<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EDISON LIGHTHOUSE - &#8220;Love Grows Where My Rosemary Goes&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: wichita lineman</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-427645</link>
		<dc:creator>wichita lineman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 09:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-427645</guid>
		<description>Except of course it was Tony Macaulay and Barry Mason... well, BM had to make up for The Last Waltz and I Pretend somehow. 

Barry Mason was once an understudy to Albert Finney at the Royal Court. And that's probably how he ended up with a cameo in Saturday Night And Sunday Morning, singing What Do You Want in a pub while Arthur Seaton wins the drinking contest. "You get thirsty working that machine all week".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except of course it was Tony Macaulay and Barry Mason&#8230; well, BM had to make up for The Last Waltz and I Pretend somehow. </p>
<p>Barry Mason was once an understudy to Albert Finney at the Royal Court. And that&#8217;s probably how he ended up with a cameo in Saturday Night And Sunday Morning, singing What Do You Want in a pub while Arthur Seaton wins the drinking contest. &#8220;You get thirsty working that machine all week&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wichita lineman</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-427433</link>
		<dc:creator>wichita lineman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 01:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-427433</guid>
		<description>OK... starts with an instantly identifiable guitar hook, rising strings, chugging bass, intriguing lyric ("clothes are kinda funny, hair is kinda wild and free" - can't you jus picture this beat angel?), repeated chorus with the odd middle eight ("hand holding mine..." which could be a chorus in the hands of lesser mortals). This is a be-a-utifully made record. Think it's simple? Heck, what's not to like? 

I once had a friend who couldn't get into soul because he thought it sounded too put on. His fav singer was Tony Burrows. Obviously this opened him up to insane amounts of abuse from my trendy mates, but from Love Grows alone you can see he had a point (his name was/is Jak Knowles in case anyone knows him, and he had a Glitter Band haircut in 1991 which is heroic as well as a little bit scary). The vocal is entirely believable. 

Weirdly, in the UK Love Grows wasn't followed up at all, with the next Edison Lighthouse 45 (It's Up To You Petula) not appearing for over a year. Anyone got a clue how or why this happened? Or of any other (living) act who didn't bother releasing a follow-up to a number one?

I think that in America, the EL brand continued as Love Grows was followed by Melanie Makes Me Smile (released over here as a Tony Burrows solo 45), almost as good as Love Grows - upbeat bubblegum with a similarly unexpected, eyebrow-twisting (with heartstrings following) downwards tug on the chorus.

This is pop pop popular, as well-crafted and joyous as it gets. It took the combined mights of Macaulay, Cook and Greenaway to make it so irresistible - shame they didn't try more often. A 9 plus for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK&#8230; starts with an instantly identifiable guitar hook, rising strings, chugging bass, intriguing lyric (&#8221;clothes are kinda funny, hair is kinda wild and free&#8221; - can&#8217;t you jus picture this beat angel?), repeated chorus with the odd middle eight (&#8221;hand holding mine&#8230;&#8221; which could be a chorus in the hands of lesser mortals). This is a be-a-utifully made record. Think it&#8217;s simple? Heck, what&#8217;s not to like? </p>
<p>I once had a friend who couldn&#8217;t get into soul because he thought it sounded too put on. His fav singer was Tony Burrows. Obviously this opened him up to insane amounts of abuse from my trendy mates, but from Love Grows alone you can see he had a point (his name was/is Jak Knowles in case anyone knows him, and he had a Glitter Band haircut in 1991 which is heroic as well as a little bit scary). The vocal is entirely believable. </p>
<p>Weirdly, in the UK Love Grows wasn&#8217;t followed up at all, with the next Edison Lighthouse 45 (It&#8217;s Up To You Petula) not appearing for over a year. Anyone got a clue how or why this happened? Or of any other (living) act who didn&#8217;t bother releasing a follow-up to a number one?</p>
<p>I think that in America, the EL brand continued as Love Grows was followed by Melanie Makes Me Smile (released over here as a Tony Burrows solo 45), almost as good as Love Grows - upbeat bubblegum with a similarly unexpected, eyebrow-twisting (with heartstrings following) downwards tug on the chorus.</p>
<p>This is pop pop popular, as well-crafted and joyous as it gets. It took the combined mights of Macaulay, Cook and Greenaway to make it so irresistible - shame they didn&#8217;t try more often. A 9 plus for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-300920</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 16:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-300920</guid>
		<description>I've just bought a CD for 99p - and this track is the opener.

