<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BAY CITY ROLLERS - &#8220;Give A Little Love&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: wichita lineman</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-420697</link>
		<dc:creator>wichita lineman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 11:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-420697</guid>
		<description>Going waaay back to 39, I guessed “Phony Beatlemania has bitten the dust” was about the stage show Beatlemania which came to London in '79 (I think, I remember a feature on Nationwide) and, umm, bit the dust quite quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Going waaay back to 39, I guessed “Phony Beatlemania has bitten the dust” was about the stage show Beatlemania which came to London in &#8216;79 (I think, I remember a feature on Nationwide) and, umm, bit the dust quite quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcello Carlin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-404607</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcello Carlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-404607</guid>
		<description>I'd be surprised if the writers (John Goodison and Phil Wainman, for what it's worth) put more than about half a second of thought into that "dream"/"seventeen" rhyme.

They switched to the covers because (a) they'd decided to part company with Martin and Coulter who wrote all their '74 hits (and "Saturday Night") and (b) Tam told them to, even though, as their albums demonstrate, they actually wanted to rock or at least power pop and write their own stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be surprised if the writers (John Goodison and Phil Wainman, for what it&#8217;s worth) put more than about half a second of thought into that &#8220;dream&#8221;/&#8221;seventeen&#8221; rhyme.</p>
<p>They switched to the covers because (a) they&#8217;d decided to part company with Martin and Coulter who wrote all their &#8216;74 hits (and &#8220;Saturday Night&#8221;) and (b) Tam told them to, even though, as their albums demonstrate, they actually wanted to rock or at least power pop and write their own stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-404604</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-404604</guid>
		<description>We do a teenage survey at work (I think a previous Popular entry mentioned this), and teenagers' ideal future age is one of the questions we ask: it's consistently two-three years ahead until 19 is reached and then it stabilises and drops.

I like the "you're only as good as your last track" theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We do a teenage survey at work (I think a previous Popular entry mentioned this), and teenagers&#8217; ideal future age is one of the questions we ask: it&#8217;s consistently two-three years ahead until 19 is reached and then it stabilises and drops.</p>
<p>I like the &#8220;you&#8217;re only as good as your last track&#8221; theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark G</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-404601</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-404601</guid>
		<description>OK, controversial view ahoy! (and not one I held at the time...)

It's an OK song, recorded really badly/cheaply/poorly.

"It's a teenage dream to be seventeen"

A bad rhyme? Actually, it's a point. Old enough to have options and freedoms, young enough to not fear the end of yr teenage dreams, old enough for sex, and to get away with dringing in pubs, etc. Pre-teens dream of being thirteen but then find it's no different to 12. 

The rest of the song is reflective, and in better hands (and some bad line pruning) could have been a "Father and Son" type 'anthem for the masses'. But the lame realisation by those who thought they didn't have to try too hard killed it. Oh, it got to number one, but I find that often, the quality (or lack of) in a particular track manifests itself in the success (or lack of) in the next single. (eg Culture Club's "The War Song" was badness, "The Medal Song" was fine but failed for possibly the same reason)

"Money Honey" was not a great song, but was a great recording/realisation. But by then it was downhill for the band who had lots of fans buying but slowly drifting off, and no-one 'impartial' doing the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, controversial view ahoy! (and not one I held at the time&#8230;)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an OK song, recorded really badly/cheaply/poorly.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s a teenage dream to be seventeen&#8221;</p>
<p>A bad rhyme? Actually, it&#8217;s a point. Old enough to have options and freedoms, young enough to not fear the end of yr teenage dreams, old enough for sex, and to get away with dringing in pubs, etc. Pre-teens dream of being thirteen but then find it&#8217;s no different to 12. </p>
<p>The rest of the song is reflective, and in better hands (and some bad line pruning) could have been a &#8220;Father and Son&#8221; type &#8216;anthem for the masses&#8217;. But the lame realisation by those who thought they didn&#8217;t have to try too hard killed it. Oh, it got to number one, but I find that often, the quality (or lack of) in a particular track manifests itself in the success (or lack of) in the next single. (eg Culture Club&#8217;s &#8220;The War Song&#8221; was badness, &#8220;The Medal Song&#8221; was fine but failed for possibly the same reason)</p>
<p>&#8220;Money Honey&#8221; was not a great song, but was a great recording/realisation. But by then it was downhill for the band who had lots of fans buying but slowly drifting off, and no-one &#8216;impartial&#8217; doing the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snif</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-404452</link>
		<dc:creator>Snif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-404452</guid>
		<description>One abiding amusement concerning the Rollers is that whenever they toured Australia, they were inevitably accommodated here...

