<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DR HOOK &#8211; &#8220;When You&#8217;re In Love With A Beautiful Woman&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 02:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paytes</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-707916</link>
		<dc:creator>Paytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 00:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-707916</guid>
		<description>Thank you muchly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you muchly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomLane</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-707773</link>
		<dc:creator>TomLane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 23:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-707773</guid>
		<description>The Producer&#039;s name was Ron Haffkine. He was also their co-manager.  He produced some other things as well.  But it appears his biggest work was with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Producer&#8217;s name was Ron Haffkine. He was also their co-manager.  He produced some other things as well.  But it appears his biggest work was with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paytes</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-707651</link>
		<dc:creator>Paytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-707651</guid>
		<description>Anyone know who produced The Hook&#039;s light-as-a-feather disco singles (WYILWABW, Sexy Eyes, Better Love Next Time)? 




 ... BTW, this is my third post (I think) and I think that I may have flouted FT etiquette by not announcing myself as a first timer on my first(My Camera Never Lies). Hello!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know who produced The Hook&#8217;s light-as-a-feather disco singles (WYILWABW, Sexy Eyes, Better Love Next Time)? </p>
<p> &#8230; BTW, this is my third post (I think) and I think that I may have flouted FT etiquette by not announcing myself as a first timer on my first(My Camera Never Lies). Hello!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbie</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-523570</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-523570</guid>
		<description>@11: FT&#039;s Conrad

The 1992 edition of the Guinness Top 40 Charts book does mistakenly list Dr Hook as the number one for November 10, 1979 with Lena Martell dropping to number two. The chart used for that week in the Top 40 Charts book is the erroneous chart that appeared in Music Week, issue dated 10 November 1979, rather than the corrected chart. I believe the 1996 edition of Top 40 Charts also contains the same erroneous chart.

Unlike the 1976 chart mix-up which was corrected within a few hours, the Dr Hook / Lena Martell mix-up took 24 hours to correct which meant Music Week went to print with an incorrect chart. In those days the chart pull out in Music Week was displayed in many record stores. This led to Martell&#039;s record company claiming that the mistake effectively reduced demand both from retailers for re-orders and customers for purchases of for her single and cost her the number one the following week.

Incidentally, the chart error was caused by some of Martell&#039;s sales being added to Dr Hook&#039;s sales and it was the fact that her label thought it suspicious that chart figures showed Dr Hook had outsold Lena Martell by such a large margin (by 150% if I remember correctly the reports at the time) that led to the chart compilers rerunning a sales count of those two records.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@11: FT&#8217;s Conrad</p>
<p>The 1992 edition of the Guinness Top 40 Charts book does mistakenly list Dr Hook as the number one for November 10, 1979 with Lena Martell dropping to number two. The chart used for that week in the Top 40 Charts book is the erroneous chart that appeared in Music Week, issue dated 10 November 1979, rather than the corrected chart. I believe the 1996 edition of Top 40 Charts also contains the same erroneous chart.</p>
<p>Unlike the 1976 chart mix-up which was corrected within a few hours, the Dr Hook / Lena Martell mix-up took 24 hours to correct which meant Music Week went to print with an incorrect chart. In those days the chart pull out in Music Week was displayed in many record stores. This led to Martell&#8217;s record company claiming that the mistake effectively reduced demand both from retailers for re-orders and customers for purchases of for her single and cost her the number one the following week.</p>
<p>Incidentally, the chart error was caused by some of Martell&#8217;s sales being added to Dr Hook&#8217;s sales and it was the fact that her label thought it suspicious that chart figures showed Dr Hook had outsold Lena Martell by such a large margin (by 150% if I remember correctly the reports at the time) that led to the chart compilers rerunning a sales count of those two records.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Punctum</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-520784</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Punctum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-520784</guid>
		<description>From what I recall the real reason for the drop down the charts was Pye&#039;s crap stock control and hence insufficient copies of the single in the shops over the crucial weekend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I recall the real reason for the drop down the charts was Pye&#8217;s crap stock control and hence insufficient copies of the single in the shops over the crucial weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brown</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-520390</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-520390</guid>
		<description>@14: Lena&#039;s record company apparently claimed that the apparent drop down the charts discouraged shops from re-ordering stock of her single, and thus handed an advantage to Dr Hook. How much of this is true I don&#039;t know how to judge.