No matter what any fancy analysis says about it and no matter how disparaging people get about it, it's a song that can bring back amazing memories and it needs to be recognised for being one of those tracks that makes you feel good - which is what great music is all about. Nothing else matters!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just bought a CD for 99p - and this track is the opener.</p>
<p>No matter what any fancy analysis says about it and no matter how disparaging people get about it, it&#8217;s a song that can bring back amazing memories and it needs to be recognised for being one of those tracks that makes you feel good - which is what great music is all about. Nothing else matters!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: punctum</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-167994</link>
		<dc:creator>punctum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 08:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-167994</guid>
		<description>Agreed!  I'd have given it an eight!

Tony Macaulay wrote some good 'uns in his time, it has to be said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed!  I&#8217;d have given it an eight!</p>
<p>Tony Macaulay wrote some good &#8216;uns in his time, it has to be said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Edwards</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-166097</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-166097</guid>
		<description>In reply to Tom. Sep 2006

It's actually "Love grows" not "Love goes" and I think it's great. So did 15 Million others!


Stuart Edwards (original guitarist)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to Tom. Sep 2006</p>
<p>It&#8217;s actually &#8220;Love grows&#8221; not &#8220;Love goes&#8221; and I think it&#8217;s great. So did 15 Million others!</p>
<p>Stuart Edwards (original guitarist)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lena</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-158231</link>
		<dc:creator>Lena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-158231</guid>
		<description>Tony Burrows totally makes this song - imagine Tom Jones (or rather, don't) bellowing it - it sounds to me as if he is smiling while he's singing, even good-naturedly winking at points - he's a lucky fella and he knows it.

No idea about Eddystone Lighthouse, but this isn't braindead or cheesy or dross...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony Burrows totally makes this song - imagine Tom Jones (or rather, don&#8217;t) bellowing it - it sounds to me as if he is smiling while he&#8217;s singing, even good-naturedly winking at points - he&#8217;s a lucky fella and he knows it.</p>
<p>No idea about Eddystone Lighthouse, but this isn&#8217;t braindead or cheesy or dross&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Casino</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-64285</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Casino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-64285</guid>
		<description>Agree 100% with the text of Tom's review, and hence feel it deserves something along the lines of a 2 or a 4.  To the extent that I heaped hate on "Sugar, Sugar," this deserves all the same bashing, and "Sugar, Sugar" was at least a more interesting composition.  This really is just the hook, OVER and OVER and OVER.  It's a nice little bit, but I would rather have my dessert overpowered by sugar than by rosemary...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree 100% with the text of Tom&#8217;s review, and hence feel it deserves something along the lines of a 2 or a 4.  To the extent that I heaped hate on &#8220;Sugar, Sugar,&#8221; this deserves all the same bashing, and &#8220;Sugar, Sugar&#8221; was at least a more interesting composition.  This really is just the hook, OVER and OVER and OVER.  It&#8217;s a nice little bit, but I would rather have my dessert overpowered by sugar than by rosemary&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brown</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-39052</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-39052</guid>
		<description>I don't actually remember much about this tune, but in my annoying determination to comment on every entry I'll make a point that crossed my mind re: Rolf - I always quite enjoy the fact that if you try to impose some sort of arbitrary landmark on the charts like the first chart-topper of a decade, the fiftieth anniversary, the Thousandth Number One or whatever, it tends to rebel and come up with something not obviously pivotal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t actually remember much about this tune, but in my annoying determination to comment on every entry I&#8217;ll make a point that crossed my mind re: Rolf - I always quite enjoy the fact that if you try to impose some sort of arbitrary landmark on the charts like the first chart-topper of a decade, the fiftieth anniversary, the Thousandth Number One or whatever, it tends to rebel and come up with something not obviously pivotal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Mod</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38880</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Mod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38880</guid>
		<description>Well, how shall I put this?  This record has long had a place in my "closet collection"--records I just love but don't want my friends to know about.  It's probably one of the very last singles I bought, as by this time I was more interested in album-oriented rock.  But AM radio was inescapable, playing in the background in a lot of offices, so I was still pretty much aware of what was going on in the charts--and anyway, my car radio couldn't pick up FM stations. 

