<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JJ BARRIE &#8211; &#8220;No Charge&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:38:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wichita lineman</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-891686</link>
		<dc:creator>wichita lineman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 08:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-891686</guid>
		<description>Ha! I&#039;d like to think so. But sadly it&#039;s mojo selling the mag with their usual exclamation mark-ridden front page. The piece has little to do with &quot;why&quot;. No mention of JJ Barrie. Or Third World War for that matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! I&#8217;d like to think so. But sadly it&#8217;s mojo selling the mag with their usual exclamation mark-ridden front page. The piece has little to do with &#8220;why&#8221;. No mention of JJ Barrie. Or Third World War for that matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cumbrian</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-890292</link>
		<dc:creator>Cumbrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-890292</guid>
		<description>Mojo this month has an article advertised on the front cover about &quot;Why Punk Had To Happen&quot; written by Jon Savage. Not read it yet - bought it for a flight later on this month (it came complete with Suze Rotolo&#039;s book on Bob Dylan, which I imagine will help kill the time too). I wonder whether he&#039;s bothered reading this epic thread to get some ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mojo this month has an article advertised on the front cover about &#8220;Why Punk Had To Happen&#8221; written by Jon Savage. Not read it yet &#8211; bought it for a flight later on this month (it came complete with Suze Rotolo&#8217;s book on Bob Dylan, which I imagine will help kill the time too). I wonder whether he&#8217;s bothered reading this epic thread to get some ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wichita lineman</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-862190</link>
		<dc:creator>wichita lineman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-862190</guid>
		<description>Bye bye JJ... never to be seen again after this week&#039;s TOTP.

Our Kid... memory playing tricks. Wafer thin production.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bye bye JJ&#8230; never to be seen again after this week&#8217;s TOTP.</p>
<p>Our Kid&#8230; memory playing tricks. Wafer thin production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark G</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-861148</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-861148</guid>
		<description>1. Yup, watch on the iplayer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Yup, watch on the iplayer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wichita lineman</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-861111</link>
		<dc:creator>wichita lineman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-861111</guid>
		<description>1. Tonight&#039;s TOTP??

2. Better than Our Kid??? I haven&#039;t heard their sole hit in years but in my mind it sounds like a Spector-lite pre-pubescent smash.

3. No Charge better than most Westlife no.1s???? Err, yes, of course you&#039;re right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Tonight&#8217;s TOTP??</p>
<p>2. Better than Our Kid??? I haven&#8217;t heard their sole hit in years but in my mind it sounds like a Spector-lite pre-pubescent smash.</p>
<p>3. No Charge better than most Westlife no.1s???? Err, yes, of course you&#8217;re right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Hicks</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-861079</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Hicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-861079</guid>
		<description>Can I be a bit controversial and say I actually quite like this song? Maybe it&#039;s bad for 1976 standards, but given some of the crap that&#039;s been at number 1 in the 35 years since, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s as bad as people claim. Maybe because JJ Barrie seems like a genuinely nice person (having never heard of him before the recent TOTP repeats), a friendly uncle type, yeah it&#039;s overly sentimental but it&#039;s written at least with some heart. There are records much, much worse than this to have graced the top spot, I&#039;ll listen to this over some dire manufactured boyband ballad/X Factor winner any day. It wasn&#039;t even the worst record on tonight&#039;s TOTP, that honour went to Our Kid.

Wikipedia page reveals that Mr Barrie is still alive and well, and approaching his 78th birthday in a few weeks. He&#039;s also an ex-comedian, so I wonder if he&#039;d have appreciated the Billy Connolly parody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I be a bit controversial and say I actually quite like this song? Maybe it&#8217;s bad for 1976 standards, but given some of the crap that&#8217;s been at number 1 in the 35 years since, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s as bad as people claim. Maybe because JJ Barrie seems like a genuinely nice person (having never heard of him before the recent TOTP repeats), a friendly uncle type, yeah it&#8217;s overly sentimental but it&#8217;s written at least with some heart. There are records much, much worse than this to have graced the top spot, I&#8217;ll listen to this over some dire manufactured boyband ballad/X Factor winner any day. It wasn&#8217;t even the worst record on tonight&#8217;s TOTP, that honour went to Our Kid.</p>
<p>Wikipedia page reveals that Mr Barrie is still alive and well, and approaching his 78th birthday in a few weeks. He&#8217;s also an ex-comedian, so I wonder if he&#8217;d have appreciated the Billy Connolly parody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enitharmon</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-833034</link>
		<dc:creator>enitharmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-833034</guid>
		<description>@363