I still think this is bobbins though. I don&#039;t particularly like his vocal anyway, and everything about this seems to go wrong - boring tune, all the good bits of which are copied from &#039;Rock Your Baby&#039;, awful lyric, smugness and a really flaccid production.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@14: Lena&#8217;s record company apparently claimed that the apparent drop down the charts discouraged shops from re-ordering stock of her single, and thus handed an advantage to Dr Hook. How much of this is true I don&#8217;t know how to judge.</p>
<p>I still think this is bobbins though. I don&#8217;t particularly like his vocal anyway, and everything about this seems to go wrong &#8211; boring tune, all the good bits of which are copied from &#8216;Rock Your Baby&#8217;, awful lyric, smugness and a really flaccid production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erithian</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-520090</link>
		<dc:creator>Erithian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 12:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-520090</guid>
		<description>There was also a Radio 1 spoof (Noel Edmonds might have been behind it) where the question in every line of &quot;If Not You&quot; was answered with a DJ&#039;s jingle, viz: &quot;Who&#039;s gonna iron my shirts?&quot; - &quot;Dave Lee Travis!&quot; - &quot;Who&#039;s gonna kiss where it hurts?&quot; -&quot;David Hamilton!&quot; etc etc.

Magic Fly #20 - no, Ray Sawyer did actually lose an eye in a car crash in 1967.  A friend of mine was helpless with laughter when he saw kids dancing to WYILWABW at a school disco by holding a hand over one eye and shaking imaginary maracas with the free hand.

Another favourite Hook quote I&#039;ve remembered:
Q: &quot;Why did you call your latest album &quot;Bankrupt&quot;?&quot;
A: &quot;Why did they call it &quot;World War Two&quot;?  We didn&#039;t have a dime.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was also a Radio 1 spoof (Noel Edmonds might have been behind it) where the question in every line of &#8220;If Not You&#8221; was answered with a DJ&#8217;s jingle, viz: &#8220;Who&#8217;s gonna iron my shirts?&#8221; &#8211; &#8220;Dave Lee Travis!&#8221; &#8211; &#8220;Who&#8217;s gonna kiss where it hurts?&#8221; -&#8221;David Hamilton!&#8221; etc etc.</p>
<p>Magic Fly #20 &#8211; no, Ray Sawyer did actually lose an eye in a car crash in 1967.  A friend of mine was helpless with laughter when he saw kids dancing to WYILWABW at a school disco by holding a hand over one eye and shaking imaginary maracas with the free hand.</p>
<p>Another favourite Hook quote I&#8217;ve remembered:<br />
Q: &#8220;Why did you call your latest album &#8220;Bankrupt&#8221;?&#8221;<br />
A: &#8220;Why did they call it &#8220;World War Two&#8221;?  We didn&#8217;t have a dime.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark G</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-520048</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-520048</guid>
		<description>Not true:

After the BBC banned it, some CBS bods recorded themselves singing over the track, the line &quot;on the cover of the radio times&quot;, pressed a few promos and sent them to the BBC.

The actual normal single is the same version as the USA version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not true:</p>
<p>After the BBC banned it, some CBS bods recorded themselves singing over the track, the line &#8220;on the cover of the radio times&#8221;, pressed a few promos and sent them to the BBC.</p>
<p>The actual normal single is the same version as the USA version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H.</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-519987</link>
		<dc:creator>H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-519987</guid>
		<description>Fun fact: their early seventies hit &quot;Cover Of The Rolling Stone&quot; was released in the UK as &quot;Cover Of The Radio Times&quot;. True!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fun fact: their early seventies hit &#8220;Cover Of The Rolling Stone&#8221; was released in the UK as &#8220;Cover Of The Radio Times&#8221;. True!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henry s</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-519300</link>
		<dc:creator>henry s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-519300</guid>
		<description>and I&#039;ve just sorted out this year&#039;s Halloween costume!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and I&#8217;ve just sorted out this year&#8217;s Halloween costume!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henry s</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-519299</link>
		<dc:creator>henry s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-519299</guid>
		<description>I never knew that they had a singer other than the eyepatch guy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never knew that they had a singer other than the eyepatch guy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Punctum</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-519284</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Punctum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-519284</guid>
		<description>Not &lt;i&gt;my&lt;/i&gt; mum and dad, pal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not <i>my</i> mum and dad, pal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LondonLee</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-519276</link>
		<dc:creator>LondonLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-519276</guid>
		<description>This and the Lena Martell were proof that our mums and dads still had some influence on the charts. It&#039;s like punk never happened!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This and the Lena Martell were proof that our mums and dads still had some influence on the charts. It&#8217;s like punk never happened!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Punctum</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-519260</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Punctum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-519260</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a giant step between this and the next number one, that&#039;s for sure...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a giant step between this and the next number one, that&#8217;s for sure&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinylscot</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-519244</link>
		<dc:creator>vinylscot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-519244</guid>
		<description>Like DJP (I suspect), I was disappointed at Dr Hook&#039;s evolution from purveyors of good, catchy, quirky, but most of all clever songs, to syrupy MOR pap like this and the two 1976 hits.

