) you would have found &#8216;Christian Dior&#8217;, Antrap had &#8216;Friends&#8217; on the b-side.  All these songs were re-recordings of Adam&#8217;s earlier songs, and once you listened to these your world would never quite be the same again.  Kiddie pop they were most definitely not.</p>
<p>On face value S&amp;D was/is a great visceral pop song.  Marco (Pirroni) once told me there are something like 17 guitar tracks, an 80&#8242;s wall of sound.  Perhaps people who dont &#8220;get it&#8221; might try playing it just once more with the volume up to 11.  You&#8217;ll hear something a little different to Lady Gaga.  You&#8217;ll hopefully see what thousands of 40+ yr olds *still* see in the music!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooksie</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-676761</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooksie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-676761</guid>
		<description>Oh, and this - Lex # 83:

&quot;w/Gaga, La Roux and Adam Ant especially, you feel that it’s all dependent on the heavily-signposted “craziness”&quot;

Adam was nothing like them. He never dressed up to be &#039;wacky&#039;, and everything he wore came straight from history (part of his appeal), unlike the impractical clothes of the &quot;Look at me&quot; artists you mentioned. By lumping them together I&#039;m really not sure you&#039;re &lt;I&gt;getting&lt;/i&gt; him.

This - Lex # 84:

&quot;Actually I just realised what ‘Stand &amp; Deliver’ ACTUALLY reminds me of – it’s Kate Bush’s ‘Sat In Your Lap’ if it was somehow made really terrible and clumsy, and performed by an idiot instead of a genius.&quot;

Except that S&amp;D predates SIYL, and the drumming on the latter was clearly influenced by Adam and the Ants who were the breakout group of the day. And there is nothing else similar about the songs at all. In fact, I don&#039;t really think the drums are all that similar; S&amp;D has heavier more rhythmic drumming to the more clear-cut off-kilter drums of SIYL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and this &#8211; Lex # 83:</p>
<p>&#8220;w/Gaga, La Roux and Adam Ant especially, you feel that it’s all dependent on the heavily-signposted “craziness”&#8221;</p>
<p>Adam was nothing like them. He never dressed up to be &#8216;wacky&#8217;, and everything he wore came straight from history (part of his appeal), unlike the impractical clothes of the &#8220;Look at me&#8221; artists you mentioned. By lumping them together I&#8217;m really not sure you&#8217;re <i>getting</i> him.</p>
<p>This &#8211; Lex # 84:</p>
<p>&#8220;Actually I just realised what ‘Stand &amp; Deliver’ ACTUALLY reminds me of – it’s Kate Bush’s ‘Sat In Your Lap’ if it was somehow made really terrible and clumsy, and performed by an idiot instead of a genius.&#8221;</p>
<p>Except that S&amp;D predates SIYL, and the drumming on the latter was clearly influenced by Adam and the Ants who were the breakout group of the day. And there is nothing else similar about the songs at all. In fact, I don&#8217;t really think the drums are all that similar; S&amp;D has heavier more rhythmic drumming to the more clear-cut off-kilter drums of SIYL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooksie</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-676067</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooksie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-676067</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t got much to add here. Don&#039;t agree with the comparison to modern R &amp; B artists with their multi-million dollar backing and their ego-as-music self-aggrandising. No, Adam doesn&#039;t fit in the &#039;slickness&#039; of the modern world, but I&#039;m willing to bet if he came along today he&#039;d have the same visceral impact that he did then, 14 year-olds would still love him, and he&#039;d probably stand out &lt;i&gt;more&lt;/i&gt; because of the homogenised nature of the charts of recent years. He was big back when there was stiff competition in the top ten from &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; types of music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t got much to add here. Don&#8217;t agree with the comparison to modern R &amp; B artists with their multi-million dollar backing and their ego-as-music self-aggrandising. No, Adam doesn&#8217;t fit in the &#8216;slickness&#8217; of the modern world, but I&#8217;m willing to bet if he came along today he&#8217;d have the same visceral impact that he did then, 14 year-olds would still love him, and he&#8217;d probably stand out <i>more</i> because of the homogenised nature of the charts of recent years. He was big back when there was stiff competition in the top ten from <i>all</i> types of music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erithian</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-643520</link>
		<dc:creator>Erithian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-643520</guid>
		<description>Channel 4 Top 100 Watch: haven&#039;t done this for a while so will catch up.  In the official list of the top-selling singles in the UK in the first 50 years of the singles chart, &quot;Stand and Deliver&quot; was placed 83rd, apparently a mere 15,000 sales shy of a million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Channel 4 Top 100 Watch: haven&#8217;t done this for a while so will catch up.  In the official list of the top-selling singles in the UK in the first 50 years of the singles chart, &#8220;Stand and Deliver&#8221; was placed 83rd, apparently a mere 15,000 sales shy of a million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a tanned rested and unlogged lørd sükråt wötsît</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-614266</link>
		<dc:creator>a tanned rested and unlogged lørd sükråt wötsît</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-614266</guid>
		<description>he was called dunk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he was called dunk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-614263</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-614263</guid>
		<description>So which of: 

