<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for FreakyTrigger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:40:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on U2 &#8211; &#8220;Desire&#8221; by Iron J</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2010/07/u2-desire/#comment-999446</link>
		<dc:creator>Iron J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=19332#comment-999446</guid>
		<description>&quot;Desire&quot; is a bulky, dust-encrusted &quot;I Will Follow&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Desire&#8221; is a bulky, dust-encrusted &#8220;I Will Follow&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Popular &#8217;77 by AndyPandy</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/07/popular-77/#comment-999095</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyPandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12074#comment-999095</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised they didn&#039;t blank Gary Glitter&#039;s picture out of the countdown it&#039;s getting that ridiculous.

Surprised there&#039;s so much bewilderment about The Brothers it got massive airplay and was one of the few songs that I remember filtering down into our generally uninterested First Year class to the extent that I remember it being sung around the school by someone

Likewise as regards loads of airplay (on Capital anyway) the Andy Fairweather-Low record which I also haven&#039;t heard since - unusual that a vaguely catchy tune with that kind of exposure and on the back of 2 big hits should have been such a flop. Capital saturated their playlists with those 2 too they must have really like him.

The Moments - not a patch on &#039;Girls&#039; probably echoed in the fact that that track (and often elongated with the mixing in of it&#039;s b-side &#039;More Girls&#039;) was the only one of theirs I remember getting played occasionally on the jazz-funk scene as an oldie in the 80s.


Why can&#039;t they have someone in charge of broadcasting these re-runs with a genuine interest in them - AFAIK they&#039;ve got a keen and regular following and are discussed on quite a few websites so the presenting of this should refect their significance.

The way they&#039;re being done makes me think that the people involved have no more realisation of their real value (as social documents etc)than their counterparts in the 1970s would have had and if they had their way they&#039;d probably still be wiping them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised they didn&#8217;t blank Gary Glitter&#8217;s picture out of the countdown it&#8217;s getting that ridiculous.</p>
<p>Surprised there&#8217;s so much bewilderment about The Brothers it got massive airplay and was one of the few songs that I remember filtering down into our generally uninterested First Year class to the extent that I remember it being sung around the school by someone</p>
<p>Likewise as regards loads of airplay (on Capital anyway) the Andy Fairweather-Low record which I also haven&#8217;t heard since &#8211; unusual that a vaguely catchy tune with that kind of exposure and on the back of 2 big hits should have been such a flop. Capital saturated their playlists with those 2 too they must have really like him.</p>
<p>The Moments &#8211; not a patch on &#8216;Girls&#8217; probably echoed in the fact that that track (and often elongated with the mixing in of it&#8217;s b-side &#8216;More Girls&#8217;) was the only one of theirs I remember getting played occasionally on the jazz-funk scene as an oldie in the 80s.</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t they have someone in charge of broadcasting these re-runs with a genuine interest in them &#8211; AFAIK they&#8217;ve got a keen and regular following and are discussed on quite a few websites so the presenting of this should refect their significance.</p>
<p>The way they&#8217;re being done makes me think that the people involved have no more realisation of their real value (as social documents etc)than their counterparts in the 1970s would have had and if they had their way they&#8217;d probably still be wiping them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 100 Songs of All Time by Triffid Farm</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/freaky-triggers-top-100-songs-of-all-time/#comment-998983</link>
		<dc:creator>Triffid Farm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/other-indexes/freaky-triggers-top-100-songs-of-all-time/#comment-998983</guid>
		<description>Leaving the last two unnamed is a shrewd move.  The top place in these countdowns is always obvious once the rest have been eliminated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leaving the last two unnamed is a shrewd move.  The top place in these countdowns is always obvious once the rest have been eliminated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 100 Songs of All Time by jeff w registered</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/freaky-triggers-top-100-songs-of-all-time/#comment-998924</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff w registered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/other-indexes/freaky-triggers-top-100-songs-of-all-time/#comment-998924</guid>
		<description>You were all too drunk to veto B&amp;S ?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You were all too drunk to veto B&amp;S ?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 100 Songs of All Time by admin</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/freaky-triggers-top-100-songs-of-all-time/#comment-998921</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/other-indexes/freaky-triggers-top-100-songs-of-all-time/#comment-998921</guid>
		<description>LOOK, it&#039;s the theme tune to Teachers, a much commented Popular track, and one guarded by a giant ragga bunny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOOK, it&#8217;s the theme tune to Teachers, a much commented Popular track, and one guarded by a giant ragga bunny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Popular &#8217;77 by Mark G</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/07/popular-77/#comment-998818</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12074#comment-998818</guid>
		<description>Belatedly catching up 2 weeks worth:

