<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10cc - &#8220;I&#8217;m Not In Love&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erithian</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-536860</link>
		<dc:creator>Erithian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-536860</guid>
		<description>Take a look at post #28 upthread.  It struck me the other day that while we’re all following the Brand/Ross Phonegate saga, it’s only the likes of us Populistas who’ll be thinking of a certain Noosha Fox song whenever we hear the name of the woman involved.  Waldo, if you’re reading this, we salute you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at post #28 upthread.  It struck me the other day that while we’re all following the Brand/Ross Phonegate saga, it’s only the likes of us Populistas who’ll be thinking of a certain Noosha Fox song whenever we hear the name of the woman involved.  Waldo, if you’re reading this, we salute you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark G</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-487447</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-487447</guid>
		<description>I remember Petula Clark's Reggae-lite version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember Petula Clark&#8217;s Reggae-lite version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Smart</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-487181</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Smart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-487181</guid>
		<description>Cover version alert! I've just heard Tony Christie's interpretation for the first time. It isn't an ornate song in his hands. Nor is it a creepy one. Nor a profound one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cover version alert! I&#8217;ve just heard Tony Christie&#8217;s interpretation for the first time. It isn&#8217;t an ornate song in his hands. Nor is it a creepy one. Nor a profound one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Skidmore</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-406688</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Skidmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-406688</guid>
		<description>Responding very late to that comment about Tammy and hubby that Tom made, the song you're looking for is She Thinks I Still Care, as recorded by George Jones (Mr Tammy Wynette) for a country #1 in 1962. It's very, very similar in its conceit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Responding very late to that comment about Tammy and hubby that Tom made, the song you&#8217;re looking for is She Thinks I Still Care, as recorded by George Jones (Mr Tammy Wynette) for a country #1 in 1962. It&#8217;s very, very similar in its conceit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-402771</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-402771</guid>
		<description>(But on INIL I think the cleverness works absolutely in favour of the song.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(But on INIL I think the cleverness works absolutely in favour of the song.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-402769</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-402769</guid>
		<description>With 10cc I don't think it's their cleverness per se which is offputting to me, more that I don't share their sense of humour or wit. One of the things with "cleverness" is the way it's often expressed through puns, wordplay, allusions, jokes, but this is a more dangerous territory than just being smart bcz jokes (however clever they are) won't work unless they make you smile (this is the issue a lot of people have with Zappa). What makes Costello work more than 10cc, for me, is the way he manages often to be clever without necessarily being witty or wry or ironic.

The other potential problem with "cleverness" is that it can be paradoxically undemanding of its audience: it can create a sense of "well done, you're in the club that can appreciate this, now put your feet up" (I get this from a lot of indie with ostensibly smart lyrics, but maybe I'm being chippy and looking for it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With 10cc I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s their cleverness per se which is offputting to me, more that I don&#8217;t share their sense of humour or wit. One of the things with &#8220;cleverness&#8221; is the way it&#8217;s often expressed through puns, wordplay, allusions, jokes, but this is a more dangerous territory than just being smart bcz jokes (however clever they are) won&#8217;t work unless they make you smile (this is the issue a lot of people have with Zappa). What makes Costello work more than 10cc, for me, is the way he manages often to be clever without necessarily being witty or wry or ironic.</p>
<p>The other potential problem with &#8220;cleverness&#8221; is that it can be paradoxically undemanding of its audience: it can create a sense of &#8220;well done, you&#8217;re in the club that can appreciate this, now put your feet up&#8221; (I get this from a lot of indie with ostensibly smart lyrics, but maybe I&#8217;m being chippy and looking for it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosie</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-402766</link>
		<dc:creator>rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-402766</guid>
		<description>But I think Elvis Costello, and Squeeze for that matter, are/were wonderful!  And Sting too.  I'm sure you meant to mention him.

For me, clever = sexy.  Which is probably why I'll be right out on a limb when we come to discuss punk.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I think Elvis Costello, and Squeeze for that matter, are/were wonderful!  And Sting too.  I&#8217;m sure you meant to mention him.</p>
<p>For me, clever = sexy.  Which is probably why I&#8217;ll be right out on a limb when we come to discuss punk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinylscot</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-402746</link>
		<dc:creator>vinylscot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-402746</guid>
		<description>Comments on this seem to be mainly very positive, which is to be expected - it is a very good song.

However, and one or two people have alluded to this already, to me its cleverness has always slightly spoiled the overall effect. It's as if they have tried to do too much here, the song challenges you to think about it... and when you do you come up with some things you don't quite like, the messy stain, big boys don't cry etc..

I can acknowledge that, at 14 at the time, I maybe didn't really understand it all but even now it sounds hackneyed and clumsy to me - not just the emotions of the person singing, but the SONG itself.

