<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DIANA ROSS &#8211; &#8220;I&#8217;m Still Waiting&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 21:40:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wichita lineman</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-902439</link>
		<dc:creator>wichita lineman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-902439</guid>
		<description>I thought TB&#039;s intro to In My Own Time was pretty funny - I wouldn&#039;t want Roger Chapman moving in next door to me either. 

Did anyone mention Chapman as an influence on Feargal Sharkey? Never occurred to me at the time but hard to miss in retrospect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought TB&#8217;s intro to In My Own Time was pretty funny &#8211; I wouldn&#8217;t want Roger Chapman moving in next door to me either. </p>
<p>Did anyone mention Chapman as an influence on Feargal Sharkey? Never occurred to me at the time but hard to miss in retrospect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyPandy</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-901965</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyPandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-901965</guid>
		<description>He might have ignored &#039;Monkey Spanner&#039; now but the TOTP clip from 1971 when &#039;Double Barrel&#039; is number one is on Youtube and he seems genuinely please its number 1 - says &quot;it&#039;s&quot; sensational or words to that effect. Those 1971 TOTPs are in a different league to 1976 or anything subsequent and once again show you what we lost with the mass wipings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He might have ignored &#8216;Monkey Spanner&#8217; now but the TOTP clip from 1971 when &#8216;Double Barrel&#8217; is number one is on Youtube and he seems genuinely please its number 1 &#8211; says &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; sensational or words to that effect. Those 1971 TOTPs are in a different league to 1976 or anything subsequent and once again show you what we lost with the mass wipings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy the Swede</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-901829</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy the Swede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-901829</guid>
		<description>The intro to &quot;In My Own Time&quot; is enough to bamboozle anyone. I think it&#039;s a pity that &quot;Monkey Spanner&quot; was ignored but had to smile when Tony&#039;s rundown merely mentioned &quot;Leap Up And Down&quot; without even the group name. Why this silly record is still airbrushed out beggars belief.

Wichita - As I opined upthread, I think &quot;Remember Me&quot; was/is a fabulous offering from Diana and a good deal better than Tony&#039;s love child, which he clearly still adores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The intro to &#8220;In My Own Time&#8221; is enough to bamboozle anyone. I think it&#8217;s a pity that &#8220;Monkey Spanner&#8221; was ignored but had to smile when Tony&#8217;s rundown merely mentioned &#8220;Leap Up And Down&#8221; without even the group name. Why this silly record is still airbrushed out beggars belief.</p>
<p>Wichita &#8211; As I opined upthread, I think &#8220;Remember Me&#8221; was/is a fabulous offering from Diana and a good deal better than Tony&#8217;s love child, which he clearly still adores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wichita lineman</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-899464</link>
		<dc:creator>wichita lineman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-899464</guid>
		<description>RIP Nick Ashford who wrote Di&#039;s two hits either side of ISW - Surrender and Remember Me, both magnificent. The latter received much love on Mike&#039;s Which Decade blog, the former was first performed by UK girl group The Carrolls, with comedienne Faith Brown on lead vocals. From &#039;66, very different to D Ross&#039;s take, but it&#039;s marvellous: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHbRdQSpy_g</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIP Nick Ashford who wrote Di&#8217;s two hits either side of ISW &#8211; Surrender and Remember Me, both magnificent. The latter received much love on Mike&#8217;s Which Decade blog, the former was first performed by UK girl group The Carrolls, with comedienne Faith Brown on lead vocals. From &#8217;66, very different to D Ross&#8217;s take, but it&#8217;s marvellous: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHbRdQSpy_g" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHbRdQSpy_g&amp;referer=');">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHbRdQSpy_g</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: punctum</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-899098</link>
		<dc:creator>punctum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-899098</guid>
		<description>He seemed agreeably bamboozled by Family&#039;s &quot;In My Own Time&quot; and by Loud Heavy Rock in general.