1) /Slade is what happens when the amount of work they previously did to win (i.e. Dave&#039;s outfits, the production of the song, the song itself) seems like too much bother, so they loosen up a little and end up with no hit/ .. / Donna Summer&#039;s live video not as good as the actual single / .. / That Jesse Green song suffers the BBC orchestra treatment, the single was OK / .. / Silver Convention&#039;s song came from their concept album &quot;The world is a madhouse&quot; about mechanised society and also contains the not-hit-single &quot;I&#039;m not a slot machine&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belatedly catching up 2 weeks worth:</p>
<p>1) /Slade is what happens when the amount of work they previously did to win (i.e. Dave&#8217;s outfits, the production of the song, the song itself) seems like too much bother, so they loosen up a little and end up with no hit/ .. / Donna Summer&#8217;s live video not as good as the actual single / .. / That Jesse Green song suffers the BBC orchestra treatment, the single was OK / .. / Silver Convention&#8217;s song came from their concept album &#8220;The world is a madhouse&#8221; about mechanised society and also contains the not-hit-single &#8220;I&#8217;m not a slot machine&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Popular &#8217;77 by Erithian</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/07/popular-77/#comment-998788</link>
		<dc:creator>Erithian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12074#comment-998788</guid>
		<description>If glam was passé, as shown by Slade and GG last week, the New Seekers were right out of time - although it&#039;s always good to see my first crush Eve again.

Here&#039;s a time capsule - The Brothers on Opportunity Knocks, complete with songwriters Mr and Mrs Greenslade from Exeter, Hughie and the clapometer.  Can&#039;t have been all that WTF though Jim - reached number 8, although they&#039;re true one-hit wonders. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixNJC6uZHVA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If glam was passé, as shown by Slade and GG last week, the New Seekers were right out of time &#8211; although it&#8217;s always good to see my first crush Eve again.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a time capsule &#8211; The Brothers on Opportunity Knocks, complete with songwriters Mr and Mrs Greenslade from Exeter, Hughie and the clapometer.  Can&#8217;t have been all that WTF though Jim &#8211; reached number 8, although they&#8217;re true one-hit wonders. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixNJC6uZHVA" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixNJC6uZHVA&amp;referer=');">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixNJC6uZHVA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Popular &#8217;77 by Erithian</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/07/popular-77/#comment-998775</link>
		<dc:creator>Erithian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12074#comment-998775</guid>
		<description>Listening to The Brian Matthew Story on iPlayer at this moment - a national treasure indeed.  Lovely stories about his friendship with the Beatles and clips of Janice Nicholls and Dusty Springfield.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listening to The Brian Matthew Story on iPlayer at this moment &#8211; a national treasure indeed.  Lovely stories about his friendship with the Beatles and clips of Janice Nicholls and Dusty Springfield.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Popular &#8217;77 by Jimmy the Swede</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/07/popular-77/#comment-998755</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy the Swede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12074#comment-998755</guid>
		<description>There are a host of tributes to Brian Matthew on Radio 2 just now. Richly deserved. And it&#039;s the &quot;obscure stuff&quot; which makes &quot;Sounds of the Sixties&quot; such an enjoyable listen.

I wonder what Jenny and Vicki would make of Napolean XIV...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a host of tributes to Brian Matthew on Radio 2 just now. Richly deserved. And it&#8217;s the &#8220;obscure stuff&#8221; which makes &#8220;Sounds of the Sixties&#8221; such an enjoyable listen.</p>
<p>I wonder what Jenny and Vicki would make of Napolean XIV&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Popular &#8217;77 by punctum</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/07/popular-77/#comment-998725</link>
		<dc:creator>punctum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12074#comment-998725</guid>
		<description>This week&#039;s show was a mess. Ineptly edited, Julie Covington in the top ten and on twice yet not featured, while Barry Biggs and Status Quo come back for the third time.

I think I&#039;ll stick to the late night full-length reruns. But who schedules these useless peak time broadcasts? Who is responsible for editing the life out of these programmes such that anything remotely interesting, or different, or prickly, gets routinely cut (and they&#039;ll do it with the Pistols; you wait and see), leaving only the blandest, least offensive (and therefore to my mind the &lt;i&gt;most&lt;/i&gt; offensive) tripe?