I admit there were some songs that I really enjoyed, but this sort of stuff was really so "uncool" by 1970 that I wouldn't admit it.  Still, "Rosemary" is an example of incredibly well-crafted pop.  Much better, I think, than, "Sugar Sugar" inasmuch as it has a clever rhyme scheme and a great hook, and it actually articulates a sentiment beyond songs with which eight-year-olds can identify (i.e., repeated invocations of sweet confections that, when consumed in excess, can give you a rush in the short term and make you fat in the long).

As to Scott's suggestion--Could it be "There's something about her had holding mine . . . . (???).  But--and this is the English professor speaking--the possessive pronoun "mine" modify a noun within the phrase or sentence, and "hand" is the only one possible.  Of course, sleazy thoughts know no syntax......

BTW, no stork for me.  I'm sorry to admit that I'm a year older than the charts.  What a drag it is getting old!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, how shall I put this?  This record has long had a place in my &#8220;closet collection&#8221;&#8211;records I just love but don&#8217;t want my friends to know about.  It&#8217;s probably one of the very last singles I bought, as by this time I was more interested in album-oriented rock.  But AM radio was inescapable, playing in the background in a lot of offices, so I was still pretty much aware of what was going on in the charts&#8211;and anyway, my car radio couldn&#8217;t pick up FM stations. </p>
<p>I admit there were some songs that I really enjoyed, but this sort of stuff was really so &#8220;uncool&#8221; by 1970 that I wouldn&#8217;t admit it.  Still, &#8220;Rosemary&#8221; is an example of incredibly well-crafted pop.  Much better, I think, than, &#8220;Sugar Sugar&#8221; inasmuch as it has a clever rhyme scheme and a great hook, and it actually articulates a sentiment beyond songs with which eight-year-olds can identify (i.e., repeated invocations of sweet confections that, when consumed in excess, can give you a rush in the short term and make you fat in the long).</p>
<p>As to Scott&#8217;s suggestion&#8211;Could it be &#8220;There&#8217;s something about her had holding mine . . . . (???).  But&#8211;and this is the English professor speaking&#8211;the possessive pronoun &#8220;mine&#8221; modify a noun within the phrase or sentence, and &#8220;hand&#8221; is the only one possible.  Of course, sleazy thoughts know no syntax&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>BTW, no stork for me.  I&#8217;m sorry to admit that I&#8217;m a year older than the charts.  What a drag it is getting old!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosie</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38782</link>
		<dc:creator>rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38782</guid>
		<description>But I am registered and I am logged on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I am registered and I am logged on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38700</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38700</guid>
		<description>sorted - and i've worked out what's going on. unregistered users that aren't logged in can't use html, so it's being stripped out. i might add in a shortcut for all users, something like typing ":stork-girl:" gets automagically changed :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorted - and i&#8217;ve worked out what&#8217;s going on. unregistered users that aren&#8217;t logged in can&#8217;t use html, so it&#8217;s being stripped out. i might add in a shortcut for all users, something like typing &#8220;:stork-girl:&#8221; gets automagically changed :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosie</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38684</link>
		<dc:creator>rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38684</guid>
		<description>Um, I seem to have made rather a hash of trying to put my little stork thingy under David Whitfield's &lt;i&gt;Cara Mia&lt;/i&gt;.  (I know, I know, I'm sorry, a record given a rather generous 2...)

