<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Worst Films Of Last Year (2007) : Part 2 &#8211; 5 to 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/the-worst-films-of-last-year-2008-5-to-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/the-worst-films-of-last-year-2008-5-to-1/</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:12:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: coolaery</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/the-worst-films-of-last-year-2008-5-to-1/#comment-365620</link>
		<dc:creator>coolaery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/the-worst-films-of-last-year-2008-5-to-1/#comment-365620</guid>
		<description>2008 most awaited movies at 

http://coolaery.blogspot.com/2008/01/top-10-most-anticipitated-movies-of.html


-www.coolaery.co.nr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2008 most awaited movies at </p>
<p><a href="http://coolaery.blogspot.com/2008/01/top-10-most-anticipitated-movies-of.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/coolaery.blogspot.com/2008/01/top-10-most-anticipitated-movies-of.html?referer=');">http://coolaery.blogspot.com/2008/01/top-10-most-anticipitated-movies-of.html</a></p>
<p>-www.coolaery.co.nr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coolaery</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/the-worst-films-of-last-year-2008-5-to-1/#comment-363212</link>
		<dc:creator>coolaery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/the-worst-films-of-last-year-2008-5-to-1/#comment-363212</guid>
		<description>correct abt smolkin aces...

there promo was so rockin&#039; but the movies was a horse shit

- http://coolaery.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>correct abt smolkin aces&#8230;</p>
<p>there promo was so rockin&#8217; but the movies was a horse shit</p>
<p>- <a href="http://coolaery.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/coolaery.blogspot.com/?referer=');">http://coolaery.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Baran</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/the-worst-films-of-last-year-2008-5-to-1/#comment-362714</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Baran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/the-worst-films-of-last-year-2008-5-to-1/#comment-362714</guid>
		<description>Thanks you for saying some of what I was trying to say better than what I did.

Also I think Robinsons is worse because as a U it has the potential to offend more people!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks you for saying some of what I was trying to say better than what I did.</p>
<p>Also I think Robinsons is worse because as a U it has the potential to offend more people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan M.</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/the-worst-films-of-last-year-2008-5-to-1/#comment-362698</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/the-worst-films-of-last-year-2008-5-to-1/#comment-362698</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much for giving &quot;23&quot; the place of honor it deserves (i didn&#039;t see the Robinsons, so I&#039;ll settle for the 2nd place finish).  I tried hard to forget the film as soon as I had seen it, so I can&#039;t add much to your review, except to agree that its whole idea of what would constitute a compelling story-within-a-story is embarrassingly illiterate and vapid, and the noir hommage/send-up or whatever it&#039;s supposed to be could be compared to a noir send-up from, say, the Carol Burnett Show.  Add the utter idiocy of the characters&#039; behavior, its combination of pretentiousness and underestimation of audience intelligence, and it resulted in a movie which was not merely BAD, as the reviews of the time thankfully got right, but SO bad that just thinking about it now makes me want to crush the director under the heel of my shoe... and then GRIND...  I realize that I probably won&#039;t have that opportunity, but your skewering of &quot;23&quot; is almost as satisfying.  Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for giving &#8220;23&#8243; the place of honor it deserves (i didn&#8217;t see the Robinsons, so I&#8217;ll settle for the 2nd place finish).  I tried hard to forget the film as soon as I had seen it, so I can&#8217;t add much to your review, except to agree that its whole idea of what would constitute a compelling story-within-a-story is embarrassingly illiterate and vapid, and the noir hommage/send-up or whatever it&#8217;s supposed to be could be compared to a noir send-up from, say, the Carol Burnett Show.  Add the utter idiocy of the characters&#8217; behavior, its combination of pretentiousness and underestimation of audience intelligence, and it resulted in a movie which was not merely BAD, as the reviews of the time thankfully got right, but SO bad that just thinking about it now makes me want to crush the director under the heel of my shoe&#8230; and then GRIND&#8230;  I realize that I probably won&#8217;t have that opportunity, but your skewering of &#8220;23&#8243; is almost as satisfying.  Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/the-worst-films-of-last-year-2008-5-to-1/#comment-362677</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 15:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/the-worst-films-of-last-year-2008-5-to-1/#comment-362677</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more with the review of Smokin&#039; Aces. It really ought to have been good, but was completely ruined by too big a cast and too convoluted a plot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more with the review of Smokin&#8217; Aces. It really ought to have been good, but was completely ruined by too big a cast and too convoluted a plot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