A curiously affecting chart, that 1971 one; all songs about or by the dispossessed, whether &quot;Back Street Luv&quot; or &quot;Soldier Blue.&quot; Made me irresistibly think of the current, astonishing top five.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He seemed agreeably bamboozled by Family&#8217;s &#8220;In My Own Time&#8221; and by Loud Heavy Rock in general.</p>
<p>A curiously affecting chart, that 1971 one; all songs about or by the dispossessed, whether &#8220;Back Street Luv&#8221; or &#8220;Soldier Blue.&#8221; Made me irresistibly think of the current, astonishing top five.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy the Swede</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-898800</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy the Swede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-898800</guid>
		<description>On POTP this week, this was top and I braced myself for Tony&#039;s usual party piece about how he had personally got this released as a single. To be perfectly fair, he only mentioned it in passing this time. Five seconds max. Sensational!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On POTP this week, this was top and I braced myself for Tony&#8217;s usual party piece about how he had personally got this released as a single. To be perfectly fair, he only mentioned it in passing this time. Five seconds max. Sensational!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wichita lineman</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-654699</link>
		<dc:creator>wichita lineman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-654699</guid>
		<description>Every time he&#039;s played it since 1971! I suppose I&#039;d be pretty proud of plucking an album track, convincing UK Tamla to release it, then watching it sail to number one. Even more astonishing that UK Tamla did the same with Tears Of A Clown, then watched the parent company copy them back home where it ALSO went to number one. 

Waldo, I love Remember Me too, but always struggle with the line &quot;remember me as a big balloon.&quot; More likely to remember her as a tiny twiglet.

A similarly unflattering description - yesterday I saw a copy of the original Rave magazine* that featured Peter Frampton, &quot;the face of &#039;68&quot;, on the cover. Except the actual wording was &quot;the big new face of &#039;68&quot;. 

*in the Beatles To Bowie exhinbition at the NPG which is very good indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time he&#8217;s played it since 1971! I suppose I&#8217;d be pretty proud of plucking an album track, convincing UK Tamla to release it, then watching it sail to number one. Even more astonishing that UK Tamla did the same with Tears Of A Clown, then watched the parent company copy them back home where it ALSO went to number one. </p>
<p>Waldo, I love Remember Me too, but always struggle with the line &#8220;remember me as a big balloon.&#8221; More likely to remember her as a tiny twiglet.</p>
<p>A similarly unflattering description &#8211; yesterday I saw a copy of the original Rave magazine* that featured Peter Frampton, &#8220;the face of &#8217;68&#8243;, on the cover. Except the actual wording was &#8220;the big new face of &#8217;68&#8243;. </p>
<p>*in the Beatles To Bowie exhinbition at the NPG which is very good indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conrad</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-654597</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-654597</guid>
		<description>You are spot on Waldo.

Blackburn was a huge fan of la Ross. Mind you, he never stops going on about that anecdote!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are spot on Waldo.</p>
<p>Blackburn was a huge fan of la Ross. Mind you, he never stops going on about that anecdote!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldo</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-654566</link>
		<dc:creator>Waldo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-654566</guid>
		<description>Unless I am mistaken (and it wouldn&#039;t be the first time) Diana owes this UK #1 entirely to Tony Blackburn who had unearthed ISW as an album track and thought highly enough of it to suggest it as a single and then preceded to play it to death on his breakfast show. Blackburn was always crazy about Ross and never hid it. For me, ISW was and is perfectly alright but &quot;Remember Me&quot; was so much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless I am mistaken (and it wouldn&#8217;t be the first time) Diana owes this UK #1 entirely to Tony Blackburn who had unearthed ISW as an album track and thought highly enough of it to suggest it as a single and then preceded to play it to death on his breakfast show. Blackburn was always crazy about Ross and never hid it. For me, ISW was and is perfectly alright but &#8220;Remember Me&#8221; was so much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-642889</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-642889</guid>
		<description>[stork-boy]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/pictures/stork-boy.gif" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laban</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-571721</link>
		<dc:creator>Laban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-571721</guid>
		<description>This was covered in reggae fashion by G.T. Moore and the Reggae Guitars. I thought it was rather good at the time, not sure what it would sound like now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was covered in reggae fashion by G.T. Moore and the Reggae Guitars. I thought it was rather good at the time, not sure what it would sound like now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-423537</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 10:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-423537</guid>
		<description>Other threads with big googling-fan presence IIRC:

- Peter Sarstedt - &quot;Where Do You Go To My Lovely&quot;
- Engelbert Humperdinck - &quot;Release Me&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other threads with big googling-fan presence IIRC:</p>
<p>- Peter Sarstedt &#8211; &#8220;Where Do You Go To My Lovely&#8221;<br />
- Engelbert Humperdinck &#8211; &#8220;Release Me&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wichita lineman</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-423531</link>
		<dc:creator>wichita lineman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 10:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-423531</guid>
		<description>re 8: This was released as a single in the US, once it became a huge hit here. It only reached 63 on Billboard. Two other excellent UK Top 10 singles from Diana in &#039;71, Remember Me and Surrender, only got to 16 and 38 respectively. Possibly, during this immediate post-Supremes period, she was still more of a pop star here and had become pure celeb over there; in &#039;72 she didn&#039;t make the Hot 100 once, not even with the splendid Doobe Dood&#039;n Doobe (etc).

