<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s Keep Talking About &#8220;Let&#8217;s Talk About Love&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/lets-keep-talking-about-lets-talk-about-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/lets-keep-talking-about-lets-talk-about-love/</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/lets-keep-talking-about-lets-talk-about-love/#comment-373861</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/lets-keep-talking-about-lets-talk-about-love/#comment-373861</guid>
		<description>"boring default position" -- just try reading the (non-essay) Pazz and Jop &lt;a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/pazzandjop07/index.php?page=home#comments" rel="nofollow"&gt;comments&lt;/a&gt; this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;boring default position&#8221; &#8212; just try reading the (non-essay) Pazz and Jop <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/pazzandjop07/index.php?page=home#comments" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.villagevoice.com/pazzandjop07/index.php?page=home_comments&amp;referer=');">comments</a> this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/lets-keep-talking-about-lets-talk-about-love/#comment-373860</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/lets-keep-talking-about-lets-talk-about-love/#comment-373860</guid>
		<description>Carl made a good point in that exchange (and a lone anonymous commenter kind of unintentionally backed up) concerning his audience -- and I guess this book does make a lot of sense to someone who, maybe like Carl c. 1998, simply hasn't explored why they might not give ("an artist like") Celine the time of day (I recommended it to said anonymous commenter). But my question would then be where they go with that -- to me it means you've finally done what you probably should have done in the first place, and we're back at square one waiting for good writing and good arguments, in whatever form that takes. I think Carl's right that there's a certain contemptuous tone that's pretty well played out in criticism, but that's just because too many people use it as a boring default position -- contempt can be very powerful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl made a good point in that exchange (and a lone anonymous commenter kind of unintentionally backed up) concerning his audience &#8212; and I guess this book does make a lot of sense to someone who, maybe like Carl c. 1998, simply hasn&#8217;t explored why they might not give (&#8221;an artist like&#8221;) Celine the time of day (I recommended it to said anonymous commenter). But my question would then be where they go with that &#8212; to me it means you&#8217;ve finally done what you probably should have done in the first place, and we&#8217;re back at square one waiting for good writing and good arguments, in whatever form that takes. I think Carl&#8217;s right that there&#8217;s a certain contemptuous tone that&#8217;s pretty well played out in criticism, but that&#8217;s just because too many people use it as a boring default position &#8212; contempt can be very powerful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