Actually I know the answer. I know who these schedulers and hackers are. They have names like Jenny or Vicki. They hold a 2:2 in media studies from Dudley University. They are unattached. There is nothing in their fridge except nail varnish. They listen to Heart FM for pleasure. They think &lt;i&gt;Bridget Jones&#039; Diary&lt;/i&gt; a truthful social document. They cry to their copy of &lt;i&gt;21&lt;/i&gt;. Their idea of modern philosophy is M. Scott Peck. They are, at root, petrified thirtysomething beings who see the ideal BBC4 viewer as themselves - timid, thwarted, mousey office managers who&#039;ll immediately switch over to &lt;i&gt;Channel 4 News&lt;/i&gt; if they catch a glimpse of &lt;i&gt;Evita&lt;/i&gt; or Gary Glitter or Can - and, like their imagined target audience, instantly see educated, mouthy viewers as the equivalent of the naughty boy at the back of the classroom who needs to be micromanaged and kept in check. The sort of idiot who berates Brian Matthew about &lt;i&gt;Sounds Of The &#039;60s&lt;/i&gt;, complaining that they don&#039;t like all that obscure stuff and all they want to hear are number ones followed by more number ones.

I&#039;d rather they didn&#039;t repeat the shows at all than show them in this bowdlerised form - David Parton as hopeless holiday camp compere, vainly trying to rouse the interest of a disinterested audience, most of whom aren&#039;t even looking at him, is just one instance of what is considered &quot;acceptable.&quot;

And yes, The Brothers won &lt;i&gt;Op Knox&lt;/i&gt;, but they still look like a cruise ship which has had an unfortunate accident with a shipment of orange Quality Street wrappers.

&quot;Must dash now, there&#039;s a new &lt;i&gt;Best Of The Moments&lt;/i&gt; CD out&quot; - you won&#039;t hear that said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s show was a mess. Ineptly edited, Julie Covington in the top ten and on twice yet not featured, while Barry Biggs and Status Quo come back for the third time.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ll stick to the late night full-length reruns. But who schedules these useless peak time broadcasts? Who is responsible for editing the life out of these programmes such that anything remotely interesting, or different, or prickly, gets routinely cut (and they&#8217;ll do it with the Pistols; you wait and see), leaving only the blandest, least offensive (and therefore to my mind the <i>most</i> offensive) tripe?</p>
<p>Actually I know the answer. I know who these schedulers and hackers are. They have names like Jenny or Vicki. They hold a 2:2 in media studies from Dudley University. They are unattached. There is nothing in their fridge except nail varnish. They listen to Heart FM for pleasure. They think <i>Bridget Jones&#8217; Diary</i> a truthful social document. They cry to their copy of <i>21</i>. Their idea of modern philosophy is M. Scott Peck. They are, at root, petrified thirtysomething beings who see the ideal BBC4 viewer as themselves &#8211; timid, thwarted, mousey office managers who&#8217;ll immediately switch over to <i>Channel 4 News</i> if they catch a glimpse of <i>Evita</i> or Gary Glitter or Can &#8211; and, like their imagined target audience, instantly see educated, mouthy viewers as the equivalent of the naughty boy at the back of the classroom who needs to be micromanaged and kept in check. The sort of idiot who berates Brian Matthew about <i>Sounds Of The &#8217;60s</i>, complaining that they don&#8217;t like all that obscure stuff and all they want to hear are number ones followed by more number ones.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d rather they didn&#8217;t repeat the shows at all than show them in this bowdlerised form &#8211; David Parton as hopeless holiday camp compere, vainly trying to rouse the interest of a disinterested audience, most of whom aren&#8217;t even looking at him, is just one instance of what is considered &#8220;acceptable.&#8221;</p>
<p>And yes, The Brothers won <i>Op Knox</i>, but they still look like a cruise ship which has had an unfortunate accident with a shipment of orange Quality Street wrappers.</p>
<p>&#8220;Must dash now, there&#8217;s a new <i>Best Of The Moments</i> CD out&#8221; &#8211; you won&#8217;t hear that said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Popular &#8217;77 by Jimmy the Swede</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2008/07/popular-77/#comment-998702</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy the Swede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=12074#comment-998702</guid>
		<description>This week&#039;s show was a rather annoying affair. Tracks were nearly all cut short, some ridiculously so. And the Gals kept their kit on. Tony Blackburn was the referee.