Much like other "clever" English writers such as Elvis Costello, and Difford/Tilbrook, 10CC's cleverness often got in the way and diminished from what could have been fantastic songs.

As someone stated earlier, this is a song I can admire and appreciate, rather than a song I like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comments on this seem to be mainly very positive, which is to be expected - it is a very good song.</p>
<p>However, and one or two people have alluded to this already, to me its cleverness has always slightly spoiled the overall effect. It&#8217;s as if they have tried to do too much here, the song challenges you to think about it&#8230; and when you do you come up with some things you don&#8217;t quite like, the messy stain, big boys don&#8217;t cry etc..</p>
<p>I can acknowledge that, at 14 at the time, I maybe didn&#8217;t really understand it all but even now it sounds hackneyed and clumsy to me - not just the emotions of the person singing, but the SONG itself.</p>
<p>Much like other &#8220;clever&#8221; English writers such as Elvis Costello, and Difford/Tilbrook, 10CC&#8217;s cleverness often got in the way and diminished from what could have been fantastic songs.</p>
<p>As someone stated earlier, this is a song I can admire and appreciate, rather than a song I like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cupcake</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-402209</link>
		<dc:creator>Cupcake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-402209</guid>
		<description>Now that I've finally read all the comments (;-)), I totally agree with Rosie (#10) who has put it in much better words. (Sorry for my English...).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that I&#8217;ve finally read all the comments (;-)), I totally agree with Rosie (#10) who has put it in much better words. (Sorry for my English&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cupcake</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-402069</link>
		<dc:creator>Cupcake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-402069</guid>
		<description>I haven't read all the comments, but the diversity of interpretations of this song is confusing. 

For me, the song is clearly about a person who's heart has been broken by someone, who is in love with someone who doesn't love him (anymore). So he tries to convince himself - in vain - that he hasn't really been in love and truly committed anyway. While he is enumerating the things he does which reflect being in love: "I call you up", "I like to see you", "I keep your picture", Maybe also because his pride is hurt, and he desperately tries to keep his head above the water emotionally. 

He even tries to swap "sides" and feel superior by swearing that he would never love the other person (again), even if the feeling was mutual ("You'll wait a long time for me").</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read all the comments, but the diversity of interpretations of this song is confusing. </p>
<p>For me, the song is clearly about a person who&#8217;s heart has been broken by someone, who is in love with someone who doesn&#8217;t love him (anymore). So he tries to convince himself - in vain - that he hasn&#8217;t really been in love and truly committed anyway. While he is enumerating the things he does which reflect being in love: &#8220;I call you up&#8221;, &#8220;I like to see you&#8221;, &#8220;I keep your picture&#8221;, Maybe also because his pride is hurt, and he desperately tries to keep his head above the water emotionally. </p>
<p>He even tries to swap &#8220;sides&#8221; and feel superior by swearing that he would never love the other person (again), even if the feeling was mutual (&#8221;You&#8217;ll wait a long time for me&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henry s</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-402038</link>
		<dc:creator>henry s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-402038</guid>
		<description>but how can this be a good example when the intro is almost exactly the same as another, equally popular song ("She's Gone")?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but how can this be a good example when the intro is almost exactly the same as another, equally popular song (&#8221;She&#8217;s Gone&#8221;)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401902</link>
		<dc:creator>pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401902</guid>
		<description>Yes this is an argument Eno has been makin for years: that song identity in pop is less melody or words than "instant architecture" (&lt;-- not his phrase)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes this is an argument Eno has been makin for years: that song identity in pop is less melody or words than &#8220;instant architecture&#8221; (<&#8211; not his phrase)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401900</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401900</guid>
		<description>i recall a telly show (about musical plagiarism i think) with some musicologist using this track, specifically the intro, as an example of how little of a song you needed to ID it - i think to make the point that credit is not about length of sample, but some abstract 'distinctiveness'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i recall a telly show (about musical plagiarism i think) with some musicologist using this track, specifically the intro, as an example of how little of a song you needed to ID it - i think to make the point that credit is not about length of sample, but some abstract &#8216;distinctiveness&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401660</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401660</guid>
		<description>Just in case it wasn't clear from the entry, I don't think it's heavy-handed either: I'm posing the question rhetorically in order to refute it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case it wasn&#8217;t clear from the entry, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s heavy-handed either: I&#8217;m posing the question rhetorically in order to refute it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim davidge</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401613</link>
		<dc:creator>tim davidge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401613</guid>
		<description>This has obviously provoked a lot of thought, but then, it’s a thought-provoking record, one of the more cerebral of the year, and especially so by singles standards. To the extent that the song has a meaning for me apart from being part of the soundtrack to what turned out to be a pleasant summer, I suppose it’s a song about withholding feelings, or alternatively the rather tragic case of someone who really hasn’t got any feelings to withhold because they’re incapable of having them in the first place. I don’t, however, see the ‘stalking’ connection. As for the production, Joe Meek would have been proud of these guys. If the backing sounds like voices recorded over and over again, it’s probably because that’s what it consists of. Something in there sound like a kazoo? It’s because…... And there was that faint, puttering beat in the background, a touch so subtle that if you only ever head the song on a car radio or on a pocket transistor, you probably wouldn’t even have been aware that it was there. A heavy handed record? I don’t think so. It was a lot of things, but not that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has obviously provoked a lot of thought, but then, it’s a thought-provoking record, one of the more cerebral of the year, and especially so by singles standards. To the extent that the song has a meaning for me apart from being part of the soundtrack to what turned out to be a pleasant summer, I suppose it’s a song about withholding feelings, or alternatively the rather tragic case of someone who really hasn’t got any feelings to withhold because they’re incapable of having them in the first place. I don’t, however, see the ‘stalking’ connection. As for the production, Joe Meek would have been proud of these guys. If the backing sounds like voices recorded over and over again, it’s probably because that’s what it consists of. Something in there sound like a kazoo? It’s because…&#8230; And there was that faint, puttering beat in the background, a touch so subtle that if you only ever head the song on a car radio or on a pocket transistor, you probably wouldn’t even have been aware that it was there. A heavy handed record? I don’t think so. It was a lot of things, but not that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldo</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401548</link>
		<dc:creator>Waldo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401548</guid>
		<description># 44 - "but then imagine it being sung softly by a stranger onto your answer machine."