Could somebody sort it out for me please?  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, I seem to have made rather a hash of trying to put my little stork thingy under David Whitfield&#8217;s <i>Cara Mia</i>.  (I know, I know, I&#8217;m sorry, a record given a rather generous 2&#8230;)</p>
<p>Could somebody sort it out for me please?  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcello Carlin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38481</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcello Carlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38481</guid>
		<description>Also he has never entertained at a Tory Party Conference; it was the two girls out of Brotherhood of Man Mk II (of which latter, sadly, much more later)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also he has never entertained at a Tory Party Conference; it was the two girls out of Brotherhood of Man Mk II (of which latter, sadly, much more later)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erithian</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38472</link>
		<dc:creator>Erithian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38472</guid>
		<description>There’s a reference to "the Tony Burrows Fact" in the Robin Carmody essay that Tom linked to above, but to save you looking for it I’ll do it for you (since nobody else has!)  
Tony Burrows, “lead singer” of Edison Lighthouse, was a session singer who had appeared on the Flowerpot Men’s “Let’s Go to San Francisco” in 1967, and in early 1970, while “Love Grows” was number one, he also sang lead on the Pipkins’ “Gimme Dat Ding”, White Plains’ “My Baby Loves Loving” and Brotherhood of Man’s “United We Stand”.  Then one week three of the four records were on Top of the Pops in the same week, and he became notorious for fronting three different bands in the same edition of TOTP.  As the “Glitter Suits and Platform Boots” website relates, at the end of the show he was approached by a staff member and told that he'd been unofficially blacklisted.  He didn’t have another major hit until he sang on “Beach Baby” by First Class some four years later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s a reference to &#8220;the Tony Burrows Fact&#8221; in the Robin Carmody essay that Tom linked to above, but to save you looking for it I’ll do it for you (since nobody else has!)<br />
Tony Burrows, “lead singer” of Edison Lighthouse, was a session singer who had appeared on the Flowerpot Men’s “Let’s Go to San Francisco” in 1967, and in early 1970, while “Love Grows” was number one, he also sang lead on the Pipkins’ “Gimme Dat Ding”, White Plains’ “My Baby Loves Loving” and Brotherhood of Man’s “United We Stand”.  Then one week three of the four records were on Top of the Pops in the same week, and he became notorious for fronting three different bands in the same edition of TOTP.  As the “Glitter Suits and Platform Boots” website relates, at the end of the show he was approached by a staff member and told that he&#8217;d been unofficially blacklisted.  He didn’t have another major hit until he sang on “Beach Baby” by First Class some four years later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcello Carlin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38425</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcello Carlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38425</guid>
		<description>Do you hate fun, or are you just trolling?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you hate fun, or are you just trolling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markgamon</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38421</link>
		<dc:creator>markgamon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38421</guid>
		<description>'rather' unfulfilling? 

I can't believe the late 60s got as bad as this. One piece of irrelevant dim-witted cheesy braindead dross after another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;rather&#8217; unfulfilling? </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe the late 60s got as bad as this. One piece of irrelevant dim-witted cheesy braindead dross after another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcello Carlin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38416</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcello Carlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38416</guid>
		<description>There was also the insinuation at the time that "Rosemary" wasn't referring to a woman, as per "Along Comes Mary" etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was also the insinuation at the time that &#8220;Rosemary&#8221; wasn&#8217;t referring to a woman, as per &#8220;Along Comes Mary&#8221; etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38236</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38236</guid>
		<description>Someone (somewhere, can't remember where) wrote a good review of this record once, interpreting it as a damn fine song about a handjob. (Me, I'd give it an 8 or a 9--the song, I mean.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone (somewhere, can&#8217;t remember where) wrote a good review of this record once, interpreting it as a damn fine song about a handjob. (Me, I&#8217;d give it an 8 or a 9&#8211;the song, I mean.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38233</link>
		<dc:creator>pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38233</guid>
		<description>i think it's a pun on edison (=inventor of the phonograph, lightbulb, modern world) and the eddystone lighthouse, which is what you think it is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think it&#8217;s a pun on edison (=inventor of the phonograph, lightbulb, modern world) and the eddystone lighthouse, which is what you think it is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wwolfe</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38231</link>
		<dc:creator>wwolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38231</guid>
		<description>What is an Edison Lighthouse, anyway?  A cousin of Jefferson Airplane?