- small girl
- squeaky little boy with flared nostrils and midland accent
- lardy football fan
- specky
- distinguishing-featureless ur-weetaskin

looked most like Swellsy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So which of: </p>
<p>- small girl<br />
- squeaky little boy with flared nostrils and midland accent<br />
- lardy football fan<br />
- specky<br />
- distinguishing-featureless ur-weetaskin</p>
<p>looked most like Swellsy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a tanned rested and unlogged lørd sükråt wötsît</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-614059</link>
		<dc:creator>a tanned rested and unlogged lørd sükråt wötsît</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 23:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-614059</guid>
		<description>i had a plaster model of the weetabix skinhead who looked most like swellsy -- it came with a kit and paint and everything 

my sister broke it (i forget if accidentally or by way of art critique)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i had a plaster model of the weetabix skinhead who looked most like swellsy &#8212; it came with a kit and paint and everything </p>
<p>my sister broke it (i forget if accidentally or by way of art critique)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark M</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-614058</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 23:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-614058</guid>
		<description>Re 105: Hmmm... That would make sense, as it involved many of the same basic elements, although the jeans were a very different cut and down the Wag we&#039;re talking DM shoes as opposed to big boots; on the other hand, I hadn&#039;t even mentioned the bomber jackets, which both groups shared, and braces... 
But all I can say is that it never read as skinhead, especially as it usually went with a reasonable amount of hair, on the top of the head at least, if not the back&#039;n&#039;sides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re 105: Hmmm&#8230; That would make sense, as it involved many of the same basic elements, although the jeans were a very different cut and down the Wag we&#8217;re talking DM shoes as opposed to big boots; on the other hand, I hadn&#8217;t even mentioned the bomber jackets, which both groups shared, and braces&#8230;<br />
But all I can say is that it never read as skinhead, especially as it usually went with a reasonable amount of hair, on the top of the head at least, if not the back&#8217;n'sides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew F</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-614003</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-614003</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t White T-Shirt/Levis/DMs a skinhead thing poking through into fashion (that Persil ad/&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeC7BZgusw4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Weetabix Skins that I thought I&#039;d dreamt&lt;/a&gt;)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t White T-Shirt/Levis/DMs a skinhead thing poking through into fashion (that Persil ad/<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeC7BZgusw4" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeC7BZgusw4&amp;referer=');">the Weetabix Skins that I thought I&#8217;d dreamt</a>)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyPandy</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-609012</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyPandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-609012</guid>
		<description>102: yes that&#039;s bang on the slide into mediocrity in his book correlates more or less exactly with his accession to West End tastemaker.

If we&#039;re talking about lack of perspective however from a similar milieu Stuart Maconie takes some beating.In the pile of shite that is &#039;Pies and Prejudice&#039; (my excuse for reading it being that my Lancastrian girlfriend bought it me to wind me up!)he portrays himself as this member of the North Western proletariat adrift in a sea of insufferable South-Eastern avocado scoffing snobs. Seemingly failing to comprehend that its the age old influx of &#039;apirational&#039; newly middle-class people (including media-types like him) that give London and the south-east just the demographic he spends the whole book getting worked up about...