Bravo, my little caramel wafer!  I was a bit of an Ethics Girl myself at one time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@363</p>
<p>Bravo, my little caramel wafer!  I was a bit of an Ethics Girl myself at one time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flahr</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-833016</link>
		<dc:creator>flahr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-833016</guid>
		<description>So you will quoth nevermore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you will quoth nevermore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: punctum</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832980</link>
		<dc:creator>punctum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832980</guid>
		<description>I done moral philosophy innit.

I gave up quothing in 2003 on doctor&#039;s orders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I done moral philosophy innit.</p>
<p>I gave up quothing in 2003 on doctor&#8217;s orders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enitharmon</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832953</link>
		<dc:creator>enitharmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832953</guid>
		<description>Quoth marcello @ 360:

“Grumpy Old Men” bang on about how great things used to be, whereas I’m more concerned about how things are going to be. Hence vinyl fetishists etc. have more in common with GOM than I do&quot;.

Erm, Mr Child-Prodigy-Who-Went-To-Oxford, did they not teach you Logic amongst those dreaming spires?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quoth marcello @ 360:</p>
<p>“Grumpy Old Men” bang on about how great things used to be, whereas I’m more concerned about how things are going to be. Hence vinyl fetishists etc. have more in common with GOM than I do&#8221;.</p>
<p>Erm, Mr Child-Prodigy-Who-Went-To-Oxford, did they not teach you Logic amongst those dreaming spires?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a tanned rested and unlogged lørd sükråt wötsît</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832946</link>
		<dc:creator>a tanned rested and unlogged lørd sükråt wötsît</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832946</guid>
		<description>You were chuckling about that when I saw you last, Marcello -- I wish I had seen it, the New Thing&#039;s belated Bill Grundy moment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You were chuckling about that when I saw you last, Marcello &#8212; I wish I had seen it, the New Thing&#8217;s belated Bill Grundy moment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: punctum</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832927</link>
		<dc:creator>punctum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832927</guid>
		<description>Too bad Mark S missed the recent episode of Jools where Mr Boogie Woogie Piano Magic was utterly pwned by McCoy Tyner, who would not stop his piece; he was reduced to grimacing camera pseudo-grins and having to yell “MCCOY! TYNER! JAZZ! LEGEND! GETOFF!” so that Elbow could close the show with their community singalong. Nothing against Elbow, whose current album I greatly prefer to their extremely overrated previous one, but it was terrific television.

“Grumpy Old Men” bang on about how great things used to be, whereas I’m more concerned about how things are going to be. Hence vinyl fetishists etc. have more in common with GOM than I do.

A friend of mine was once shocked to see me ranting away on an episode of GOM before he realised it was Ken Stott.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad Mark S missed the recent episode of Jools where Mr Boogie Woogie Piano Magic was utterly pwned by McCoy Tyner, who would not stop his piece; he was reduced to grimacing camera pseudo-grins and having to yell “MCCOY! TYNER! JAZZ! LEGEND! GETOFF!” so that Elbow could close the show with their community singalong. Nothing against Elbow, whose current album I greatly prefer to their extremely overrated previous one, but it was terrific television.</p>
<p>“Grumpy Old Men” bang on about how great things used to be, whereas I’m more concerned about how things are going to be. Hence vinyl fetishists etc. have more in common with GOM than I do.</p>
<p>A friend of mine was once shocked to see me ranting away on an episode of GOM before he realised it was Ken Stott.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark G</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832512</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832512</guid>
		<description>It was like when all those jazz dudes couldn&#039;t play to their people as they were &#039;colbarred&#039; from entering theatres, so they would make those short films of their performances for showing in the cinemas in the black parts of town.