In some circumstances, this would be rather nice. Gwen Cooper from "Torchwood", for example. Trouble is, I'd probably end up with Captain Jack Harkness "belling" me.

Down, Mike!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 44 - &#8220;but then imagine it being sung softly by a stranger onto your answer machine.&#8221;</p>
<p>In some circumstances, this would be rather nice. Gwen Cooper from &#8220;Torchwood&#8221;, for example. Trouble is, I&#8217;d probably end up with Captain Jack Harkness &#8220;belling&#8221; me.</p>
<p>Down, Mike!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosie</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401527</link>
		<dc:creator>rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401527</guid>
		<description>Poor Julie indeed!  With the exception of Little Richard, who never had a number one but appears in the list anyway all those others named only feature in my Big Random Playlist because they figure in this exercise.  Whereas Julie is there because I want her to be, and I'd choose to listen to her other than randomly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Julie indeed!  With the exception of Little Richard, who never had a number one but appears in the list anyway all those others named only feature in my Big Random Playlist because they figure in this exercise.  Whereas Julie is there because I want her to be, and I&#8217;d choose to listen to her other than randomly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew H</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401474</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401474</guid>
		<description>Not much to add, except this is also a heavy presence on Daft Punk's 'Nightvision'.

I had a cassette of the Johnny Logan album - no idea why, and no idea where it is now - that his cover appeared on. It was the rush-release to accompany his second Eurovision winner 'Hold Me Now' and my vague recollections suggest it was fairly faithful. It was hardly going to be radical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not much to add, except this is also a heavy presence on Daft Punk&#8217;s &#8216;Nightvision&#8217;.</p>
<p>I had a cassette of the Johnny Logan album - no idea why, and no idea where it is now - that his cover appeared on. It was the rush-release to accompany his second Eurovision winner &#8216;Hold Me Now&#8217; and my vague recollections suggest it was fairly faithful. It was hardly going to be radical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcello Carlin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401430</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcello Carlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401430</guid>
		<description>I had a look at that '57 chart and to be fair there was quite a lot of competition but also there was the bizarre factor of several artists having two entries in the Top 20, including Lonnie Donegan, Pat Boone, Little Richard, Frankie Lymon, Guy Mitchell, Johnnie Ray and even Tab Hunter.  Whereas poor Julie only had the one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a look at that &#8216;57 chart and to be fair there was quite a lot of competition but also there was the bizarre factor of several artists having two entries in the Top 20, including Lonnie Donegan, Pat Boone, Little Richard, Frankie Lymon, Guy Mitchell, Johnnie Ray and even Tab Hunter.  Whereas poor Julie only had the one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crag</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401425</link>
		<dc:creator>crag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 09:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401425</guid>
		<description>Julie London's CMAR certainly is a total classic- if asked which song i prefered (JL's or JT's) i think it would be to close to call- they're both magnificent in different ways. In fact a good halfway point both historically and musically between London's smooth chilly performance and and the psychedelic futurepop of Timberlake's track would be...oh yes, I'm Not In Love by 10cc!
(do u see what i did there?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie London&#8217;s CMAR certainly is a total classic- if asked which song i prefered (JL&#8217;s or JT&#8217;s) i think it would be to close to call- they&#8217;re both magnificent in different ways. In fact a good halfway point both historically and musically between London&#8217;s smooth chilly performance and and the psychedelic futurepop of Timberlake&#8217;s track would be&#8230;oh yes, I&#8217;m Not In Love by 10cc!<br />
(do u see what i did there?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erithian</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401423</link>
		<dc:creator>Erithian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 09:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401423</guid>
		<description>The somewhat underrated Mari Wilson did a fine version of CMAR as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The somewhat underrated Mari Wilson did a fine version of CMAR as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosie</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401417</link>
		<dc:creator>rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 09:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401417</guid>
		<description>A little research on Wikipedia tells me that Julie London got to number 22 with CMAR in 1957.  That feels like an injustice to me, or maybe 1957 audiences in Britain weren't ready for something which, to me at least, seems so timeless.

