<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Popular &#8216;63</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-473420</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-473420</guid>
		<description>BAH - must fix - think it was easy. i blame the poll plugin. probably.

if i fix it soon, tom you have to promise to tag up all these polls so that we can present them in a page of their own :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BAH - must fix - think it was easy. i blame the poll plugin. probably.</p>
<p>if i fix it soon, tom you have to promise to tag up all these polls so that we can present them in a page of their own :-D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-473380</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-473380</guid>
		<description>As with a lot of the year-end polls, a back-end switch has messed the stats up a lot (though the ranking won't have changed)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with a lot of the year-end polls, a back-end switch has messed the stats up a lot (though the ranking won&#8217;t have changed)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lena</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-473379</link>
		<dc:creator>Lena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-473379</guid>
		<description>I'm surprised that "You'll Never Walk Alone" isn't higher in the poll, esp. after hearing the documentary on it a while back on R2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised that &#8220;You&#8217;ll Never Walk Alone&#8221; isn&#8217;t higher in the poll, esp. after hearing the documentary on it a while back on R2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Smart</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-473375</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Smart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-473375</guid>
		<description>To give this list a sense of upside down context, only one single got to numer 40 on the same charts in 1963, but it's pretty good;

6 Jun  He's The One - Billie Davies - 1 week</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To give this list a sense of upside down context, only one single got to numer 40 on the same charts in 1963, but it&#8217;s pretty good;</p>
<p>6 Jun  He&#8217;s The One - Billie Davies - 1 week</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DV</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-418146</link>
		<dc:creator>DV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-418146</guid>
		<description>I've had to vote for a few of these on the basis of the title, so I gave support to "I Like It!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had to vote for a few of these on the basis of the title, so I gave support to &#8220;I Like It!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Casino</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-411476</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Casino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 02:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-411476</guid>
		<description>Daha!  Makes sense.  I was looking for some sort of sub-page (in the same section as the UK Number Ones reference, maybe); the chronological approach is reasonable enough though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daha!  Makes sense.  I was looking for some sort of sub-page (in the same section as the UK Number Ones reference, maybe); the chronological approach is reasonable enough though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-411109</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 07:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-411109</guid>
		<description>No, it's not meant to - it's because I inserted it chronologically to sit between the end of 63 and the beginning of 64!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it&#8217;s not meant to - it&#8217;s because I inserted it chronologically to sit between the end of 63 and the beginning of 64!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Casino</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410974</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Casino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 02:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410974</guid>
		<description>I need to go back and listen to a bunch of these before I vote.  PS, Tom - this entry isn't showing up in the Popular column...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to go back and listen to a bunch of these before I vote.  PS, Tom - this entry isn&#8217;t showing up in the Popular column&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410906</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410906</guid>
		<description>No love for Ifield I see :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No love for Ifield I see :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410750</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410750</guid>
		<description>I went with the marks I'd handed out when I reviewed the tracks, which were generally on the low side - even the ones I ticked didn't go much over 6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went with the marks I&#8217;d handed out when I reviewed the tracks, which were generally on the low side - even the ones I ticked didn&#8217;t go much over 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinylscot</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410745</link>
		<dc:creator>vinylscot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410745</guid>
		<description>DJ Punctum,

I wholly agree with you regarding DC5, it is a far better version, their first hit IIRC, but I'd still give Brian Poole more than a five!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DJ Punctum,</p>
<p>I wholly agree with you regarding DC5, it is a far better version, their first hit IIRC, but I&#8217;d still give Brian Poole more than a five!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Punctum</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410742</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Punctum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410742</guid>
		<description>The Dave Clark Five's "Do You Love Me?" TOTALLY pwns the Brian Poole one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dave Clark Five&#8217;s &#8220;Do You Love Me?&#8221; TOTALLY pwns the Brian Poole one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinylscot</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410741</link>
		<dc:creator>vinylscot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410741</guid>
		<description>I cast my votes on this earlier today, but decided to wait until now to post my comments, as I had been the first person not to vote for all three Beatles songs, and I wanted to see how that would go down.

A pretty poor year for UK No1s, I would have to say, and it appears the voting bears that out with only the Beatles and Elvis gaining pass marks from more than 50% of the voters. (I'm surprised the Brian Poole and the Tremeloes track isn't more popular - it was always one of my favourites)

The US No1 s list is undeniably more impressive, with the exception of the three which were later covered by assorted Osmond clan members. "Surf City", "Fingerprints", and "My Boyfriend's Back" are all way in front of just about everything from the UK list (possible exception - "She Loves You"). 

Even the surprising foreign language US No1s ("Sukiyaki" and "Dominique") both had memorable tunes, although I couldn't sing along with either!

Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cast my votes on this earlier today, but decided to wait until now to post my comments, as I had been the first person not to vote for all three Beatles songs, and I wanted to see how that would go down.</p>
<p>A pretty poor year for UK No1s, I would have to say, and it appears the voting bears that out with only the Beatles and Elvis gaining pass marks from more than 50% of the voters. (I&#8217;m surprised the Brian Poole and the Tremeloes track isn&#8217;t more popular - it was always one of my favourites)</p>
<p>The US No1 s list is undeniably more impressive, with the exception of the three which were later covered by assorted Osmond clan members. &#8220;Surf City&#8221;, &#8220;Fingerprints&#8221;, and &#8220;My Boyfriend&#8217;s Back&#8221; are all way in front of just about everything from the UK list (possible exception - &#8220;She Loves You&#8221;). </p>
<p>Even the surprising foreign language US No1s (&#8221;Sukiyaki&#8221; and &#8220;Dominique&#8221;) both had memorable tunes, although I couldn&#8217;t sing along with either!</p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410682</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410682</guid>
		<description>Yes I should remember to put a none of the above box on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I should remember to put a none of the above box on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Skidmore</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410666</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Skidmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410666</guid>
		<description>There's not one in the year that I really care about - I wouldn't have given more than 7 to anything there, and could only find three that I am pretty sure would have got over 5 from me. Can't be many years like that. Nothing I like remotely as much as Surf City or He's So Fine in the US list (a 9 and a 9 or 10 there).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s not one in the year that I really care about - I wouldn&#8217;t have given more than 7 to anything there, and could only find three that I am pretty sure would have got over 5 from me. Can&#8217;t be many years like that. Nothing I like remotely as much as Surf City or He&#8217;s So Fine in the US list (a 9 and a 9 or 10 there).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Punctum</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410645</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Punctum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410645</guid>
		<description>I just think it's generally a livelier list and if "Fingertips Pt 2" had made it to number one here I would have given it approximately 48,000 out of ten.

Note for free jazz fans: the Willem Brueker Kollektief do a fabbo version of "Our Day Will Come" on their &lt;i&gt;Live In Berlin&lt;/i&gt; album from '76.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just think it&#8217;s generally a livelier list and if &#8220;Fingertips Pt 2&#8243; had made it to number one here I would have given it approximately 48,000 out of ten.</p>
<p>Note for free jazz fans: the Willem Brueker Kollektief do a fabbo version of &#8220;Our Day Will Come&#8221; on their <i>Live In Berlin</i> album from &#8216;76.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosie</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410639</link>
		<dc:creator>rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410639</guid>
		<description>Marcello @ 4: Ah, Ruby and the Romantics!  Was that really as late as '63?  I seem to remember it being a couple of years earlier, part of my formative experience (ie listening to Radio Luxembourg just because my big sister did.  Anyway, I liked &lt;em&gt;Our Day Will Come&lt;/em&gt; at the time.

That American chart wasn't entirely a different world; many of those records made the British chart too, or at least got significant airplay on Luxy.  And of those that didn't, well, the US is a foreign country after all.  Interesting what a high proportion of the British list is home-grown product. 

Of course, &lt;em&gt;Diamonds&lt;/em&gt; was the first drum'n'bass number one...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcello @ 4: Ah, Ruby and the Romantics!  Was that really as late as &#8216;63?  I seem to remember it being a couple of years earlier, part of my formative experience (ie listening to Radio Luxembourg just because my big sister did.  Anyway, I liked <em>Our Day Will Come</em> at the time.</p>
<p>That American chart wasn&#8217;t entirely a different world; many of those records made the British chart too, or at least got significant airplay on Luxy.  And of those that didn&#8217;t, well, the US is a foreign country after all.  Interesting what a high proportion of the British list is home-grown product. </p>
<p>Of course, <em>Diamonds</em> was the first drum&#8217;n'bass number one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff w</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410633</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410633</guid>
		<description>haha I like your use of a TARDIS to create these polls</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha I like your use of a TARDIS to create these polls</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410586</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410586</guid>
		<description>Success! I have added the extra votes requested.

It's a bit fiddly though so I'm not going to do it again - lesson to voters: VOTE EARLY VOTE OFTEN :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Success! I have added the extra votes requested.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a bit fiddly though so I&#8217;m not going to do it again - lesson to voters: VOTE EARLY VOTE OFTEN :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410581</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410581</guid>
		<description>So it was! I can edit that I think. I wonder if I can also erase your votes MC so you can do it again? I will check.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it was! I can edit that I think. I wonder if I can also erase your votes MC so you can do it again? I will check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Punctum</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410579</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Punctum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410579</guid>
		<description>Oh bugger, I forgot that you're allowed to tick as many as you like and I can't go back and add any more.  Let the record stand, then, that I would have given 6 or more to the first and second Pacemakers ones and the second and third Beatles ones.  Otherwise there are an awful lot of 5s here.