Which is why we have all those great films of Cab Calloway, Louis jordan, etc, and not of all those &#039;white-only&#039; acts that always played to their people in the nice theatres....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was like when all those jazz dudes couldn&#8217;t play to their people as they were &#8216;colbarred&#8217; from entering theatres, so they would make those short films of their performances for showing in the cinemas in the black parts of town.</p>
<p>Which is why we have all those great films of Cab Calloway, Louis jordan, etc, and not of all those &#8216;white-only&#8217; acts that always played to their people in the nice theatres&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sükråt tanned rested unlogged and awesome</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832491</link>
		<dc:creator>sükråt tanned rested unlogged and awesome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832491</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m only grumpy when people diss cnut!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m only grumpy when people diss cnut!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thefatgit</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832489</link>
		<dc:creator>thefatgit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832489</guid>
		<description>Is this thread slowly morphing into a repository for everything that is supposedly &quot;bad&quot;, like we&#039;re all a bunch of, dare I say it...Grumpy Old Men???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this thread slowly morphing into a repository for everything that is supposedly &#8220;bad&#8221;, like we&#8217;re all a bunch of, dare I say it&#8230;Grumpy Old Men???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weej</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832485</link>
		<dc:creator>weej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832485</guid>
		<description>Ha, my Dad&#039;s favourite artiste was always Ry Cooder when I was young, though I think it&#039;s probably been Steve Earle these last ten years. I don&#039;t think he&#039;d be interested in Uncut, Girls Aloud or watching Jools though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, my Dad&#8217;s favourite artiste was always Ry Cooder when I was young, though I think it&#8217;s probably been Steve Earle these last ten years. I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;d be interested in Uncut, Girls Aloud or watching Jools though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sükråt tanned rested unlogged and awesome</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832483</link>
		<dc:creator>sükråt tanned rested unlogged and awesome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832483</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not even actually being insulting, really: BtyD isn&#039;t my favourite Ry Cooder LP (and I hardly ever read Uncut and never watch Jools), but I think RC&#039;s a good thing, on the whole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not even actually being insulting, really: BtyD isn&#8217;t my favourite Ry Cooder LP (and I hardly ever read Uncut and never watch Jools), but I think RC&#8217;s a good thing, on the whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sükråt tanned rested unlogged and awesome</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832480</link>
		<dc:creator>sükråt tanned rested unlogged and awesome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832480</guid>
		<description>Haha fair enough, flahr, bad old habits die hard. Exceot I don&#039;t know what to handwavingly call it if I don&#039;t use its (misleading) name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha fair enough, flahr, bad old habits die hard. Exceot I don&#8217;t know what to handwavingly call it if I don&#8217;t use its (misleading) name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832479</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832479</guid>
		<description>I am a Dad, and I listen to a lot of Dadmusic, so I view the term Dadmusic as inherently value neutral, while knowing precisely what sukrat means.

(My personal insult of choice is &quot;Joolsbait&quot; though)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Dad, and I listen to a lot of Dadmusic, so I view the term Dadmusic as inherently value neutral, while knowing precisely what sukrat means.</p>
<p>(My personal insult of choice is &#8220;Joolsbait&#8221; though)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flahr</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832477</link>
		<dc:creator>flahr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832477</guid>
		<description>I dunno why people keep calling it dadmusic. FT is surely one of the most daddest places on the internet and everyone loves Girls Aloud. (As does my dad.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno why people keep calling it dadmusic. FT is surely one of the most daddest places on the internet and everyone loves Girls Aloud. (As does my dad.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sükråt tanned rested unlogged and awesome</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832475</link>
		<dc:creator>sükråt tanned rested unlogged and awesome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832475</guid>
		<description>First &quot;pop&quot; CD is Ry Cooder&#039;s 1979 &lt;i&gt;Bop Till You Drop&lt;/i&gt;: which sorta kinda conjures Uncut-style dadmusic into being a decade in advance... so is it a lovingly crafted pastiche reissue or music expressly &lt;i&gt;refashioned&lt;/i&gt; to suit its gleaming new mode of reproduction?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First &#8220;pop&#8221; CD is Ry Cooder&#8217;s 1979 <i>Bop Till You Drop</i>: which sorta kinda conjures Uncut-style dadmusic into being a decade in advance&#8230; so is it a lovingly crafted pastiche reissue or music expressly <i>refashioned</i> to suit its gleaming new mode of reproduction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sükråt tanned rested unlogged and awesome</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832473</link>
		<dc:creator>sükråt tanned rested unlogged and awesome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832473</guid>
		<description>Very roughly speaking -- certainly until the 90s -- the two-format tension would unpacked as hifi/classy vs lofi/street: with jazz, for example, migrating from street in the 20s and 30s to classy in the 80s, and &quot;quality&quot; in jazz similarly mutating, from &quot;cellarful of noise&quot; joy, back when it was it be found on the lo-fi format, to stately historical self-awareness in the 80s, when it primarily being made for high-end reproduction. Making a racket was the smartest way to exploit the lo-fi formats; noisy music sounded relatively better. 