And failing to see that (going on there being approximately 20 million people in the south-east)that at least 10 million of these people would see a university educated, broadsheet-reading media-type like Maconie as &quot;a fahkin posh bastard&quot; Wigan origins or not...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>102: yes that&#8217;s bang on the slide into mediocrity in his book correlates more or less exactly with his accession to West End tastemaker.</p>
<p>If we&#8217;re talking about lack of perspective however from a similar milieu Stuart Maconie takes some beating.In the pile of shite that is &#8216;Pies and Prejudice&#8217; (my excuse for reading it being that my Lancastrian girlfriend bought it me to wind me up!)he portrays himself as this member of the North Western proletariat adrift in a sea of insufferable South-Eastern avocado scoffing snobs. Seemingly failing to comprehend that its the age old influx of &#8216;apirational&#8217; newly middle-class people (including media-types like him) that give London and the south-east just the demographic he spends the whole book getting worked up about&#8230;</p>
<p>And failing to see that (going on there being approximately 20 million people in the south-east)that at least 10 million of these people would see a university educated, broadsheet-reading media-type like Maconie as &#8220;a fahkin posh bastard&#8221; Wigan origins or not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark M</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-609005</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-609005</guid>
		<description>Also re 101: although the Hard Times article is frequently ridiculous, it does identify a couple of trends that would become important throughout decade: one being the look that eventually crystalised into the white T-shirt/Levis/DMs uniform; the other being, as discussed above, the sense that it was unlikely and foolish to presume that his generation was going to come up with anything better than Curtis and Coltrane, and so our best bet was to mint our versions, so all hail Terence Trent D&#039;Arby and  Courtney Pine…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also re 101: although the Hard Times article is frequently ridiculous, it does identify a couple of trends that would become important throughout decade: one being the look that eventually crystalised into the white T-shirt/Levis/DMs uniform; the other being, as discussed above, the sense that it was unlikely and foolish to presume that his generation was going to come up with anything better than Curtis and Coltrane, and so our best bet was to mint our versions, so all hail Terence Trent D&#8217;Arby and  Courtney Pine…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark M</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-609003</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-609003</guid>
		<description>Re 101: Elms seems to suffer from a weird lack of perspective – they were talking about the 1970s on his radio show the other day and it was the usual &quot;in the 70s we ate Smash and now we eat all this interesting stuff&quot;, which is more than partially true, of course, but what he couldn&#039;t grasp was that his trajectory – council estate to well-fed media establishment figure – was rare and personal*. I.e., some of us/our parents were eating brie and avocados in 1974 and plenty of people now (&amp; were long before the current downturn) are living primarily on oven chips. Haven&#039;t read his book, but it would make sense to me if it lost steam at the point where it switched from where he shared his fashion experiences with tens of thousands of other kids in outer London – and moved on where he imagines the rest of us were also writing for The Face and shacked up with pop stars... 

*This is quite common in the self-made, who like to credit sheer hard work rather than luck or skill as being the difference between themselves and those left behind, but you might expect something different in an LSE grad with intellectual interests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re 101: Elms seems to suffer from a weird lack of perspective – they were talking about the 1970s on his radio show the other day and it was the usual &#8220;in the 70s we ate Smash and now we eat all this interesting stuff&#8221;, which is more than partially true, of course, but what he couldn&#8217;t grasp was that his trajectory – council estate to well-fed media establishment figure – was rare and personal*. I.e., some of us/our parents were eating brie and avocados in 1974 and plenty of people now (&amp; were long before the current downturn) are living primarily on oven chips. Haven&#8217;t read his book, but it would make sense to me if it lost steam at the point where it switched from where he shared his fashion experiences with tens of thousands of other kids in outer London – and moved on where he imagines the rest of us were also writing for The Face and shacked up with pop stars&#8230; </p>
<p>*This is quite common in the self-made, who like to credit sheer hard work rather than luck or skill as being the difference between themselves and those left behind, but you might expect something different in an LSE grad with intellectual interests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyPandy</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-608998</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyPandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-608998</guid>
		<description>...and his (Robert Elms&#039;s) biography started so unbelievably well (for the first hundred pages or so I thought it was nigh on perfect) and then to put no finer point on it sort of went crap.Although on the London and south-east pre-house dance underground he definitely knows his stuff. And although he hated acid house and everything after it didn&#039;t stop him coming out with the classic description of the house/rave explosion as &quot;the revenge of the suburban soul boy&quot;.