Listening to it even now, I can see what the writer is trying to do, but that&#039;s because it&#039;s signposted in thirty-foot-high letters; a little subtlety would not have gone amiss.

Hated it then; hate it now; one of these #1s that make you despair at the record-buying public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like DJP (I suspect), I was disappointed at Dr Hook&#8217;s evolution from purveyors of good, catchy, quirky, but most of all clever songs, to syrupy MOR pap like this and the two 1976 hits.</p>
<p>Listening to it even now, I can see what the writer is trying to do, but that&#8217;s because it&#8217;s signposted in thirty-foot-high letters; a little subtlety would not have gone amiss.</p>
<p>Hated it then; hate it now; one of these #1s that make you despair at the record-buying public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pink champale</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-519237</link>
		<dc:creator>pink champale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-519237</guid>
		<description>yes, djp. i&#039;ve always thought of this as a mellow cousin to all the paranoid soul hits of the lates 60&#039;s early 70&#039;s - &#039;bernadette&#039;, &#039;backstabbers&#039;, &#039;who is he..&#039; etc. still, i thought this might get a bit of a kicking (even here) and am pleased to see pretty much everyone thinks it&#039;s alright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, djp. i&#8217;ve always thought of this as a mellow cousin to all the paranoid soul hits of the lates 60&#8242;s early 70&#8242;s &#8211; &#8216;bernadette&#8217;, &#8216;backstabbers&#8217;, &#8216;who is he..&#8217; etc. still, i thought this might get a bit of a kicking (even here) and am pleased to see pretty much everyone thinks it&#8217;s alright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Punctum</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-519148</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Punctum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 08:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-519148</guid>
		<description>The &quot;Rock Your Baby&quot; beat continues to crop up in unexpected places. They&#039;d lost the Medicine Show, Silverstein and therefore pretty well all of the humour, settling for anxious-sounding MoR pop. Indeed it’s noticeable that throughout such hits as &quot;A Little Bit More&quot; and &quot;If Not You&quot; Locorriere invariably sounds on the verge of a nervous collapse, or exploding, his tremulous counter-tenor of a voice never at ease.

99% of radio DJs gained cheap laughter from THAT opening line. And although it sees them belatedly attempt disco, the song is an exercise in sustained paranoia; she’s so beautiful that Locorriere can only feel insecure, as evinced by the dreadful emphasis that he puts on the word &quot;’phone&quot; in the couplet &quot;You want to trust her/Then somebody hangs up when you answer the ‘phone&quot; or the shivering triple moan he gives the word &quot;lovers&quot; in the phrase &quot;faint-hearted lovers.&quot; Thus it becomes a list song of all the arguments against falling in love – &quot;You watch her eyes,&quot; &quot;You watch her friends,&quot; &quot;You look for lies,&quot; and, finally and inevitably, &quot;You go it alone,&quot; because frankly, by the time the song ends, Locorriere sounds like (a) David Byrne and (b) a potential suicide bomber. Note the lack of citing of the Beautiful Woman’s feelings for him, if any. Musically, though, it drifts by as blandly and unquestionably as all of Dr Hook’s later works, and consequently my raising much enthusiasm for it is, as they say, hard.  NEXT!