It&#039;s intriguing that this is the first post I&#039;ve read where rabid fans have jumped on board to defend their hero/heroine. Same thing happened when I wrote a piece elsewhere on Dream Girls (lots of these mentioned Diana&#039;s &quot;God given talent&quot; to make it just a bit creepier).

There&#039;s no doubt Miss Ross has a distinctive, probably unique voice. What Berry Gordy realised was that it could cut through over the radio unlike any other girl&#039;s in his roster. It still does, if you hear it in the background in a cafe, supermarket, wherever.

This doesn&#039;t mean that Flo&#039;s voice is worse; soul snobs would say it&#039;s technically better. It&#039;s feisty and fun, so from what we know about the lady it sounds like her, uh, soul - who knows what she&#039;d have done with You Can&#039;t Hurry Love or Love Child? And people will always defend her because she was dealt with appallingly. Not many people in pop have effectively died of a broken heart. How much more likeable does that make Flo than go-getting Di?

Mary gets the rawest deal. Always, you read that her voice was useful for nothing more than harmonies. Her solo spots on the post-Di Supremes records are the highlights for me, so sensual when she&#039;s cooing &quot;you&#039;re the man&quot; on Floy Joy. She&#039;s right there, right next to you. It does me in.

And then again... neither Flo or Mary could make the cold, still heart of I&#039;m Still Waiting, with its jumble of self-denial and self-loathing (&quot;I&#039;m just a fool&quot;) sound anywhere near as good as Diana. The almost monotone spoken part, as Tom points out, gives the game away - this boy is an excuse for her &quot;don&#039;t try to touch me&quot; walled-up heart. Which possibly makes it the greatest 45 the Shangri La&#039;s never made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re 8: This was released as a single in the US, once it became a huge hit here. It only reached 63 on Billboard. Two other excellent UK Top 10 singles from Diana in &#8217;71, Remember Me and Surrender, only got to 16 and 38 respectively. Possibly, during this immediate post-Supremes period, she was still more of a pop star here and had become pure celeb over there; in &#8217;72 she didn&#8217;t make the Hot 100 once, not even with the splendid Doobe Dood&#8217;n Doobe (etc).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s intriguing that this is the first post I&#8217;ve read where rabid fans have jumped on board to defend their hero/heroine. Same thing happened when I wrote a piece elsewhere on Dream Girls (lots of these mentioned Diana&#8217;s &#8220;God given talent&#8221; to make it just a bit creepier).</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no doubt Miss Ross has a distinctive, probably unique voice. What Berry Gordy realised was that it could cut through over the radio unlike any other girl&#8217;s in his roster. It still does, if you hear it in the background in a cafe, supermarket, wherever.</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t mean that Flo&#8217;s voice is worse; soul snobs would say it&#8217;s technically better. It&#8217;s feisty and fun, so from what we know about the lady it sounds like her, uh, soul &#8211; who knows what she&#8217;d have done with You Can&#8217;t Hurry Love or Love Child? And people will always defend her because she was dealt with appallingly. Not many people in pop have effectively died of a broken heart. How much more likeable does that make Flo than go-getting Di?</p>
<p>Mary gets the rawest deal. Always, you read that her voice was useful for nothing more than harmonies. Her solo spots on the post-Di Supremes records are the highlights for me, so sensual when she&#8217;s cooing &#8220;you&#8217;re the man&#8221; on Floy Joy. She&#8217;s right there, right next to you. It does me in.</p>
<p>And then again&#8230; neither Flo or Mary could make the cold, still heart of I&#8217;m Still Waiting, with its jumble of self-denial and self-loathing (&#8220;I&#8217;m just a fool&#8221;) sound anywhere near as good as Diana. The almost monotone spoken part, as Tom points out, gives the game away &#8211; this boy is an excuse for her &#8220;don&#8217;t try to touch me&#8221; walled-up heart. Which possibly makes it the greatest 45 the Shangri La&#8217;s never made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tivoli Eclipse</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-332269</link>
		<dc:creator>Tivoli Eclipse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-332269</guid>
		<description>MJR and MDfan... you took my breath away!  I literally held my breath while reading -- because I did not want your critical analyses to end.  If my life has been part of some grand social Matrix -- she has been the most efficient and effective dream of unrequited love -- the ideal love -- according to Hagakure.  She is the icon and iconoclast of homoeroticism, like in &quot;The Symposium,&quot; when Socrates invited Alcibiades to sit on his lap.  She was and still is the Siren I longed for -- but yes, when I would hear her -- I would die and be born again.  Really... What planet is she on?  I can only imagine and wonder, is she really real or some collective figment of our imagination?  I am -- a dreamer, a poet, and I was just lucky enough (and many are unlucky in this life) to have found my Muse -- Diana Ross!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MJR and MDfan&#8230; you took my breath away!  I literally held my breath while reading &#8212; because I did not want your critical analyses to end.  If my life has been part of some grand social Matrix &#8212; she has been the most efficient and effective dream of unrequited love &#8212; the ideal love &#8212; according to Hagakure.  She is the icon and iconoclast of homoeroticism, like in &#8220;The Symposium,&#8221; when Socrates invited Alcibiades to sit on his lap.  She was and still is the Siren I longed for &#8212; but yes, when I would hear her &#8212; I would die and be born again.  Really&#8230; What planet is she on?  I can only imagine and wonder, is she really real or some collective figment of our imagination?  I am &#8212; a dreamer, a poet, and I was just lucky enough (and many are unlucky in this life) to have found my Muse &#8212; Diana Ross!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MDfan</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-265376</link>
		<dc:creator>MDfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 18:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-265376</guid>
		<description>Amen, EJR!