Oh, and a pedant writes: the Billy J Kramer one was "Bad TO Me."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh bugger, I forgot that you&#8217;re allowed to tick as many as you like and I can&#8217;t go back and add any more.  Let the record stand, then, that I would have given 6 or more to the first and second Pacemakers ones and the second and third Beatles ones.  Otherwise there are an awful lot of 5s here.</p>
<p>Oh, and a pedant writes: the Billy J Kramer one was &#8220;Bad TO Me.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Punctum</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410575</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Punctum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410575</guid>
		<description>One of these years where it's clear that a transition is taking place but that news hasn't really reached the top of the charts yet even with the Mersey influx in the second half of the year.  Harder to analyse subjectively as well of course because this is literally just before my time.  But I'll go for "Diamonds" which I think still sounds the most dynamic of these number ones and to offset the (justifiably) many votes which "SLY" and "IWTTYH" will get (one hopes).

Just for comparison purposes, the list of American number ones from the same year is as follows:

Tornados - Telstar
Steve Lawrence - Go Away Little Girl
Rooftop Singers - Walk Right In
Paul &#38; Paula - Hey Paula
Four Seasons - Walk Like A Man
Ruby &#38; the Romantics - Our Day Will Come
Chiffons - He's So Fine
Little Peggy March - I Will Follow Him
Jimmy Soul - If You Wanna Be Happy
Lesley Gore - It's My Party
Kyu Sakamoto - Sukiyaki
The Essex - Easier Said Than Done 
Jan &#38; Dean - Surf City
Tymes - So Much In Love
Little Stevie Wonder - Fingertips Pt 2
Angels - My Boyfriend's Back
Bobby Vinton - Blue Velvet
Jimmy Gilmer &#38; the Fireballs - Sugar Shack
Nino Tempo &#38; April Stevens - Deep Purple
Dale &#38; Grace - I'm Leaving It All Up To You
The Singing Nun - Dominique

I think the term is "a different world."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of these years where it&#8217;s clear that a transition is taking place but that news hasn&#8217;t really reached the top of the charts yet even with the Mersey influx in the second half of the year.  Harder to analyse subjectively as well of course because this is literally just before my time.  But I&#8217;ll go for &#8220;Diamonds&#8221; which I think still sounds the most dynamic of these number ones and to offset the (justifiably) many votes which &#8220;SLY&#8221; and &#8220;IWTTYH&#8221; will get (one hopes).</p>
<p>Just for comparison purposes, the list of American number ones from the same year is as follows:</p>
<p>Tornados - Telstar<br />
Steve Lawrence - Go Away Little Girl<br />
Rooftop Singers - Walk Right In<br />
Paul &amp; Paula - Hey Paula<br />
Four Seasons - Walk Like A Man<br />
Ruby &amp; the Romantics - Our Day Will Come<br />
Chiffons - He&#8217;s So Fine<br />
Little Peggy March - I Will Follow Him<br />
Jimmy Soul - If You Wanna Be Happy<br />
Lesley Gore - It&#8217;s My Party<br />
Kyu Sakamoto - Sukiyaki<br />
The Essex - Easier Said Than Done<br />
Jan &amp; Dean - Surf City<br />
Tymes - So Much In Love<br />
Little Stevie Wonder - Fingertips Pt 2<br />
Angels - My Boyfriend&#8217;s Back<br />
Bobby Vinton - Blue Velvet<br />
Jimmy Gilmer &amp; the Fireballs - Sugar Shack<br />
Nino Tempo &amp; April Stevens - Deep Purple<br />
Dale &amp; Grace - I&#8217;m Leaving It All Up To You<br />
The Singing Nun - Dominique</p>
<p>I think the term is &#8220;a different world.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: intothefireuk</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410573</link>
		<dc:creator>intothefireuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410573</guid>
		<description>Probably the first year I definitely remember listening to &#38; responding to pop music (namely of course The Beatles) and of course the year they were also introduced into most peoples lives. As regards the years number ones - did someone say 'Merseybeat' ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably the first year I definitely remember listening to &amp; responding to pop music (namely of course The Beatles) and of course the year they were also introduced into most peoples lives. As regards the years number ones - did someone say &#8216;Merseybeat&#8217; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosie</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410422</link>
		<dc:creator>rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410422</guid>
		<description>It's a rum old year, isn't it!  The first half dominated by Cliff, the Shadows, and the Shadows spinoffs.  (Apart from &lt;em&gt;Diamonds&lt;/em&gt; they are all, I think, from the soundtrack of the film &lt;em&gt;Summer Holiday&lt;/em&gt; - which I mention because that was the first film I ever saw in a cinema.  The Plaza Birkenhead to be precise.  And then Epsteins boys take over, again and again.  A seismic year, but not a lot in retrospect that really presses my buttons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a rum old year, isn&#8217;t it!  The first half dominated by Cliff, the Shadows, and the Shadows spinoffs.  (Apart from <em>Diamonds</em> they are all, I think, from the soundtrack of the film <em>Summer Holiday</em> - which I mention because that was the first film I ever saw in a cinema.  The Plaza Birkenhead to be precise.  And then Epsteins boys take over, again and again.  A seismic year, but not a lot in retrospect that really presses my buttons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410381</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/12/popular-63/#comment-410381</guid>
		<description>Also feel free to give general comments on the year, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also feel free to give general comments on the year, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
