<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: W. Was A Brolin Stone (Production)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/11/w-was-a-brolin-stone-production/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/11/w-was-a-brolin-stone-production/</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:52:45 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/11/w-was-a-brolin-stone-production/#comment-548352</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12942#comment-548352</guid>
		<description>I think Nixon informs W a lot, in as much as Stone is trying to avoid making certain mistakes he felt he made in Nixon. In as much as Tony Hopkins isn&#039;t in W he has successfully lept the biggest hurdle.

Nixon wanted to be an important film and was thus weighed down by its attempts at importance. W is trying to be anything but important and therefore oddly seems to gain something. It is more akin to a rock biopic, than a political one (indeed has the same flashback type structure of Ray or Walk The Line (and thus Walk Hard)).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Nixon informs W a lot, in as much as Stone is trying to avoid making certain mistakes he felt he made in Nixon. In as much as Tony Hopkins isn&#8217;t in W he has successfully lept the biggest hurdle.</p>
<p>Nixon wanted to be an important film and was thus weighed down by its attempts at importance. W is trying to be anything but important and therefore oddly seems to gain something. It is more akin to a rock biopic, than a political one (indeed has the same flashback type structure of Ray or Walk The Line (and thus Walk Hard)).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/11/w-was-a-brolin-stone-production/#comment-548326</link>
		<dc:creator>pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12942#comment-548326</guid>
		<description>it is surprisingly unlike nixon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is surprisingly unlike nixon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DV</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/11/w-was-a-brolin-stone-production/#comment-547989</link>
		<dc:creator>DV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12942#comment-547989</guid>
		<description>Is it in any sense like &quot;Nixon&quot;? I liked that. What you say about W sounds a bit similar - having an actor who is not really impersonating the character as such, and portraying a highly maligned figure somewhat sympathetically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it in any sense like &#8220;Nixon&#8221;? I liked that. What you say about W sounds a bit similar &#8211; having an actor who is not really impersonating the character as such, and portraying a highly maligned figure somewhat sympathetically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