http://www.travelmate.com.au/Images/Things/BigThings/scotsman.jpg

...when playing in Adelaide.

(also a friend recalls crawling around the car park of said establishment at 2am helping a band member find his misplaced supply of illicit substances)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One abiding amusement concerning the Rollers is that whenever they toured Australia, they were inevitably accommodated here&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.travelmate.com.au/Images/Things/BigThings/scotsman.jpg" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.travelmate.com.au/Images/Things/BigThings/scotsman.jpg?referer=');">http://www.travelmate.com.au/Images/Things/BigThings/scotsman.jpg</a></p>
<p>&#8230;when playing in Adelaide.</p>
<p>(also a friend recalls crawling around the car park of said establishment at 2am helping a band member find his misplaced supply of illicit substances)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lena</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-404252</link>
		<dc:creator>Lena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-404252</guid>
		<description>So do I Dan, so do I...

...eventually a song will come up that us North Americans will know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So do I Dan, so do I&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;eventually a song will come up that us North Americans will know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinylscot</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-404153</link>
		<dc:creator>vinylscot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-404153</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, this record is the most obvious precursor to the horrors of Boyzone, Westlife et al, which were to visit us all much later.

There was always a question mark over how "normal" boys like the Rollers could sing their light throwaway pop songs, and still look at themselves in the mirror (apart from the obvious "perks" of the screaming girls etc.).

I was always a pop fan, and while I didn't like them (the Rollers) much, I could see the merit in the likes of "Shang-A-Lang" and "Summer Love Sensation", and I could understand why they switched to covers like "I Only Wanna Be With You" and "Bye Bye Baby" to avoid "sameness" setting in.

However, my abiding memory of this song is that even the Rollers didn't seem to be enjoying it much.... as if it was bad enough being forced to perform silly sing-along numbers, but expecting them to do soppy ballads was just one step too far.

Ballads often attract buyers who would not usually buy songs by a particular group or artist, and that factor (IMO) helped this slice of mediocrity to its success. 

"Rollermania" was already on the wane in the UK by this time, strangely as this followed their biggest hit, but, in retrospect, the Rollers never really had been much of a force at all, even at their peak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, this record is the most obvious precursor to the horrors of Boyzone, Westlife et al, which were to visit us all much later.</p>
<p>There was always a question mark over how &#8220;normal&#8221; boys like the Rollers could sing their light throwaway pop songs, and still look at themselves in the mirror (apart from the obvious &#8220;perks&#8221; of the screaming girls etc.).</p>
<p>I was always a pop fan, and while I didn&#8217;t like them (the Rollers) much, I could see the merit in the likes of &#8220;Shang-A-Lang&#8221; and &#8220;Summer Love Sensation&#8221;, and I could understand why they switched to covers like &#8220;I Only Wanna Be With You&#8221; and &#8220;Bye Bye Baby&#8221; to avoid &#8220;sameness&#8221; setting in.</p>
<p>However, my abiding memory of this song is that even the Rollers didn&#8217;t seem to be enjoying it much&#8230;. as if it was bad enough being forced to perform silly sing-along numbers, but expecting them to do soppy ballads was just one step too far.</p>
<p>Ballads often attract buyers who would not usually buy songs by a particular group or artist, and that factor (IMO) helped this slice of mediocrity to its success. </p>
<p>&#8220;Rollermania&#8221; was already on the wane in the UK by this time, strangely as this followed their biggest hit, but, in retrospect, the Rollers never really had been much of a force at all, even at their peak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan M.</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-403797</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 14:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-403797</guid>
		<description>damn, I wish we could be talking about "Jive Talkin'" or "What the Man Said," or "The Hustle...!"  