The opening of this always makes me think the record was mistakenly played at 33 RPM, instead of 45 RPM, for some reason - it sounds oddly slow, somehow.  It picks up as soon as the vocal comes in, though.

I own a dog-eared collection of "Rolling Stone" magazine reviews bought for a dime at a garage sale, circa 1970.  The review of this song says something to the effect that one way you can tell a bad record is that no matter how many times you hear it, you can only remember the opening line and the hook.  I quoted that to my best friend, who immediately sang the whole song.  An eloquent rebuttal, I thought.  The irony being that I've always liked this record, too.  I guess I was feeling smugly superior that day.

This is kind of a "Vini, vidi, vici" record: it had one goal - Hitsville! - it achieved it, there's not much else to say.  Except it managed to be pleasant in the bargain.  The only two moments that stand out above the generul thrum of pleasantry are the one couplet: "I'm a lucky fella/And I wanna tell her," for its cheeky non'rhyming rhyme, and the counter-vocal at the fade, with Burrows singing, "Love keeps growing every place that she's going" against the repeated hook.

I wonder what Rosemary is doing these days.  I hope the years have been kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is an Edison Lighthouse, anyway?  A cousin of Jefferson Airplane?</p>
<p>The opening of this always makes me think the record was mistakenly played at 33 RPM, instead of 45 RPM, for some reason - it sounds oddly slow, somehow.  It picks up as soon as the vocal comes in, though.</p>
<p>I own a dog-eared collection of &#8220;Rolling Stone&#8221; magazine reviews bought for a dime at a garage sale, circa 1970.  The review of this song says something to the effect that one way you can tell a bad record is that no matter how many times you hear it, you can only remember the opening line and the hook.  I quoted that to my best friend, who immediately sang the whole song.  An eloquent rebuttal, I thought.  The irony being that I&#8217;ve always liked this record, too.  I guess I was feeling smugly superior that day.</p>
<p>This is kind of a &#8220;Vini, vidi, vici&#8221; record: it had one goal - Hitsville! - it achieved it, there&#8217;s not much else to say.  Except it managed to be pleasant in the bargain.  The only two moments that stand out above the generul thrum of pleasantry are the one couplet: &#8220;I&#8217;m a lucky fella/And I wanna tell her,&#8221; for its cheeky non&#8217;rhyming rhyme, and the counter-vocal at the fade, with Burrows singing, &#8220;Love keeps growing every place that she&#8217;s going&#8221; against the repeated hook.</p>
<p>I wonder what Rosemary is doing these days.  I hope the years have been kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcello Carlin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38216</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcello Carlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38216</guid>
		<description>Poor old Tory Burrows, unduly neglected on his sole Popular entry...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor old Tory Burrows, unduly neglected on his sole Popular entry&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38213</link>
		<dc:creator>pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38213</guid>
		<description>you can follow it on the rss feed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can follow it on the rss feed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38212</link>
		<dc:creator>pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38212</guid>
		<description>best comments thread evah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>best comments thread evah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff w</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38207</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38207</guid>
		<description>I have just fuXXored up my stork attempt in Ticket To Ride comments.  Grateful if someone cd sort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just fuXXored up my stork attempt in Ticket To Ride comments.  Grateful if someone cd sort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38206</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2006/09/edison-lighthouse-love-grows-where-my-rosemary-goes/#comment-38206</guid>
		<description>sorry folx - i think Wordpress's typographical niceties got in the way there, correcting my ordinary quotes to curly quotes, which HTML doesn't care for.

anyway i fixed the above sample code to copy as straight quotes – so it should now work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry folx - i think Wordpress&#8217;s typographical niceties got in the way there, correcting my ordinary quotes to curly quotes, which HTML doesn&#8217;t care for.</p>
<p>anyway i fixed the above sample code to copy as straight quotes – so it should now work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
