<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redesigns On you Audience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:54:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarsmileSteve</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269749</link>
		<dc:creator>CarsmileSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 21:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269749</guid>
		<description>oh, it&#039;s always done that, my rss reader window is k-tiny and i&#039;ve just got used to scrolling down when clicking through...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, it&#8217;s always done that, my rss reader window is k-tiny and i&#8217;ve just got used to scrolling down when clicking through&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269647</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 16:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269647</guid>
		<description>thanks for the spot! i did a quick check and yr right. IE is doing something wrong with the CSS of the category bar graphic. how long has it been doing that? i&#039;m pretty sure it didn&#039;t do it when we changed designs last year - as i check on IE and always try varying widths to test things out.

:-(

will fiddle...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the spot! i did a quick check and yr right. IE is doing something wrong with the CSS of the category bar graphic. how long has it been doing that? i&#8217;m pretty sure it didn&#8217;t do it when we changed designs last year &#8211; as i check on IE and always try varying widths to test things out.</p>
<p>:-(</p>
<p>will fiddle&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269640</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 16:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269640</guid>
		<description>Speaking of which, admin I have an FT related note - if my IE (windows, v6) window is smaller than &quot;a certain size&quot; then FT goes completely b0rked with a huuuuge whitespace gap at the top, until you scroll down past the link section. A couple of times I had thought the entire site was down and clicked away before remembering to pg down a couple of times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of which, admin I have an FT related note &#8211; if my IE (windows, v6) window is smaller than &#8220;a certain size&#8221; then FT goes completely b0rked with a huuuuge whitespace gap at the top, until you scroll down past the link section. A couple of times I had thought the entire site was down and clicked away before remembering to pg down a couple of times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: byebyepride</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269593</link>
		<dc:creator>byebyepride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 14:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269593</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s correct. 

hic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s correct. </p>
<p>hic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269532</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 12:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269532</guid>
		<description>it is now called the scotch office, innit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is now called the scotch office, innit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: byebyepride</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269526</link>
		<dc:creator>byebyepride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 11:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269526</guid>
		<description>Dear the guardian, 
next time you mention the Scottish Office on yr front page, please note that it doesn&#039;t exist anymore. kthxbye.
yrs, a reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear the guardian,<br />
next time you mention the Scottish Office on yr front page, please note that it doesn&#8217;t exist anymore. kthxbye.<br />
yrs, a reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Baran</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269510</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Baran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 11:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269510</guid>
		<description>Ah, &quot;toggle window to fit&quot; explains it. (BTW I took out Mac games joke bcs it did not belong here, and would make all your comments look weird - MAC USER alert).

I noticed the fixed width thing, which onmy browser has a left margin and a right white margin. When I decrease window size the left margin goes first, and then the right, followed by pictures etc. 

I like it by the way Guardian journos watching (I know who you are...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, &#8220;toggle window to fit&#8221; explains it. (BTW I took out Mac games joke bcs it did not belong here, and would make all your comments look weird &#8211; MAC USER alert).</p>
<p>I noticed the fixed width thing, which onmy browser has a left margin and a right white margin. When I decrease window size the left margin goes first, and then the right, followed by pictures etc. </p>
<p>I like it by the way Guardian journos watching (I know who you are&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269502</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 11:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269502</guid>
		<description>btw the guardian site is fixed-width. what happens with the mac browser is that there is a &#039;toggle window to fit&#039; button (instead of take up all the screen button) and it fits the browser to fit the site. in my case my usual browser width is about that of the GU site

anyway, not to get sidetracked. are we going to see wider fixed-width sites? GU site is still ~1024</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw the guardian site is fixed-width. what happens with the mac browser is that there is a &#8216;toggle window to fit&#8217; button (instead of take up all the screen button) and it fits the browser to fit the site. in my case my usual browser width is about that of the GU site</p>
<p>anyway, not to get sidetracked. are we going to see wider fixed-width sites? GU site is still ~1024</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269501</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 10:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269501</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why has no-one pointed out there aren’t any good games for the Mac&quot;

in the ads: because that wouldn&#039;t be a good way of selling macs
in real life: ALL THE FUCKING TIME</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why has no-one pointed out there aren’t any good games for the Mac&#8221;</p>
<p>in the ads: because that wouldn&#8217;t be a good way of selling macs<br />
in real life: ALL THE FUCKING TIME</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Baran</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269500</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Baran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 10:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269500</guid>
		<description>&quot;it just seems natural to have about a hand’s width of window&quot;

See if the Mitchell and Webb Mac / PC ads were dealing with issues like this, I&#039;d be interested! 