I also noted a most impressive list of others who have recorded it.  Some of the names boggle the mind, but having thought that Billie Holiday would have sent the song into orbit, she's not on the list.  All the same, Julie London gives it a silky menace that would be hard to match.

Swerving, I had an idea for a collection of short stories based on songs (yes, yes, I've no doubt it's been done before.)  CMAR would make a good basis for one, and so, returning to topic, and taking the current debate into account, would INIL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little research on Wikipedia tells me that Julie London got to number 22 with CMAR in 1957.  That feels like an injustice to me, or maybe 1957 audiences in Britain weren&#8217;t ready for something which, to me at least, seems so timeless.</p>
<p>I also noted a most impressive list of others who have recorded it.  Some of the names boggle the mind, but having thought that Billie Holiday would have sent the song into orbit, she&#8217;s not on the list.  All the same, Julie London gives it a silky menace that would be hard to match.</p>
<p>Swerving, I had an idea for a collection of short stories based on songs (yes, yes, I&#8217;ve no doubt it&#8217;s been done before.)  CMAR would make a good basis for one, and so, returning to topic, and taking the current debate into account, would INIL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erithian</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401407</link>
		<dc:creator>Erithian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 08:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401407</guid>
		<description>This was part of a quiz question I used a couple of years back – along with tATu’s “All The Things She Said” and Oasis’s “Songbird” it was the first UK top three to comprise entirely recycled titles (Simple Minds and Kenny G having used the other titles).

I’m with Mike and Brian above on the stalker angle and preference for 10cc’s other, sparkier, singles (particularly I’m Mandy), and for me the subtle bass line under the “Big boys don’t cry” section is the best thing about this one.  But that’s the joy of Popular, in that people who care deeply about a song can express just why it moves them so, and the analysis and discussion open up entire new vistas on the songs and the music.  More power to its elbow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was part of a quiz question I used a couple of years back – along with tATu’s “All The Things She Said” and Oasis’s “Songbird” it was the first UK top three to comprise entirely recycled titles (Simple Minds and Kenny G having used the other titles).</p>
<p>I’m with Mike and Brian above on the stalker angle and preference for 10cc’s other, sparkier, singles (particularly I’m Mandy), and for me the subtle bass line under the “Big boys don’t cry” section is the best thing about this one.  But that’s the joy of Popular, in that people who care deeply about a song can express just why it moves them so, and the analysis and discussion open up entire new vistas on the songs and the music.  More power to its elbow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401297</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401297</guid>
		<description>It's a different song, though the reference is intentional - like the London track, it's a kiss-off to an ex (in this case Ms.Spears, who the video none-too-subtly references).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a different song, though the reference is intentional - like the London track, it&#8217;s a kiss-off to an ex (in this case Ms.Spears, who the video none-too-subtly references).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosie</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401290</link>
		<dc:creator>rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/03/10cc-im-not-in-love/#comment-401290</guid>
		<description>As you know, I'm not really &lt;em&gt;au fait&lt;/em&gt; with more recent developments in the singles chart as I've been too busy regressing into stuff that was before even &lt;em&gt;my&lt;/time&gt;, but would that be &lt;em&gt;Cry Me A River&lt;/em&gt; as in Julie London's &lt;em&gt;Cry Me A River&lt;/em&gt;?  Because I adore that song in that version and if it had been a number one it would have been a ten right down the middle, and Mr Timberlake surely had a cheek thinking he could come close.

But then again, maybe it was a different song...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you know, I&#8217;m not really <em>au fait</em> with more recent developments in the singles chart as I&#8217;ve been too busy regressing into stuff that was before even <em>my, but would that be </em><em>Cry Me A River</em> as in Julie London&#8217;s <em>Cry Me A River</em>?  Because I adore that song in that version and if it had been a number one it would have been a ten right down the middle, and Mr Timberlake surely had a cheek thinking he could come close.</p>
<p>But then again, maybe it was a different song&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