This, the previous and the next entry make 3 in a row that, as far as I know, never registered at all in the American top 40 -- I never heard any of them before (and still haven't, though I'll work on it.  I guess.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>damn, I wish we could be talking about &#8220;Jive Talkin&#8217;&#8221; or &#8220;What the Man Said,&#8221; or &#8220;The Hustle&#8230;!&#8221;  </p>
<p>This, the previous and the next entry make 3 in a row that, as far as I know, never registered at all in the American top 40 &#8212; I never heard any of them before (and still haven&#8217;t, though I&#8217;ll work on it.  I guess.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldo</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-403388</link>
		<dc:creator>Waldo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 07:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-403388</guid>
		<description>Lordy, Lordy! Whenever I piss off for a few days, I always come back to a right old carry-on. Last time, a punch up with a quickly reconsidered McGoohanesque resignation.  This time, something resembling a manic crossword puzzle straight out of "Alice in Wonderland" with the poor old Spolier Bunny barely at bay but getting madder by the second. After my next break, I shall probably return to find that you are all ficticious characters from a book I've been writing:

"These our actors,
As I foretold you, were all spirits and
Are melted into air, into thin air".  And I thought I was the nutcase!

Sooo, to the record in hand. Stomach-churning!

This wretched rubbish was surely the nadir for the Rollers as far as any pretence to good pop was concerned. This record was just fucking risible and you didn’t need Johnnie Walker to tell you that. Quite frankly, God only knows why teen girls in the UK idolised these talentless girly boys. Extraordinary.

Bye Bye, Rollers. Rollers, goodbye!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lordy, Lordy! Whenever I piss off for a few days, I always come back to a right old carry-on. Last time, a punch up with a quickly reconsidered McGoohanesque resignation.  This time, something resembling a manic crossword puzzle straight out of &#8220;Alice in Wonderland&#8221; with the poor old Spolier Bunny barely at bay but getting madder by the second. After my next break, I shall probably return to find that you are all ficticious characters from a book I&#8217;ve been writing:</p>
<p>&#8220;These our actors,<br />
As I foretold you, were all spirits and<br />
Are melted into air, into thin air&#8221;.  And I thought I was the nutcase!</p>
<p>Sooo, to the record in hand. Stomach-churning!</p>
<p>This wretched rubbish was surely the nadir for the Rollers as far as any pretence to good pop was concerned. This record was just fucking risible and you didn’t need Johnnie Walker to tell you that. Quite frankly, God only knows why teen girls in the UK idolised these talentless girly boys. Extraordinary.</p>
<p>Bye Bye, Rollers. Rollers, goodbye!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-403141</link>
		<dc:creator>pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-403141</guid>
		<description>as the debates between "what's number one" and "what's really number one" and "what should be number one" are pretty central to the social value of pop, i think i would argue that a chart-returns system that was utterly exact and ungameably accurate and infallible would lead to a net diminution in the interest and use of chart-watching -- we NEED martyrs and secret majorities and the vast but hidden bit of the iceberg to keep us paying attention and investing and thinking