Webb: Hello I&#039;m a Mac
Mitchell: And I&#039;m a PC
Webb: I like to have several windows open at once, all about a hands width. It just seems more natural.
Mitchell: That&#039;s not natural at all, its more natural to use the entire screen.
Webb: It doesn&#039;t seem natural to me.
Mitchell: You&#039;re a computer: NOTHING ABOUT YOU IS NATURAL.
Webb: That might be true, but you were caught with your hands down your pants in Peep Show the other week and therefore my argument wins because I&#039;m cooler.

Bing-bing-bing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it just seems natural to have about a hand’s width of window&#8221;</p>
<p>See if the Mitchell and Webb Mac / PC ads were dealing with issues like this, I&#8217;d be interested! </p>
<p>Webb: Hello I&#8217;m a Mac<br />
Mitchell: And I&#8217;m a PC<br />
Webb: I like to have several windows open at once, all about a hands width. It just seems more natural.<br />
Mitchell: That&#8217;s not natural at all, its more natural to use the entire screen.<br />
Webb: It doesn&#8217;t seem natural to me.<br />
Mitchell: You&#8217;re a computer: NOTHING ABOUT YOU IS NATURAL.<br />
Webb: That might be true, but you were caught with your hands down your pants in Peep Show the other week and therefore my argument wins because I&#8217;m cooler.</p>
<p>Bing-bing-bing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269497</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 10:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269497</guid>
		<description>macs rarely do that &#039;one application takes over the full screen&#039; thing that is the main way of working on a PC.

it just seems natural to have about a hand&#039;s width of window.

a lot of websites (FT isn&#039;t one) are fixed width anyway. fixed width sites are usually 800/1000 and must look awful full screen - lots of pointless blank/patterned border. Variable width probably look just hard to read as the text reflows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>macs rarely do that &#8216;one application takes over the full screen&#8217; thing that is the main way of working on a PC.</p>
<p>it just seems natural to have about a hand&#8217;s width of window.</p>
<p>a lot of websites (FT isn&#8217;t one) are fixed width anyway. fixed width sites are usually 800/1000 and must look awful full screen &#8211; lots of pointless blank/patterned border. Variable width probably look just hard to read as the text reflows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Baran</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269493</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Baran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 10:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269493</guid>
		<description>Why do you do that, why don&#039;t you full screen it (made a degree of sense with cascading windows but less so with tabbed browsing).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you do that, why don&#8217;t you full screen it (made a degree of sense with cascading windows but less so with tabbed browsing).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269492</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 10:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/05/redesigns-on-you-audience/#comment-269492</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archives/2007/05/10/guardian_unlimited_the_new_look_explained.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The designer speaks&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;Improvements in web browsers and computer screens mean that we can now offer a wider page than before, giving us a larger canvas &quot;

this has been bothering me for some time. i know PC users habitually have web-browsers set to &#039;full screen&#039; which means FAT layouts are coming. i have a widescreen monitor, but (on my mac) i have quite narrow browser windows (~1000 pixels) that take up less than half the width of the monitor. is there a mac/PC split on this behaviour?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archives/2007/05/10/guardian_unlimited_the_new_look_explained.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archives/2007/05/10/guardian_unlimited_the_new_look_explained.html?referer=');">The designer speaks</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Improvements in web browsers and computer screens mean that we can now offer a wider page than before, giving us a larger canvas &#8221;</p>
<p>this has been bothering me for some time. i know PC users habitually have web-browsers set to &#8216;full screen&#8217; which means FAT layouts are coming. i have a widescreen monitor, but (on my mac) i have quite narrow browser windows (~1000 pixels) that take up less than half the width of the monitor. is there a mac/PC split on this behaviour?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