I thought the &#039;Hard Times&#039; concept was pretty laughable though and his intoning of bad poetry before early Spandau Ballet concerts although in the latter case when I heard it on a CD it was so laughable it made me genuinely laugh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and his (Robert Elms&#8217;s) biography started so unbelievably well (for the first hundred pages or so I thought it was nigh on perfect) and then to put no finer point on it sort of went crap.Although on the London and south-east pre-house dance underground he definitely knows his stuff. And although he hated acid house and everything after it didn&#8217;t stop him coming out with the classic description of the house/rave explosion as &#8220;the revenge of the suburban soul boy&#8221;.</p>
<p>I thought the &#8216;Hard Times&#8217; concept was pretty laughable though and his intoning of bad poetry before early Spandau Ballet concerts although in the latter case when I heard it on a CD it was so laughable it made me genuinely laugh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark M</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-608781</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-608781</guid>
		<description>Bob Elms, bless him... endearing on the radio and completely aggravating as a writer or worse, a TV talking head.

The key bit in the Hard Times piece runs &quot;Youth Culture now represents not a rebellion but a tradition, or rather a serious of traditions that date back to the advent of the teenager... How can you rebel against the generation of Coltrane or Brando or MacInnes? What we have is a heritage you can draw succour and inspiration from.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob Elms, bless him&#8230; endearing on the radio and completely aggravating as a writer or worse, a TV talking head.</p>
<p>The key bit in the Hard Times piece runs &#8220;Youth Culture now represents not a rebellion but a tradition, or rather a serious of traditions that date back to the advent of the teenager&#8230; How can you rebel against the generation of Coltrane or Brando or MacInnes? What we have is a heritage you can draw succour and inspiration from.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-608739</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-608739</guid>
		<description>Weren&#039;t the biggest benefactors of the hard times thing Wham!?

(Sorry Bunny)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weren&#8217;t the biggest benefactors of the hard times thing Wham!?</p>
<p>(Sorry Bunny)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveM</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-608738</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-608738</guid>
		<description>&#039;hard times&#039; doesn&#039;t sound too bad either! but then all of the aforementioned things seem good to me and that there was no dominant style strikes me as high-ranking exhibit wrt why it was such a good time for pop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;hard times&#8217; doesn&#8217;t sound too bad either! but then all of the aforementioned things seem good to me and that there was no dominant style strikes me as high-ranking exhibit wrt why it was such a good time for pop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-608722</link>
		<dc:creator>pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-608722</guid>
		<description>haha yes &quot;hard times&quot; omg i had forgotten that fad (my old copies of the face are all shelved out of easy reach): cue big fashion-shoot of cute boys in expensive ripped jeans!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha yes &#8220;hard times&#8221; omg i had forgotten that fad (my old copies of the face are all shelved out of easy reach): cue big fashion-shoot of cute boys in expensive ripped jeans!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lonepilgrim</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-608720</link>
		<dc:creator>lonepilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-608720</guid>
		<description>as someone who grew up with Steve Priest of Sweet wearing a WW I German helmet with lip gloss and eyeliner I found Adam Ant&#039;s image to be quite restrained. 

I&#039;ve just dug out some copies of The Face magazine from 1982 and PLSC is right at #80 about how wide open the debate was about what was going to be the next dominant story. 
In the September 82 issue Robert Elms tries to stake a claim for what he labelled a &#039;Hard Times&#039; ,back-to-basics, aesthetic that abandoned the excess of the New Romantics and the zoot-suited followers of Kid Creole and others. Levi jeans and t-shirts are the preferred clothing and the musical roots cited are Gil Scott-Heron, John Coltrane, Fela Kuti and Curtis Mayfield. 
The same issue features Imagination adopting a hit-the-gym look, Kevin Rowland in Gypsy mode, Culture Club and Bananarama in bold prints and ABC in tweeds.

