<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s Keep Talking About &#8220;Let&#8217;s Talk About Love&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/lets-keep-talking-about-lets-talk-about-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/lets-keep-talking-about-lets-talk-about-love/</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 23:55:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: There’s never been a time when&#8230; &#171; Writing About Music is Like Dancing About Architecture</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/lets-keep-talking-about-lets-talk-about-love/#comment-811019</link>
		<dc:creator>There’s never been a time when&#8230; &#171; Writing About Music is Like Dancing About Architecture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/lets-keep-talking-about-lets-talk-about-love/#comment-811019</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;… There’s never been a time when there hasn’t been at least a significant chunk of critics praising pop, and if there’s more now it doesn’t feel like there’s much more &#8212; only that there’s a (faulty) language to describe it. If there is a movement, I think it’s one that’s left a good deal of the readership of criticism behind, but that’s another discussion.&#8221; - Tom Ewing, “Let’s Keep Talking About Let’s Talk About Love,” Freaky Trigger, January 29, 2008 [link] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;… There’s never been a time when there hasn’t been at least a significant chunk of critics praising pop, and if there’s more now it doesn’t feel like there’s much more &#8212; only that there’s a (faulty) language to describe it. If there is a movement, I think it’s one that’s left a good deal of the readership of criticism behind, but that’s another discussion.&#8221; &#8211; Tom Ewing, “Let’s Keep Talking About Let’s Talk About Love,” Freaky Trigger, January 29, 2008 [link] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/lets-keep-talking-about-lets-talk-about-love/#comment-785674</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/lets-keep-talking-about-lets-talk-about-love/#comment-785674</guid>
		<description>Still talking...or, at least, posting relevant A/V whilst reading:

http://appendixa.net/tag/lets-talk-about-love-c-wilson/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still talking&#8230;or, at least, posting relevant A/V whilst reading:</p>
<p><a href="http://appendixa.net/tag/lets-talk-about-love-c-wilson/" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/appendixa.net/tag/lets-talk-about-love-c-wilson/?referer=');">http://appendixa.net/tag/lets-talk-about-love-c-wilson/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/lets-keep-talking-about-lets-talk-about-love/#comment-373861</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/lets-keep-talking-about-lets-talk-about-love/#comment-373861</guid>
		<description>&quot;boring default position&quot; -- just try reading the (non-essay) Pazz and Jop &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.villagevoice.com/pazzandjop07/index.php?page=home#comments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;comments&lt;/a&gt; this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;boring default position&#8221; &#8212; just try reading the (non-essay) Pazz and Jop <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/pazzandjop07/index.php?page=home#comments" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.villagevoice.com/pazzandjop07/index.php?page=home_comments&amp;referer=');">comments</a> this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/lets-keep-talking-about-lets-talk-about-love/#comment-373860</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/01/lets-keep-talking-about-lets-talk-about-love/#comment-373860</guid>
		<description>Carl made a good point in that exchange (and a lone anonymous commenter kind of unintentionally backed up) concerning his audience -- and I guess this book does make a lot of sense to someone who, maybe like Carl c. 1998, simply hasn&#039;t explored why they might not give (&quot;an artist like&quot;) Celine the time of day (I recommended it to said anonymous commenter). But my question would then be where they go with that -- to me it means you&#039;ve finally done what you probably should have done in the first place, and we&#039;re back at square one waiting for good writing and good arguments, in whatever form that takes. I think Carl&#039;s right that there&#039;s a certain contemptuous tone that&#039;s pretty well played out in criticism, but that&#039;s just because too many people use it as a boring default position -- contempt can be very powerful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl made a good point in that exchange (and a lone anonymous commenter kind of unintentionally backed up) concerning his audience &#8212; and I guess this book does make a lot of sense to someone who, maybe like Carl c. 1998, simply hasn&#8217;t explored why they might not give (&#8220;an artist like&#8221;) Celine the time of day (I recommended it to said anonymous commenter). But my question would then be where they go with that &#8212; to me it means you&#8217;ve finally done what you probably should have done in the first place, and we&#8217;re back at square one waiting for good writing and good arguments, in whatever form that takes. I think Carl&#8217;s right that there&#8217;s a certain contemptuous tone that&#8217;s pretty well played out in criticism, but that&#8217;s just because too many people use it as a boring default position &#8212; contempt can be very powerful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