But it&#039;s actually a good deal more complex than this, even in the 30s or the 50s or the 70s, and I&#039;m not actually sure that music in the age of the free download entirely conforms to the same protocols.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very roughly speaking &#8212; certainly until the 90s &#8212; the two-format tension would unpacked as hifi/classy vs lofi/street: with jazz, for example, migrating from street in the 20s and 30s to classy in the 80s, and &#8220;quality&#8221; in jazz similarly mutating, from &#8220;cellarful of noise&#8221; joy, back when it was it be found on the lo-fi format, to stately historical self-awareness in the 80s, when it primarily being made for high-end reproduction. Making a racket was the smartest way to exploit the lo-fi formats; noisy music sounded relatively better. </p>
<p>But it&#8217;s actually a good deal more complex than this, even in the 30s or the 50s or the 70s, and I&#8217;m not actually sure that music in the age of the free download entirely conforms to the same protocols.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lonepilgrim</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832457</link>
		<dc:creator>lonepilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832457</guid>
		<description>another significant change to our consumption of music has been the swing between speakers and headphones. Families would congregrate around the one &#039;wireless&#039; before the cheap transistor radio allowed more personal and portable consumption. 
I first associate headphones with (appropriately) the &#039;head&#039; music of the 70s and bands like Pink Floyd exploited the possibilities of panning and sound effects. 
The ghettoblasters of the late 70s/early 80s supported a more public consumption before the Walkman swung things back. 
Early CD players were part of expensive hi-fi with speakers to emphasise the quality of the recording until the discman repeated the role of the walkman. Mp3 players have extended this experience - to the extent that most of my consumption of music is via headphones - unless I&#039;m driving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another significant change to our consumption of music has been the swing between speakers and headphones. Families would congregrate around the one &#8216;wireless&#8217; before the cheap transistor radio allowed more personal and portable consumption.<br />
I first associate headphones with (appropriately) the &#8216;head&#8217; music of the 70s and bands like Pink Floyd exploited the possibilities of panning and sound effects.<br />
The ghettoblasters of the late 70s/early 80s supported a more public consumption before the Walkman swung things back.<br />
Early CD players were part of expensive hi-fi with speakers to emphasise the quality of the recording until the discman repeated the role of the walkman. Mp3 players have extended this experience &#8211; to the extent that most of my consumption of music is via headphones &#8211; unless I&#8217;m driving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erithian</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832451</link>
		<dc:creator>Erithian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832451</guid>
		<description>You probably know of the widespread supposition that the maximum length of a CD was set at 74 minutes specifically to accommodate Beethoven’s 9th symphony, and that Herbert von Karajan, conductor of the Berlin Philharmonic, was a major factor in determining that this should be so.  (So what was Oasis&#039;s excuse for Be Here Now, one wonders?!)  Here’s what the myth-debunking site Snopes says about it: http://www.snopes.com/music/media/cdlength.asp 

Did you find that on K-Tel compilation LPs in particular the volume was markedly lower, so as to cope with groove cramming?