Musicians have always dressed up - some more bizarrely than others - but Adam foregrounded the process as a call-to-arms to encourage his audience to leave their drab lives behind. 
And, as I think I mentioned earlier I&#039;m pretty sure Prince nicked the regency look of the Purple Rain era from Adam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as someone who grew up with Steve Priest of Sweet wearing a WW I German helmet with lip gloss and eyeliner I found Adam Ant&#8217;s image to be quite restrained. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just dug out some copies of The Face magazine from 1982 and PLSC is right at #80 about how wide open the debate was about what was going to be the next dominant story.<br />
In the September 82 issue Robert Elms tries to stake a claim for what he labelled a &#8216;Hard Times&#8217; ,back-to-basics, aesthetic that abandoned the excess of the New Romantics and the zoot-suited followers of Kid Creole and others. Levi jeans and t-shirts are the preferred clothing and the musical roots cited are Gil Scott-Heron, John Coltrane, Fela Kuti and Curtis Mayfield.<br />
The same issue features Imagination adopting a hit-the-gym look, Kevin Rowland in Gypsy mode, Culture Club and Bananarama in bold prints and ABC in tweeds.</p>
<p>Musicians have always dressed up &#8211; some more bizarrely than others &#8211; but Adam foregrounded the process as a call-to-arms to encourage his audience to leave their drab lives behind.<br />
And, as I think I mentioned earlier I&#8217;m pretty sure Prince nicked the regency look of the Purple Rain era from Adam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-608704</link>
		<dc:creator>pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-608704</guid>
		<description>(i have to say -- as someone currently very &quot;busily&quot; engaged in a big important essay on what jazz meant in the UK in the 8os [good and bad] -- there is something distinctly weird and exciting about the fact that some of the most useful discussion for me to be reading as i write has been two successive adam ant threads! antscension!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(i have to say &#8212; as someone currently very &#8220;busily&#8221; engaged in a big important essay on what jazz meant in the UK in the 8os [good and bad] &#8212; there is something distinctly weird and exciting about the fact that some of the most useful discussion for me to be reading as i write has been two successive adam ant threads! antscension!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveM</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-608701</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-608701</guid>
		<description>I think my reaction to AA at the time, as a 4 year old (that sounds so absurd every time I write it ha ha*), was immediate compulsion and the afore-mentioned thrill-power spectacle. Definitely a sense of &#039;I want to be like that&#039; and it&#039;s hard to imagine anyone else at that point having the same effect (it was a level up from bloody Shakey that&#039;s for sure). Obv Jackson (was already) and would be (i think of Billie Jean as my official intro to he, but MOTWWGT) in a different league but at that young age it would be harder to appreciate just how and why (if anything there may have been a sense of feeling closer to Brit pop acts of the time which helped whereas MJ was more thrillingly foreign - but this is more something that just came thru in the videos). All of which renders much criticism of his &#039;musical competence&#039; largely irrelevant to me at least, but does make him/this Great Pop (Art). Ah subjectivism.

*But srsly &#039;82 was a strange and eventful year for lil me for v bad and wrong reasons including nearly dying in a house fire plus parents divorce. Perhaps subconsciously that all made the memory of AA&#039;s theatrical tomfoolery an aspirational beacon (and one of the earliest of many).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think my reaction to AA at the time, as a 4 year old (that sounds so absurd every time I write it ha ha*), was immediate compulsion and the afore-mentioned thrill-power spectacle. Definitely a sense of &#8216;I want to be like that&#8217; and it&#8217;s hard to imagine anyone else at that point having the same effect (it was a level up from bloody Shakey that&#8217;s for sure). Obv Jackson (was already) and would be (i think of Billie Jean as my official intro to he, but MOTWWGT) in a different league but at that young age it would be harder to appreciate just how and why (if anything there may have been a sense of feeling closer to Brit pop acts of the time which helped whereas MJ was more thrillingly foreign &#8211; but this is more something that just came thru in the videos). All of which renders much criticism of his &#8216;musical competence&#8217; largely irrelevant to me at least, but does make him/this Great Pop (Art). Ah subjectivism.</p>
<p>*But srsly &#8217;82 was a strange and eventful year for lil me for v bad and wrong reasons including nearly dying in a house fire plus parents divorce. Perhaps subconsciously that all made the memory of AA&#8217;s theatrical tomfoolery an aspirational beacon (and one of the earliest of many).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark M</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-608700</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-608700</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s vaguely interesting about Lex&#039;s position* (let it be said again that he is a GREAT BIG ROCKIST) is that it formed a major strain of &#039;80s pop cultural thinking – there were lots of people who indeed felt ridicule was something to be scared of, and ruled that we must all strive to be timeless and believers in craft and quality and listen mostly to Curtis and Marvin with a side order of Coltrane and to dress like Miles** circa 1958... one improbable result of this being Absolute Beginners, the movie, and another being the welcoming on to the pop scene of pompously high-minded teens like Tanita Tikaram.  

