music TV & Film games books food pubs science sport
Search Random post Register Login E-mail FT rss

August 20th, 2006

the naming of smells

fireflyyears ago brian eno gave a lecture in which he argued that the space occupied by PERFUME is multidimensional in a way that cannot be easily mapped — but this post is about how deodorant companies attempt to do just this, not geometrically it’s true, but by the Empirical Willed Correspondence of WORD and PONG: viz in the picture the name is “TUSK: FIREFLY” and who cannot grasp why eh? You smell like yr HORNY ARSE = ON FIRE!

This question popped into my head bcz for obvious reasons just now i wz unable to resist buying Tusk Firefly’s cousin fragrance = “TUSK: TARKK” — yes yes my friends may wish to AVOID ME for the next (haha) phee-ew days as i test it on the world — but SURELY ITS MIASMA WILL BE SHATTERING in a GOOD WAY!!?

Written by pˆnk s lord sükråt cunctør on Sunday, August 20th, 2006 | 722 views |

Responses

  1. FT's Sarah on August 21st, 2006

    YOU KEEP AWAY.

  2. FT's Pete Baran on August 22nd, 2006

    Is Tusk a foreign version of Lynx - or is that Axe?

    Whatever, it this is not the kind of perfume Eno was talking about!

  3. FT's Stevie on August 26th, 2006

    Where FT leads, the NYT follows.

 

Add a comment

(Register to guarantee your comments don't get marked as spam)