I have been so tired of all of the revisionist history regarding the superiority of Florence Ballard&#039;s voice over Diana Ross&#039; voice. There is ample evidence with which one can put that hypothesis to test. Florence Ballard&#039;s voice was loud, strong, and unremarkable. Mary Wilson had a bland, non-melodious alto that has no other place except for in the background or singing a simple jazz ballad.  No other singer in pop music history has had the distinctiveness of Diana&#039;s voice nor the courage to branch out in so many different musical genres. Diana hit number ones with the 60s pop/soul Motown (12 times), with dramatic ballads with heavy orchestration (3 times) with disco numbers (2 times) and with a soulful/gospel tinged classic (Ain&#039;t No Mountain High Enough). The post-Diana Supremes even with the magnificent voice of Jean Terrell lacked the personality and creativity to ever hit number one again and surprisingly only hit the top ten three times in 7 years after Diana left. With Diana as the lead the Supremes had 12 number ones and 20 top ten hits.  The evidence is clear. Diana Ross carried the Supremes. Motown marketed the Supremes with Diana at the helm, but the public bought the records. That fact is almost always conveniently omitted when people allege that Diana received more backing than other Motown artists. Marketing is important, but the quality of the sound is what makes hits.

Diana Ross has sadly been ignored as the pop music icon. In 14 years, she hit number one 18 times. Mariah, Whitney, Madonna, Janet, Barbara, Destiny&#039;s Child, nor the other countless imitators have layed siege to this incredible record even though crossover for Black artists is now the norm and not the exception (as it was in Diana&#039;s heyday).

I&#039;m Still Waiting was a number #1 song in the UK and is a staple of her live performances in Europe. It did not reflect contemporary U.S. stylings but the British fans loved it and made it a classic song. It was released 13 years later and became a top 10 hit. Diana has had 150 international hit singles. Songs that were released here were often not released as singles there and vice versa. Diana Ross has had greater international celebrity than any other superstar and is in a class of her own in terms of longevity. She had a #2 song on the UK pop charts in January 2006 (42 years after her first UK hit). 

Whether you hate or love Diana Ross or not (hate itself speaks to the strength of her star as people rarely take time to form negative emotions against inconsequential figures in music), her career in terms of breadth, depth, and achievement has no direct competitors. 