*You do know that almost everyone else ever finds Tori Amos inherently ridiculous, don&#039;t you Lex?

**As it happens, I am broadly in favour of most men having a go at dressing like Miles in 1958, but a) can see the cultural dangers of such a restrictive approach and b) it normally goes horribly wrong, as it did in the late &#039;80s, and you had 17 year olds heading out to clubs looking like estate agents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s vaguely interesting about Lex&#8217;s position* (let it be said again that he is a GREAT BIG ROCKIST) is that it formed a major strain of &#8217;80s pop cultural thinking – there were lots of people who indeed felt ridicule was something to be scared of, and ruled that we must all strive to be timeless and believers in craft and quality and listen mostly to Curtis and Marvin with a side order of Coltrane and to dress like Miles** circa 1958&#8230; one improbable result of this being Absolute Beginners, the movie, and another being the welcoming on to the pop scene of pompously high-minded teens like Tanita Tikaram.  </p>
<p>*You do know that almost everyone else ever finds Tori Amos inherently ridiculous, don&#8217;t you Lex?</p>
<p>**As it happens, I am broadly in favour of most men having a go at dressing like Miles in 1958, but a) can see the cultural dangers of such a restrictive approach and b) it normally goes horribly wrong, as it did in the late &#8217;80s, and you had 17 year olds heading out to clubs looking like estate agents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-608697</link>
		<dc:creator>pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-608697</guid>
		<description>plus there&#039;s a whole rave sub-genre isn&#039;t there? granpa-brain has set in so i can&#039;t recall its name (&quot;charlie says...&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>plus there&#8217;s a whole rave sub-genre isn&#8217;t there? granpa-brain has set in so i can&#8217;t recall its name (&#8220;charlie says&#8230;&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-608693</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-608693</guid>
		<description>AQUA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AQUA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2009/01/adam-and-the-ants-stand-and-deliver/#comment-608690</link>
		<dc:creator>pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=13018#comment-608690</guid>
		<description>i am not a fan of the idea of cycles in pop culture, but i wonder if there is a kind of cycle for the return (and subsequent disappearance) of tot-pop as a value? (cf also capt.sensible and his tiswas-stylings?) (and madness, whose entire thing is a melancholic nostalgisation of themselves as kids and the passing of that world) 

what i mean is that, every now and then, a self-identified &quot;generation&quot; reaches a liminal collective age where it&#039;s useful and instructive and fun to annoy their elders and contemporaries by being excited by things that remind them of the things they liked BEFORE they became grumpy horny teenagers

there&#039;s a lot of stuff in mid-60s pop which exhibits tot-value -- then a lull, really, till the early 80s  

in-between there are peaks of the fetishisation of suave adulthood (which are often equally brittle and shortlived) 

er yes, except THERE ARE NO CYCLES IN POP, so er</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am not a fan of the idea of cycles in pop culture, but i wonder if there is a kind of cycle for the return (and subsequent disappearance) of tot-pop as a value? (cf also capt.sensible and his tiswas-stylings?) (and madness, whose entire thing is a melancholic nostalgisation of themselves as kids and the passing of that world) </p>
<p>what i mean is that, every now and then, a self-identified &#8220;generation&#8221; reaches a liminal collective age where it&#8217;s useful and instructive and fun to annoy their elders and contemporaries by being excited by things that remind them of the things they liked BEFORE they became grumpy horny teenagers</p>
<p>there&#8217;s a lot of stuff in mid-60s pop which exhibits tot-value &#8212; then a lull, really, till the early 80s  </p>
<p>in-between there are peaks of the fetishisation of suave adulthood (which are often equally brittle and shortlived) </p>
<p>er yes, except THERE ARE NO CYCLES IN POP, so er</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