ie if the question is "what was everying thinking?", the answer "seems to be this, but could have been THIS" is more dynamic and revealing than something cut and dried and fixed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as the debates between &#8220;what&#8217;s number one&#8221; and &#8220;what&#8217;s really number one&#8221; and &#8220;what should be number one&#8221; are pretty central to the social value of pop, i think i would argue that a chart-returns system that was utterly exact and ungameably accurate and infallible would lead to a net diminution in the interest and use of chart-watching &#8212; we NEED martyrs and secret majorities and the vast but hidden bit of the iceberg to keep us paying attention and investing and thinking</p>
<p>ie if the question is &#8220;what was everying thinking?&#8221;, the answer &#8220;seems to be this, but could have been THIS&#8221; is more dynamic and revealing than something cut and dried and fixed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcello Carlin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-403136</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcello Carlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-403136</guid>
		<description>The most outrageous example of this was of course "Planet Rock" by Bambaataa, which is kind of the beginning of the last 25 years of music, which stopped at #49 on the Billboard Hot 100 in 1982 despite allegedly selling two million plus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most outrageous example of this was of course &#8220;Planet Rock&#8221; by Bambaataa, which is kind of the beginning of the last 25 years of music, which stopped at #49 on the Billboard Hot 100 in 1982 despite allegedly selling two million plus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roadhog</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402941</link>
		<dc:creator>Roadhog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402941</guid>
		<description>Further to my comment above an example would be Acen's "Trip to the Moon" which only reached something like 39 on the pop charts but which according to what I understand should easily have made the Top Ten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to my comment above an example would be Acen&#8217;s &#8220;Trip to the Moon&#8221; which only reached something like 39 on the pop charts but which according to what I understand should easily have made the Top Ten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roadhog</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402937</link>
		<dc:creator>Roadhog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402937</guid>
		<description>And no-ones's mentioned the best "Give a Little Love" of the lot - Nookie's hardcore classic from (I think( 1992.
And if we're talking about tracks which sold loads but didn't get the deserved places in the charts look no further than dance/club tracks. Both pre and post-1988 many (and in some caes most)of the sales were in specialist dance record shops which were very unlikely to be chart return shops.For all you rock fans out there you should be very glad of this as the rave inundation of the charts in 1992 would have been twice as great if this anomaly hadn't existed...if only</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And no-ones&#8217;s mentioned the best &#8220;Give a Little Love&#8221; of the lot - Nookie&#8217;s hardcore classic from (I think( 1992.<br />
And if we&#8217;re talking about tracks which sold loads but didn&#8217;t get the deserved places in the charts look no further than dance/club tracks. Both pre and post-1988 many (and in some caes most)of the sales were in specialist dance record shops which were very unlikely to be chart return shops.For all you rock fans out there you should be very glad of this as the rave inundation of the charts in 1992 would have been twice as great if this anomaly hadn&#8217;t existed&#8230;if only</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brown</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402932</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402932</guid>
		<description>Yippee! I guessed the anarchist collective right, although the dates don't seem to match up for the shared country, unless my geography is even worse than I thought. Either way it strikes me as a wee bit self-defeating on their part to break an obvious rule, although I should possibly hang fire until we get to it.
BTW, there is also a dubious Number One in 1987, but nothing was denied by it so we shall wait until we get there.

@66 - Are you sure it outsold everything else? My understanding was that the "problem" was in getting sales awards, since it was on a non-BPI label, rather than any chart appearance. Evidently, it was in the chart.

@15 - Guinness tells me that Aswad's 'Give A Little Love' was a cover version of a Bucks Fizz B-side. The mind boggles. Needless to say, Daniel O'Donnell's only Top 10 single is yet a third song and apparently there's a fourth one by The Invisible Man. Yet of all these the Aswad hit is the only one I can remember; I think I mentioned before that for those of us not around at the time the Rollers have very much been reduced to one song.
Of course, I could remedy that, but reading the other posts I don't think I will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yippee! I guessed the anarchist collective right, although the dates don&#8217;t seem to match up for the shared country, unless my geography is even worse than I thought. Either way it strikes me as a wee bit self-defeating on their part to break an obvious rule, although I should possibly hang fire until we get to it.<br />
BTW, there is also a dubious Number One in 1987, but nothing was denied by it so we shall wait until we get there.</p>
<p>@66 - Are you sure it outsold everything else? My understanding was that the &#8220;problem&#8221; was in getting sales awards, since it was on a non-BPI label, rather than any chart appearance. Evidently, it was in the chart.</p>
<p>@15 - Guinness tells me that Aswad&#8217;s &#8216;Give A Little Love&#8217; was a cover version of a Bucks Fizz B-side. The mind boggles. Needless to say, Daniel O&#8217;Donnell&#8217;s only Top 10 single is yet a third song and apparently there&#8217;s a fourth one by The Invisible Man. Yet of all these the Aswad hit is the only one I can remember; I think I mentioned before that for those of us not around at the time the Rollers have very much been reduced to one song.<br />
Of course, I could remedy that, but reading the other posts I don&#8217;t think I will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff w</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402905</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402905</guid>
		<description>Further to #70 and #71, the entirety of the data in the Cherry Red Indie Hits 1980-89 book is now online:
http://www.cherryred.co.uk/books/indiehits/index.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to #70 and #71, the entirety of the data in the Cherry Red Indie Hits 1980-89 book is now online:<br />
<a href="http://www.cherryred.co.uk/books/indiehits/index.htm" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.cherryred.co.uk/books/indiehits/index.htm?referer=');">http://www.cherryred.co.uk/books/indiehits/index.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crag</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402844</link>
		<dc:creator>crag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402844</guid>
		<description>Its a while off yet and obv the choice is yours - compared to '77 phantom its hardly pivotal although its about the only one of that deludge of postumous #1s the artist in question had at the time that i can really stomach - and i'm a fan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a while off yet and obv the choice is yours - compared to &#8216;77 phantom its hardly pivotal although its about the only one of that deludge of postumous #1s the artist in question had at the time that i can really stomach - and i&#8217;m a fan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402834</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402834</guid>
		<description>I'd forgotten the FAQs! I was doing some Popular statto stuff last night.