As an aside, it is always telling to watch the number of posters on Diana Ross topic sites who speak so virulently against her. I am intrigued by personalities that seek information on artists that they do not appreciate. Are you trying to convince others (or yourself!) that the object of your hatred is unworthy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, EJR!</p>
<p>I have been so tired of all of the revisionist history regarding the superiority of Florence Ballard&#8217;s voice over Diana Ross&#8217; voice. There is ample evidence with which one can put that hypothesis to test. Florence Ballard&#8217;s voice was loud, strong, and unremarkable. Mary Wilson had a bland, non-melodious alto that has no other place except for in the background or singing a simple jazz ballad.  No other singer in pop music history has had the distinctiveness of Diana&#8217;s voice nor the courage to branch out in so many different musical genres. Diana hit number ones with the 60s pop/soul Motown (12 times), with dramatic ballads with heavy orchestration (3 times) with disco numbers (2 times) and with a soulful/gospel tinged classic (Ain&#8217;t No Mountain High Enough). The post-Diana Supremes even with the magnificent voice of Jean Terrell lacked the personality and creativity to ever hit number one again and surprisingly only hit the top ten three times in 7 years after Diana left. With Diana as the lead the Supremes had 12 number ones and 20 top ten hits.  The evidence is clear. Diana Ross carried the Supremes. Motown marketed the Supremes with Diana at the helm, but the public bought the records. That fact is almost always conveniently omitted when people allege that Diana received more backing than other Motown artists. Marketing is important, but the quality of the sound is what makes hits.</p>
<p>Diana Ross has sadly been ignored as the pop music icon. In 14 years, she hit number one 18 times. Mariah, Whitney, Madonna, Janet, Barbara, Destiny&#8217;s Child, nor the other countless imitators have layed siege to this incredible record even though crossover for Black artists is now the norm and not the exception (as it was in Diana&#8217;s heyday).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m Still Waiting was a number #1 song in the UK and is a staple of her live performances in Europe. It did not reflect contemporary U.S. stylings but the British fans loved it and made it a classic song. It was released 13 years later and became a top 10 hit. Diana has had 150 international hit singles. Songs that were released here were often not released as singles there and vice versa. Diana Ross has had greater international celebrity than any other superstar and is in a class of her own in terms of longevity. She had a #2 song on the UK pop charts in January 2006 (42 years after her first UK hit). </p>
<p>Whether you hate or love Diana Ross or not (hate itself speaks to the strength of her star as people rarely take time to form negative emotions against inconsequential figures in music), her career in terms of breadth, depth, and achievement has no direct competitors. </p>
<p>As an aside, it is always telling to watch the number of posters on Diana Ross topic sites who speak so virulently against her. I am intrigued by personalities that seek information on artists that they do not appreciate. Are you trying to convince others (or yourself!) that the object of your hatred is unworthy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJR</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-257321</link>
		<dc:creator>EJR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-257321</guid>
		<description>If any of you had any idea what you are talkng about, you&#039;d realize that Ballard&#039;s sister, Maxine, has already written that Diana was the lead singer of the Supremes long before Gordy made it &quot;DE Facto.&quot;

Diana Ross&#039; voice was special and remains special. Ballard&#039;s voice was not special: it was loud and hard. She was a hard sorprano with no personality or stage presence in a recording studio. Mary was a boring voice with a talent for harmonizing. Today with all of this &quot;Revisionalism,&quot; we have a plethora of so-called experts who know nothing but say everything! Open up your ears and listen!

There was talk in the early 60s of Gordy tinkering with the idea of dropping both Ballard and Wilson in favor of Diana as a sololist. He abandoned the idea because of the popularity of the &quot;Girl Groups.&quot; He was never interested in ballard or Wilson and this fact is in the &quot;Public Domain.&quot; Motown put The Supremes on the charts, but Diana&#039;s voice put The Supremes on the map!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If any of you had any idea what you are talkng about, you&#8217;d realize that Ballard&#8217;s sister, Maxine, has already written that Diana was the lead singer of the Supremes long before Gordy made it &#8220;DE Facto.&#8221;</p>
<p>Diana Ross&#8217; voice was special and remains special. Ballard&#8217;s voice was not special: it was loud and hard. She was a hard sorprano with no personality or stage presence in a recording studio. Mary was a boring voice with a talent for harmonizing. Today with all of this &#8220;Revisionalism,&#8221; we have a plethora of so-called experts who know nothing but say everything! Open up your ears and listen!</p>
<p>There was talk in the early 60s of Gordy tinkering with the idea of dropping both Ballard and Wilson in favor of Diana as a sololist. He abandoned the idea because of the popularity of the &#8220;Girl Groups.&#8221; He was never interested in ballard or Wilson and this fact is in the &#8220;Public Domain.&#8221; Motown put The Supremes on the charts, but Diana&#8217;s voice put The Supremes on the map!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brown</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-162701</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 12:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-162701</guid>
		<description>I first knew this song through the remix that was a hit in 1990 - and it may be the comparison that makes this sound better than it actually is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first knew this song through the remix that was a hit in 1990 &#8211; and it may be the comparison that makes this sound better than it actually is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wwolfe</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-154741</link>
		<dc:creator>wwolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-154741</guid>
		<description>Diana Ross didn&#039;t have a conventionally big soul voice.  She did, however, have an instantly recognizable voice, which is always a tremendous asset on the radio.  Even more important, I think, was her ability to sing the emotion of a song while also seeming to wink at it, as well as us in the audience.  This gave a subtle fizzy sensation to the best of her work with the Supremes that may have been the element that set that group&#039;s work apart from the other top Motown acts.  Certainly her work with the Supremes went into serious decline after Holland/Dozier/Holland left Motown, but she&#039;s not alone in that respect: Martha and the Vandellas and the Four Tops if anything went into even steeper declines, both commercially and artistically, without HDH.