Incidentally, I love how after 340 posts we get from JJ Barrie to a silly Cnut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You probably know of the widespread supposition that the maximum length of a CD was set at 74 minutes specifically to accommodate Beethoven’s 9th symphony, and that Herbert von Karajan, conductor of the Berlin Philharmonic, was a major factor in determining that this should be so.  (So what was Oasis&#8217;s excuse for Be Here Now, one wonders?!)  Here’s what the myth-debunking site Snopes says about it: <a href="http://www.snopes.com/music/media/cdlength.asp" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.snopes.com/music/media/cdlength.asp?referer=');">http://www.snopes.com/music/media/cdlength.asp</a> </p>
<p>Did you find that on K-Tel compilation LPs in particular the volume was markedly lower, so as to cope with groove cramming?</p>
<p>Incidentally, I love how after 340 posts we get from JJ Barrie to a silly Cnut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sükråt tanned rested unlogged and awesome</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832413</link>
		<dc:creator>sükråt tanned rested unlogged and awesome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/05/jj-barrie-no-charge/#comment-832413</guid>
		<description>It did increase, yes -- LPs were roughly two sides of 15-22 mins, plausible max. total c.45 mins (longer LPs were said to suffer from &quot;groove cramming&quot;: they delivered less volume and sometimes the gap between grooves was so slight that the indents on a neighbouring groove affected the groove the needle was currently in, so you faintly heard a kind of time-lapse bleed-thorough); CDs after a while started to come in at 1 hr minimum (the ones that weren&#039;t simply new-format reissues, I mean)

There&#039;s a more complex question about human attention span, though*: a song that&#039;s one second long is a novelty, and a song that&#039;s (say) five hours long is a rarity -- it tends to be thought of as a &quot;work&quot;, and will have breaks built in (like the chapters and volumes in very long 19th century books). If anything the thing that&#039;s seems to have become &quot;sticky&quot; is the notion of the &quot;album&quot; as a quasi-unified collection of short semi-autonomous pieces; this isn&#039;t strictly speaking an invention of rock culture, but the modes of its elaboration and its bedding in to the unconscious levels of our reception both are. To the extent that non-rock musics are battling to free themselves from its grip -- dance music probably is, rap certainly isn&#039;t -- they are fighting against something they need to be understood; the militant energy of resistance would evaporate the moment the earlier form was actually culturally forgotten. 

*Stockhausen had a theory about what he called &quot;octaves&quot; of time -- different clusters of timespan that demanded different mode of attention (the timespan of the note is roughly 0.05-1 second, for example; and there&#039;s the timespan of the melodic phrase, the timespan of the song, the timespan of the movement, the timespan of the work, the timespan of the ritual, and so on up... ) (He articulated it semi-scientifically, and it actually falls apart as science I think -- but as sociology or ethnology it&#039;s interesting to see what the similiarities of attention-span are between different cultures)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It did increase, yes &#8212; LPs were roughly two sides of 15-22 mins, plausible max. total c.45 mins (longer LPs were said to suffer from &#8220;groove cramming&#8221;: they delivered less volume and sometimes the gap between grooves was so slight that the indents on a neighbouring groove affected the groove the needle was currently in, so you faintly heard a kind of time-lapse bleed-thorough); CDs after a while started to come in at 1 hr minimum (the ones that weren&#8217;t simply new-format reissues, I mean)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a more complex question about human attention span, though*: a song that&#8217;s one second long is a novelty, and a song that&#8217;s (say) five hours long is a rarity &#8212; it tends to be thought of as a &#8220;work&#8221;, and will have breaks built in (like the chapters and volumes in very long 19th century books). If anything the thing that&#8217;s seems to have become &#8220;sticky&#8221; is the notion of the &#8220;album&#8221; as a quasi-unified collection of short semi-autonomous pieces; this isn&#8217;t strictly speaking an invention of rock culture, but the modes of its elaboration and its bedding in to the unconscious levels of our reception both are. To the extent that non-rock musics are battling to free themselves from its grip &#8212; dance music probably is, rap certainly isn&#8217;t &#8212; they are fighting against something they need to be understood; the militant energy of resistance would evaporate the moment the earlier form was actually culturally forgotten. </p>
<p>*Stockhausen had a theory about what he called &#8220;octaves&#8221; of time &#8212; different clusters of timespan that demanded different mode of attention (the timespan of the note is roughly 0.05-1 second, for example; and there&#8217;s the timespan of the melodic phrase, the timespan of the song, the timespan of the movement, the timespan of the work, the timespan of the ritual, and so on up&#8230; ) (He articulated it semi-scientifically, and it actually falls apart as science I think &#8212; but as sociology or ethnology it&#8217;s interesting to see what the similiarities of attention-span are between different cultures)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