(still, props to the actual &quot;Dr Hook&quot; inventing Bez in the video)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Rock Your Baby&#8221; beat continues to crop up in unexpected places. They&#8217;d lost the Medicine Show, Silverstein and therefore pretty well all of the humour, settling for anxious-sounding MoR pop. Indeed it’s noticeable that throughout such hits as &#8220;A Little Bit More&#8221; and &#8220;If Not You&#8221; Locorriere invariably sounds on the verge of a nervous collapse, or exploding, his tremulous counter-tenor of a voice never at ease.</p>
<p>99% of radio DJs gained cheap laughter from THAT opening line. And although it sees them belatedly attempt disco, the song is an exercise in sustained paranoia; she’s so beautiful that Locorriere can only feel insecure, as evinced by the dreadful emphasis that he puts on the word &#8220;’phone&#8221; in the couplet &#8220;You want to trust her/Then somebody hangs up when you answer the ‘phone&#8221; or the shivering triple moan he gives the word &#8220;lovers&#8221; in the phrase &#8220;faint-hearted lovers.&#8221; Thus it becomes a list song of all the arguments against falling in love – &#8220;You watch her eyes,&#8221; &#8220;You watch her friends,&#8221; &#8220;You look for lies,&#8221; and, finally and inevitably, &#8220;You go it alone,&#8221; because frankly, by the time the song ends, Locorriere sounds like (a) David Byrne and (b) a potential suicide bomber. Note the lack of citing of the Beautiful Woman’s feelings for him, if any. Musically, though, it drifts by as blandly and unquestionably as all of Dr Hook’s later works, and consequently my raising much enthusiasm for it is, as they say, hard.  NEXT!</p>
<p>(still, props to the actual &#8220;Dr Hook&#8221; inventing Bez in the video)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magic Fly</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-519141</link>
		<dc:creator>Magic Fly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 08:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-519141</guid>
		<description>I have a lingering memory of the chap in the hat flipping his eyepatch to reveal a fully functioning eye. Can that be true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a lingering memory of the chap in the hat flipping his eyepatch to reveal a fully functioning eye. Can that be true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Intl</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-519026</link>
		<dc:creator>The Intl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-519026</guid>
		<description>#12 - yeah.

Interesting that their early days had them tied in with Shel Silverstein.

Later, lead singer was showing up at state fairs as &quot;lead singer from...&quot;

And that&#039;s about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#12 &#8211; yeah.</p>
<p>Interesting that their early days had them tied in with Shel Silverstein.</p>
<p>Later, lead singer was showing up at state fairs as &#8220;lead singer from&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matos W.K.</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-518969</link>
		<dc:creator>Matos W.K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-518969</guid>
		<description>Ah, but Tom, the smoothies behind &lt;I&gt;everything&lt;/I&gt; in the late &#039;70s were vaguely gnarly bar band outfits! Steely Dan and its fallout were all absolutely longhairs and the like. It isn&#039;t until early &#039;80s Britain (I think) that shaved-and-groomed became any kind of norm again for the smooth-sound set. (See &lt;I&gt;Yacht Rock&lt;/I&gt; for further evidence.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, but Tom, the smoothies behind <i>everything</i> in the late &#8217;70s were vaguely gnarly bar band outfits! Steely Dan and its fallout were all absolutely longhairs and the like. It isn&#8217;t until early &#8217;80s Britain (I think) that shaved-and-groomed became any kind of norm again for the smooth-sound set. (See <i>Yacht Rock</i> for further evidence.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-518846</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-518846</guid>
		<description>Great post, Erithian.  I also have a parentally derived soft spot for Dr. Hook: my late father and late step-mother both liked the band a great deal, and those two big 1976 hits (&quot;If Not You&quot; and &quot;A Little Bit More&quot;) remind me of the all too brief early, happy, honeymoon phase of their catastrophically ill-matched and destructive relationship.  &quot;If Not You&quot; in particular was &quot;their song&quot;; my stepmother bought the 7&quot;, and they often jokily quoted it at each other.  (&quot;Who&#039;s going to iron all my shirts, and who&#039;s going to kiss where it hurts?&quot;)

As for &quot;When You&#039;re In Love...&quot; - yes, I can well see how it could be legitimately interpreted as an example of dodgy gender politics, but I read it more as a breezy, light-hearted, shoulder-shrugging, somewhat self-deprecating skit on the perils of dating a few notches above one&#039;s rightful station in the Hotness stakes.  And as someone who was still carrying a massive torch for the athletic blonde hotty who popped my cherry in June (see the &quot;Are &#039;Friends&#039; Electric&quot; post), with occasional long-distance re-matches still to be had, I related to this Big Time.

I played this again this afternoon, and found myself charmed all over again by its &quot;Rock Your Baby&quot; derived soft shoe shuffle, by its ridiculous innuendo - and especially by those fractionally overdone backing vocals, whose call-and-responses constantly teeter on the brink of absurdity, raising a smile every time.