It&#039;s true that Diana Ross couldn&#039;t do what Florence Ballard did.  It&#039;s also true that Florence Ballard couldn&#039;t do what Diana Ross did: provide a voice and an image that made the Supremes stand out from the crowd.  And she did more than make them a commercial force, in my opinion: the humor and timing in her delivery of the opening &quot;Oooh&quot; in &quot;Baby Love&quot; was one of the resources that made the Supremes special.  Listening to Ballard&#039;s lead singing, I hear no evidence that she could have supplied that same.  (Also, I&#039;m confused by the statements that Ballard was kicked out of the group when Ross became lead singer.  Ross became sole lead singer sometime in 1963, I believe, but Ballard didn&#039;t leave until roughly 1967 - a departure that I&#039;ve always thought was the result of her own problems with alcohol, more than anything.)

As far as the actual subject of this entry, I&#039;ve never heard the record - or at least I have no memory of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diana Ross didn&#8217;t have a conventionally big soul voice.  She did, however, have an instantly recognizable voice, which is always a tremendous asset on the radio.  Even more important, I think, was her ability to sing the emotion of a song while also seeming to wink at it, as well as us in the audience.  This gave a subtle fizzy sensation to the best of her work with the Supremes that may have been the element that set that group&#8217;s work apart from the other top Motown acts.  Certainly her work with the Supremes went into serious decline after Holland/Dozier/Holland left Motown, but she&#8217;s not alone in that respect: Martha and the Vandellas and the Four Tops if anything went into even steeper declines, both commercially and artistically, without HDH.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that Diana Ross couldn&#8217;t do what Florence Ballard did.  It&#8217;s also true that Florence Ballard couldn&#8217;t do what Diana Ross did: provide a voice and an image that made the Supremes stand out from the crowd.  And she did more than make them a commercial force, in my opinion: the humor and timing in her delivery of the opening &#8220;Oooh&#8221; in &#8220;Baby Love&#8221; was one of the resources that made the Supremes special.  Listening to Ballard&#8217;s lead singing, I hear no evidence that she could have supplied that same.  (Also, I&#8217;m confused by the statements that Ballard was kicked out of the group when Ross became lead singer.  Ross became sole lead singer sometime in 1963, I believe, but Ballard didn&#8217;t leave until roughly 1967 &#8211; a departure that I&#8217;ve always thought was the result of her own problems with alcohol, more than anything.)</p>
<p>As far as the actual subject of this entry, I&#8217;ve never heard the record &#8211; or at least I have no memory of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lena</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-154618</link>
		<dc:creator>Lena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-154618</guid>
		<description>Does Nelson George say anything about Brenda Holloway?  (I guess I should just read the book.)  

