<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: i&#8217;ve got a PIANO and i&#8217;m goin to use it!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/06/ive-got-a-piano-and-im-goin-to-use-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/06/ive-got-a-piano-and-im-goin-to-use-it/</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 23:55:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/06/ive-got-a-piano-and-im-goin-to-use-it/#comment-287793</link>
		<dc:creator>pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 08:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/06/ive-got-a-piano-and-im-goin-to-use-it/#comment-287793</guid>
		<description>frank asked me a question on lj abt this prelude -- viz which it is (ans = the one sometimes called the &quot;raindrop&quot; prelude) -- which made me think a bit more abt chopin

i. i learnt several other preludes at school besides D flat (G, Emin, Bmin, A, C min, G min) (haha also known as the EASY ONES tho the last sounds harder than it is); i didn&#039;t thini much abt (or of) chopin then -- he is often referred to a bit disdainfully as a &quot;salon composer&quot; (=minor romantic), and i wz studying music history and absorbed its silly prejudices

ii. what now fascinates me about him is his fascination with WHAT THE HANDS CAN DO -- he was a virtuoso pianist, and lots of his preludes are really compact little practical essays in how a particular hand-shape and movement can be expanded and focused into a piece; a lot of the handshapes in question being particular to him (ie the ideas -- as physical possiiblities to be explored -- didn&#039;t seem to enter the composer bloodstream): there are two other preludes i&#039;d like to get the trick of, which exactly fit this bill (C and D)

iii. i guess i wd say there is something anti-romantic, art-and-crafts-as-proto-modernist abt his mode of address -- the MATERIAL as drive (where material includes the idea of WHAT HANDS CAN DO); it&#039;s incredibly tactile, and shaped to be tactile (cf under the fingers), and hence anti-idealist (hence why he fell out frontline 19th-century appeal i guess)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>frank asked me a question on lj abt this prelude &#8212; viz which it is (ans = the one sometimes called the &#8220;raindrop&#8221; prelude) &#8212; which made me think a bit more abt chopin</p>
<p>i. i learnt several other preludes at school besides D flat (G, Emin, Bmin, A, C min, G min) (haha also known as the EASY ONES tho the last sounds harder than it is); i didn&#8217;t thini much abt (or of) chopin then &#8212; he is often referred to a bit disdainfully as a &#8220;salon composer&#8221; (=minor romantic), and i wz studying music history and absorbed its silly prejudices</p>
<p>ii. what now fascinates me about him is his fascination with WHAT THE HANDS CAN DO &#8212; he was a virtuoso pianist, and lots of his preludes are really compact little practical essays in how a particular hand-shape and movement can be expanded and focused into a piece; a lot of the handshapes in question being particular to him (ie the ideas &#8212; as physical possiiblities to be explored &#8212; didn&#8217;t seem to enter the composer bloodstream): there are two other preludes i&#8217;d like to get the trick of, which exactly fit this bill (C and D)</p>
<p>iii. i guess i wd say there is something anti-romantic, art-and-crafts-as-proto-modernist abt his mode of address &#8212; the MATERIAL as drive (where material includes the idea of WHAT HANDS CAN DO); it&#8217;s incredibly tactile, and shaped to be tactile (cf under the fingers), and hence anti-idealist (hence why he fell out frontline 19th-century appeal i guess)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/06/ive-got-a-piano-and-im-goin-to-use-it/#comment-287649</link>
		<dc:creator>pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 22:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/06/ive-got-a-piano-and-im-goin-to-use-it/#comment-287649</guid>
		<description>TODAY&#039;S PRACTICE: poodled around on iv, vi, vii, ix and x 

dull repeat-many-times-over on hand-moves i just can&#039;t get right without slowing or pausing -- what&#039;s always super-frustratin about these is  that you never show improvement at the time, you do it lots then leave it and forget abt it and when you come back to two weeks later yr fingers know what to do (except when they don&#039;t) 

in x the little trick i learnt at EMP (of all places!) for playing four-against-three is paying off -- this will takes loads of work to get up to speed but i love how even quite hard chopin just falls under yr fingers so well (charles rosen once wrote that ultra-hard chopin works brilliantly partly bcz the stuff which is hardest, the ring-and-pinkie notes, are expressive precisely bcz of the slight strain and wobble of the way they get played!) (i have no idea if this is true and doubt i will ever know but it is an awesome idea, just the kind of technicalia i like; and rosen is an actual-real plays-in-public virtuso as well as a historian and critic)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TODAY&#8217;S PRACTICE: poodled around on iv, vi, vii, ix and x </p>
<p>dull repeat-many-times-over on hand-moves i just can&#8217;t get right without slowing or pausing &#8212; what&#8217;s always super-frustratin about these is  that you never show improvement at the time, you do it lots then leave it and forget abt it and when you come back to two weeks later yr fingers know what to do (except when they don&#8217;t) </p>
<p>in x the little trick i learnt at EMP (of all places!) for playing four-against-three is paying off &#8212; this will takes loads of work to get up to speed but i love how even quite hard chopin just falls under yr fingers so well (charles rosen once wrote that ultra-hard chopin works brilliantly partly bcz the stuff which is hardest, the ring-and-pinkie notes, are expressive precisely bcz of the slight strain and wobble of the way they get played!) (i have no idea if this is true and doubt i will ever know but it is an awesome idea, just the kind of technicalia i like; and rosen is an actual-real plays-in-public virtuso as well as a historian and critic)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/06/ive-got-a-piano-and-im-goin-to-use-it/#comment-287025</link>
		<dc:creator>pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/06/ive-got-a-piano-and-im-goin-to-use-it/#comment-287025</guid>
		<description>haha anti-swank reality check -- the minute waltz currently takes me EIGHT MINUTES (without &quot;stopping&quot; and with MANY typos)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha anti-swank reality check &#8212; the minute waltz currently takes me EIGHT MINUTES (without &#8220;stopping&#8221; and with MANY typos)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