Good point on the 1980/1 phantom - is it not the case that it was by someone who had a lot of other #s around that time, so we can discuss it in with those I think. I will try and remember though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d forgotten the FAQs! I was doing some Popular statto stuff last night.</p>
<p>Good point on the 1980/1 phantom - is it not the case that it was by someone who had a lot of other #s around that time, so we can discuss it in with those I think. I will try and remember though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erithian</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402833</link>
		<dc:creator>Erithian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402833</guid>
		<description>This is an exchange for your FAQs list when you get around to it, Tom...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an exchange for your FAQs list when you get around to it, Tom&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crag</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402827</link>
		<dc:creator>crag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402827</guid>
		<description>The only phantom #1 that was undeniably the best selling single nationwide in a specific week is the Christmas 1980/81 one. I think the '77 one should definitely be discussed, however, being as it is hugely significant in the history of pop AND of the pop charts themselves..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only phantom #1 that was undeniably the best selling single nationwide in a specific week is the Christmas 1980/81 one. I think the &#8216;77 one should definitely be discussed, however, being as it is hugely significant in the history of pop AND of the pop charts themselves..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erithian</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402810</link>
		<dc:creator>Erithian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402810</guid>
		<description>Ah, right!  Guessed the band, guessed the country, didn’t actually know the track.  You’re right though, guessing and googling is all very much part of the fun.  And the 1976 phantom number one does deserve an honourable mention when it comes around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, right!  Guessed the band, guessed the country, didn’t actually know the track.  You’re right though, guessing and googling is all very much part of the fun.  And the 1976 phantom number one does deserve an honourable mention when it comes around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402806</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402806</guid>
		<description>AWESOME thankyou Marcello.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWESOME thankyou Marcello.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcello Carlin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402805</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcello Carlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402805</guid>
		<description>Hmm, 7 and 14 March it was, mea culpa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, 7 and 14 March it was, mea culpa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcello Carlin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402804</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcello Carlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402804</guid>
		<description>Funny you should say that:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_Indie_Chart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny you should say that:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_Indie_Chart" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_Indie_Chart?referer=');">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_Indie_Chart</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402803</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402803</guid>
		<description>Actually is there a list of indie #1s anywhere? There wasn't (or at least I couldn't find one) when I looked a few years ago, but things might have changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually is there a list of indie #1s anywhere? There wasn&#8217;t (or at least I couldn&#8217;t find one) when I looked a few years ago, but things might have changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark G</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402802</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/04/bay-city-rollers-give-a-little-love/#comment-402802</guid>
		<description>Oh, it clicked this lunchtime.

I was thinking of their other falklands song, where they don't swear on it until the final 20 seconds or so...

.. which was also out of the chart...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, it clicked this lunchtime.</p>
<p>I was thinking of their other falklands song, where they don&#8217;t swear on it until the final 20 seconds or so&#8230;</p>
<p>.. which was also out of the chart&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