Kim Weston was married to Mickey Stevenson (head of A&amp;R at Motown), did a whole album with Marvin Gaye that went nowhere (was it even released? not sure [&quot;It Takes Two&quot; was]) and then left Motown.  They never quite knew what to do with her, or Holloway, I&#039;m guessing, because they never matched what Gordy had in mind for the sound of Motown.  Whereas Ross did - she had a higher, smaller voice that was/is more &#039;pop&#039; than the others (by others I mean Weston, Reeves, Wells) - more &#039;cute&#039; (or &#039;acute&#039; if you like).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Nelson George say anything about Brenda Holloway?  (I guess I should just read the book.)  </p>
<p>Kim Weston was married to Mickey Stevenson (head of A&amp;R at Motown), did a whole album with Marvin Gaye that went nowhere (was it even released? not sure ["It Takes Two" was]) and then left Motown.  They never quite knew what to do with her, or Holloway, I&#8217;m guessing, because they never matched what Gordy had in mind for the sound of Motown.  Whereas Ross did &#8211; she had a higher, smaller voice that was/is more &#8216;pop&#8217; than the others (by others I mean Weston, Reeves, Wells) &#8211; more &#8216;cute&#8217; (or &#8216;acute&#8217; if you like).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcello Carlin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-154188</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcello Carlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-154188</guid>
		<description>Diana Ross ad campaign the year she opened the Harrods sale (early &#039;90s): &quot;Half price bargains throughout the store - on this you can depend and never worry.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diana Ross ad campaign the year she opened the Harrods sale (early &#8217;90s): &#8220;Half price bargains throughout the store &#8211; on this you can depend and never worry.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeorgeB</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-154034</link>
		<dc:creator>GeorgeB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 11:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-154034</guid>
		<description>Kim Weston may well have been exactly as Nelson George describes her, but I find the the way he describes her and the reasons why he does it in those terms distasteful and mean-spirited.  Ok, the term star quality may beg definition - but how?  Can anybody explain why some people have a chutzpah and charm that engages?  Without star quality Muhammad Ali would have been Joe Louis and George Best would have been Tom Finney.  Sure star quality and artistic value aren&#039;t synonymous, but this being popular entertainment it helps if they go hand in hand.  You say potato....&quot;ain&#039;t no mountain high enough&quot; is a soaring contrivance, but Diana Ross pulls it off because she&#039;s a star at the top of her game.  Who else could have got away with it?  She was a lot better than people give her credit for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim Weston may well have been exactly as Nelson George describes her, but I find the the way he describes her and the reasons why he does it in those terms distasteful and mean-spirited.  Ok, the term star quality may beg definition &#8211; but how?  Can anybody explain why some people have a chutzpah and charm that engages?  Without star quality Muhammad Ali would have been Joe Louis and George Best would have been Tom Finney.  Sure star quality and artistic value aren&#8217;t synonymous, but this being popular entertainment it helps if they go hand in hand.  You say potato&#8230;.&#8221;ain&#8217;t no mountain high enough&#8221; is a soaring contrivance, but Diana Ross pulls it off because she&#8217;s a star at the top of her game.  Who else could have got away with it?  She was a lot better than people give her credit for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: intothefireuk</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-153842</link>
		<dc:creator>intothefireuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 09:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-153842</guid>
		<description>I grew up understanding that Diana Ross was essentially the Supremes so I have to take issue with some of the revisionist thinking here that seems to want to discredit her. She has a strong distinctive voice that lends itself particularly well to sentimental ballads but also works well on uptempo pop songs. Luckily for most here she did manage to avoid the more overtly soulful songs (with the possible exception of &#039;River Deep&#039;) which is to her credit. ISW is handled well and works for me although I&#039;m no fan of the spoken section.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I grew up understanding that Diana Ross was essentially the Supremes so I have to take issue with some of the revisionist thinking here that seems to want to discredit her. She has a strong distinctive voice that lends itself particularly well to sentimental ballads but also works well on uptempo pop songs. Luckily for most here she did manage to avoid the more overtly soulful songs (with the possible exception of &#8216;River Deep&#8217;) which is to her credit. ISW is handled well and works for me although I&#8217;m no fan of the spoken section.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Mod</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-153369</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Mod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-153369</guid>
		<description>ERRATA:

1.  Jean Terrell, not Cindy Birdsong, was the lead singer of the so-called &quot;Mary Wilson Supremes.&quot;  Cindy replaced Flo Ballard.

2.  The correct title of the third-mentioned song above is &quot;Everybody&#039;s Got the Right to Love.&quot;


COMMENTS:

1.  Yes, even &quot;Love Hangover,&quot; even though that was surely the best of Ross&#039;s 70s output.  I&#039;ve just downloaded all four of the post-Diana hits I listed.  Having just listened to them, I think they all hold up better than anything Ross did on her own.

2.  &quot;Star quality&quot; is a term that begs definition, more than just some sort of ineffable personal attribute.  I think we could say that Madonna has &quot;star quality,&quot; but at least Madge calls it what it is--ambition.  No one could deny that Diana Ross has always had that.  But &quot;star quality&quot; and artistic quality are not necessarily synonymous--a lack of &quot;star quality&quot; has kept many a fine artist (particularly many female artists) from getting their due.