A warm, fluffy, affectionate and unashamedly sentimental 7 from me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Erithian.  I also have a parentally derived soft spot for Dr. Hook: my late father and late step-mother both liked the band a great deal, and those two big 1976 hits (&#8220;If Not You&#8221; and &#8220;A Little Bit More&#8221;) remind me of the all too brief early, happy, honeymoon phase of their catastrophically ill-matched and destructive relationship.  &#8220;If Not You&#8221; in particular was &#8220;their song&#8221;; my stepmother bought the 7&#8243;, and they often jokily quoted it at each other.  (&#8220;Who&#8217;s going to iron all my shirts, and who&#8217;s going to kiss where it hurts?&#8221;)</p>
<p>As for &#8220;When You&#8217;re In Love&#8230;&#8221; &#8211; yes, I can well see how it could be legitimately interpreted as an example of dodgy gender politics, but I read it more as a breezy, light-hearted, shoulder-shrugging, somewhat self-deprecating skit on the perils of dating a few notches above one&#8217;s rightful station in the Hotness stakes.  And as someone who was still carrying a massive torch for the athletic blonde hotty who popped my cherry in June (see the &#8220;Are &#8216;Friends&#8217; Electric&#8221; post), with occasional long-distance re-matches still to be had, I related to this Big Time.</p>
<p>I played this again this afternoon, and found myself charmed all over again by its &#8220;Rock Your Baby&#8221; derived soft shoe shuffle, by its ridiculous innuendo &#8211; and especially by those fractionally overdone backing vocals, whose call-and-responses constantly teeter on the brink of absurdity, raising a smile every time.</p>
<p>A warm, fluffy, affectionate and unashamedly sentimental 7 from me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wwolfe</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-518830</link>
		<dc:creator>wwolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-518830</guid>
		<description>I love &quot;Carry Me, Carrie,&quot; back when they still had the Medicine Show attached to the good Doctor.  Another Shel Silverstein gem, it&#039;s undoubtedly the best adaptation of a Theodore Dreiser novel pop music&#039;s ever known.  (Seriously, though, it&#039;s a top notch record: a perfect balance of humor and pathos, with a genuine rush of exhileration at the climax.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love &#8220;Carry Me, Carrie,&#8221; back when they still had the Medicine Show attached to the good Doctor.  Another Shel Silverstein gem, it&#8217;s undoubtedly the best adaptation of a Theodore Dreiser novel pop music&#8217;s ever known.  (Seriously, though, it&#8217;s a top notch record: a perfect balance of humor and pathos, with a genuine rush of exhileration at the climax.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldo</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-518742</link>
		<dc:creator>Waldo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-518742</guid>
		<description>...that&#039;s the Russian geezer not the Boney M record, which didn&#039;t get to number one at all, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;that&#8217;s the Russian geezer not the Boney M record, which didn&#8217;t get to number one at all, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldo</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-518705</link>
		<dc:creator>Waldo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-518705</guid>
		<description># 11 - Yes, Conrad. Basically, I remember it as Geoff Love/Four Seasons revisited. Dr Hook was announced as the new number one only for the decision to be reversed subsequently under the guise of computer error. My own take on it was that with &quot;Sweet Jesus&quot; returned to the top, the British people were mobilised into emergency action. Out they all went to buy WYILWABW, the record flying off the shelves and we were finally rid of Lena to a chorus of secular hosannas nationwide. The wretched woman was more dificult to dispose of than Rasputin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 11 &#8211; Yes, Conrad. Basically, I remember it as Geoff Love/Four Seasons revisited. Dr Hook was announced as the new number one only for the decision to be reversed subsequently under the guise of computer error. My own take on it was that with &#8220;Sweet Jesus&#8221; returned to the top, the British people were mobilised into emergency action. Out they all went to buy WYILWABW, the record flying off the shelves and we were finally rid of Lena to a chorus of secular hosannas nationwide. The wretched woman was more dificult to dispose of than Rasputin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LondonLee</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/10/dr-hook-when-youre-in-love-with-a-beautiful-woman/#comment-518701</link>
		<dc:creator>LondonLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12266#comment-518701</guid>
		<description>I love &lt;I&gt;Sylvia&#039;s Mother&lt;/I&gt; (partly because my mum loved it) and I prefer to think of it straight and not as some piss-take by a bunch of grizzled old hippies having a laugh at teenage pop songs. But this one never did anything for me, it&#039;s like a horrible mash-up of slick LA session muso rock and disco, neither of which comes out of it well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love <i>Sylvia&#8217;s Mother</i> (partly because my mum loved it) and I prefer to think of it straight and not as some piss-take by a bunch of grizzled old hippies having a laugh at teenage pop songs. But this one never did anything for me, it&#8217;s like a horrible mash-up of slick LA session muso rock and disco, neither of which comes out of it well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