3.  Kim Weston was indeed a lovely woman.  This does not obviate the fact that was &quot;dark-skinned&quot; and &quot;prone to fat.&quot;  Such attributes do not preclude loveliness, ethnocentric standards of beauty notwithstanding.  Unfortunately for KW and many other black singers, those standards held a lot of power; &lt;i&gt;Dream Girls&lt;/i&gt; makes that issue abundantly clear.

4.  Ross&#039;s &quot;Ain&#039;t No Mountain High Enough&quot; &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; one of the most &quot;cloying and overblown&quot; things to come out of this period, which produced much that could be so described.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ERRATA:</p>
<p>1.  Jean Terrell, not Cindy Birdsong, was the lead singer of the so-called &#8220;Mary Wilson Supremes.&#8221;  Cindy replaced Flo Ballard.</p>
<p>2.  The correct title of the third-mentioned song above is &#8220;Everybody&#8217;s Got the Right to Love.&#8221;</p>
<p>COMMENTS:</p>
<p>1.  Yes, even &#8220;Love Hangover,&#8221; even though that was surely the best of Ross&#8217;s 70s output.  I&#8217;ve just downloaded all four of the post-Diana hits I listed.  Having just listened to them, I think they all hold up better than anything Ross did on her own.</p>
<p>2.  &#8220;Star quality&#8221; is a term that begs definition, more than just some sort of ineffable personal attribute.  I think we could say that Madonna has &#8220;star quality,&#8221; but at least Madge calls it what it is&#8211;ambition.  No one could deny that Diana Ross has always had that.  But &#8220;star quality&#8221; and artistic quality are not necessarily synonymous&#8211;a lack of &#8220;star quality&#8221; has kept many a fine artist (particularly many female artists) from getting their due.</p>
<p>3.  Kim Weston was indeed a lovely woman.  This does not obviate the fact that was &#8220;dark-skinned&#8221; and &#8220;prone to fat.&#8221;  Such attributes do not preclude loveliness, ethnocentric standards of beauty notwithstanding.  Unfortunately for KW and many other black singers, those standards held a lot of power; <i>Dream Girls</i> makes that issue abundantly clear.</p>
<p>4.  Ross&#8217;s &#8220;Ain&#8217;t No Mountain High Enough&#8221; <i>is</i> one of the most &#8220;cloying and overblown&#8221; things to come out of this period, which produced much that could be so described.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeorgeB</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-152959</link>
		<dc:creator>GeorgeB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-152959</guid>
		<description>Right - Nelson George, the guy who described lovely Kim Weston as a &quot;dark-skinned&quot; singer prone to fat.  Diana would have been out front even if she hadn&#039;t been dallying with the boss.  Anyway, why would he choose her from a huge roster of young talent hanging on his every word and over whom he obviously had &quot;droit de seigneur&quot;?  She didn&#039;t have the best voice, but her singing is the most appealing aspect of those Supremes songs - silky, sultry, full of verve.  Plus she wanted it more than the others and was prepared to work for it, happy to become the cross-over artist that Berry Gordy  wanted and needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right &#8211; Nelson George, the guy who described lovely Kim Weston as a &#8220;dark-skinned&#8221; singer prone to fat.  Diana would have been out front even if she hadn&#8217;t been dallying with the boss.  Anyway, why would he choose her from a huge roster of young talent hanging on his every word and over whom he obviously had &#8220;droit de seigneur&#8221;?  She didn&#8217;t have the best voice, but her singing is the most appealing aspect of those Supremes songs &#8211; silky, sultry, full of verve.  Plus she wanted it more than the others and was prepared to work for it, happy to become the cross-over artist that Berry Gordy  wanted and needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcello Carlin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-152951</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcello Carlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/01/diana-ross-im-still-waiting/#comment-152951</guid>
		<description>There are other reasons why Gordy favoured Diana above all others, if you read the Nelson George book...

As with &quot;Tears Of A Clown,&quot; this was an album track released as a single by popular demand (I&#039;m not sure it was ever a single in the States but correct me if I&#039;m wrong) mainly because Tony Blackburn played it ceaselessly on his breakfast show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are other reasons why Gordy favoured Diana above all others, if you read the Nelson George book&#8230;</p>
<p>As with &#8220;Tears Of A Clown,&#8221; this was an album track released as a single by popular demand (I&#8217;m not sure it was ever a single in the States but correct me if I&#8217;m wrong) mainly because Tony Blackburn played it ceaselessly on his breakfast show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