The Brothers - I had no idea about this at all. It was one of those WTF? moments. Erithian suggested they may have been Op Knox winners. Neither of us cared.

David Parton - I think this one&#039;s been covered. The suggestion that it provided an opportunity to bag this track as a single (by anyone who sounded remotely like SW) is undoubtedly correct. You only have to look at Parton&#039;s chart position to understand that. He himself looks like a cock.

The Eagles&#039; &quot;New Kid In Town&quot; - And Legs. Only there are no legs at all. The Gals frustrate their panting, salivating admirers by full-dressing up as gangters&#039; molls from the twenties (I think) and then the performance is brutely cut half-way through in order to give way to...

Fatty Briggs! - Look! This bugger can&#039;t f&#039;king sing, okay? The man is squeaky and tone deaf. And check out the pink outfit three sizes too small for him. Small wonder this is a song about loneliness. Jesus! Nice number, though.

Quo - Introduced by Tony and fetching young woman plucked out of the audience. Quo are just Quo.

Mr Big - Highlight of the night for me. A great little record, this. Well done!

Andy Fairweather-Low - Well, okay but wallpaper music really. What audience was he targeting?

Moments - On screen to sing &quot;Jack In His Box&quot;. And they&#039;re also decked out in pink! Was it that year&#039;s colour? Good song and a good performance, which Big Bazza could only dream about. I personally preferred &quot;Dolly My Love&quot;, though.

New Seekers - Lovely, wholesome Eve bashes out another old time sing-a-long before being savagely cut. An outrage!

David Soul - We say goodbye to this. But it was a good number one. And Hutch might well be back.

Titles to &quot;Car Wash&quot;.

This was a strange show. Everything in a rush. And certainly short-changed on our Mucky Sue fix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s show was a rather annoying affair. Tracks were nearly all cut short, some ridiculously so. And the Gals kept their kit on. Tony Blackburn was the referee.</p>
<p>The Brothers &#8211; I had no idea about this at all. It was one of those WTF? moments. Erithian suggested they may have been Op Knox winners. Neither of us cared.</p>
<p>David Parton &#8211; I think this one&#8217;s been covered. The suggestion that it provided an opportunity to bag this track as a single (by anyone who sounded remotely like SW) is undoubtedly correct. You only have to look at Parton&#8217;s chart position to understand that. He himself looks like a cock.</p>
<p>The Eagles&#8217; &#8220;New Kid In Town&#8221; &#8211; And Legs. Only there are no legs at all. The Gals frustrate their panting, salivating admirers by full-dressing up as gangters&#8217; molls from the twenties (I think) and then the performance is brutely cut half-way through in order to give way to&#8230;</p>
<p>Fatty Briggs! &#8211; Look! This bugger can&#8217;t f&#8217;king sing, okay? The man is squeaky and tone deaf. And check out the pink outfit three sizes too small for him. Small wonder this is a song about loneliness. Jesus! Nice number, though.</p>
<p>Quo &#8211; Introduced by Tony and fetching young woman plucked out of the audience. Quo are just Quo.</p>
<p>Mr Big &#8211; Highlight of the night for me. A great little record, this. Well done!</p>
<p>Andy Fairweather-Low &#8211; Well, okay but wallpaper music really. What audience was he targeting?</p>
<p>Moments &#8211; On screen to sing &#8220;Jack In His Box&#8221;. And they&#8217;re also decked out in pink! Was it that year&#8217;s colour? Good song and a good performance, which Big Bazza could only dream about. I personally preferred &#8220;Dolly My Love&#8221;, though.</p>
<p>New Seekers &#8211; Lovely, wholesome Eve bashes out another old time sing-a-long before being savagely cut. An outrage!</p>
<p>David Soul &#8211; We say goodbye to this. But it was a good number one. And Hutch might well be back.</p>
<p>Titles to &#8220;Car Wash&#8221;.</p>
<p>This was a strange show. Everything in a rush. And certainly short-changed on our Mucky Sue fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SONNY AND CHER &#8211; &#8220;I Got You Babe&#8221; by lonepilgrim</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/03/sonny-and-cher-i-got-you-babe/#comment-998505</link>
		<dc:creator>lonepilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2005/03/sonny-and-cher-i-got-you-babe/#comment-998505</guid>
		<description>This also got to Number 1 in the USA, as noted here:

http://nohardchords.wordpress.com/2012/02/02/142-sonny-and-cher-i-got-you-babe/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This also got to Number 1 in the USA, as noted here:</p>
<p><a href="http://nohardchords.wordpress.com/2012/02/02/142-sonny-and-cher-i-got-you-babe/" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/nohardchords.wordpress.com/2012/02/02/142-sonny-and-cher-i-got-you-babe/?referer=');">http://nohardchords.wordpress.com/2012/02/02/142-sonny-and-cher-i-got-you-babe/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SHAGGY &#8211; &#8220;Oh Carolina&#8221; by Richard Buckley</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2012/01/shaggy-oh-carolina/#comment-998207</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Buckley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=22677#comment-998207</guid>
		<description>I suggest a further honourable mention to add to Punctum&#039;s short list at #20 of rave/ragga crossover anthems - Leila K&#039;s stupendous &#039;Open Sesame&#039; which made the UK top 40 in early 93 after European success the previous year.  I absolutely adored that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest a further honourable mention to add to Punctum&#8217;s short list at #20 of rave/ragga crossover anthems &#8211; Leila K&#8217;s stupendous &#8216;Open Sesame&#8217; which made the UK top 40 in early 93 after European success the previous year.  I absolutely adored that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SHAGGY &#8211; &#8220;Oh Carolina&#8221; by Erithian</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2012/01/shaggy-oh-carolina/#comment-998204</link>
		<dc:creator>Erithian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=22677#comment-998204</guid>
		<description>As long as we mention Shaggy occasionally (without reference to Fred, Daphne and Velma).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as we mention Shaggy occasionally (without reference to Fred, Daphne and Velma).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SHAGGY &#8211; &#8220;Oh Carolina&#8221; by Jimmy the Swede</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2012/01/shaggy-oh-carolina/#comment-998180</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy the Swede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=22677#comment-998180</guid>
		<description>Well, Erithian, as I mentioned previously on Popular (I can&#039;t recall where), I once penned a thesis on: &quot;The Tragedy Which Is Captain Black&quot;. Honest to God, the story of this poor tormented guy is a harrowing tale of Greek proportions. I always write freehand and it was a mercy that I wasn&#039;t in The Beachy Head Tavern at the time...

How long do you think we can go on like this before Management cuts us off?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Erithian, as I mentioned previously on Popular (I can&#8217;t recall where), I once penned a thesis on: &#8220;The Tragedy Which Is Captain Black&#8221;. Honest to God, the story of this poor tormented guy is a harrowing tale of Greek proportions. I always write freehand and it was a mercy that I wasn&#8217;t in The Beachy Head Tavern at the time&#8230;</p>
<p>How long do you think we can go on like this before Management cuts us off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SHAGGY &#8211; &#8220;Oh Carolina&#8221; by Erithian</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2012/01/shaggy-oh-carolina/#comment-998161</link>
		<dc:creator>Erithian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=22677#comment-998161</guid>
		<description>I think they&#039;ve finally found our level Jimbo!

Didn&#039;t someone do a sort-of scientific paper on the optimum time Coyote (or Bugs or whoever) can stay suspended in the air before they realise the cliff is no longer there?

And I suspect (#50) that &quot;Kill Dem Batty Man&quot; is a gag somebody inserted in the Wiki article on Shabba that has been adopted in sites that lift wholesale from Wiki.  To quote a cartoon in this week&#039;s Private Eye: (schoolteacher to pupil) &quot;This homework is incisive, original and full of accurate facts... Wikipedia must be down again&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they&#8217;ve finally found our level Jimbo!</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t someone do a sort-of scientific paper on the optimum time Coyote (or Bugs or whoever) can stay suspended in the air before they realise the cliff is no longer there?</p>
<p>And I suspect (#50) that &#8220;Kill Dem Batty Man&#8221; is a gag somebody inserted in the Wiki article on Shabba that has been adopted in sites that lift wholesale from Wiki.  To quote a cartoon in this week&#8217;s Private Eye: (schoolteacher to pupil) &#8220;This homework is incisive, original and full of accurate facts&#8230; Wikipedia must be down again&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SHAGGY &#8211; &#8220;Oh Carolina&#8221; by Jimmy the Swede</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2012/01/shaggy-oh-carolina/#comment-998155</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy the Swede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=22677#comment-998155</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m bloody loving all this!

Perhaps the Advanced Level study group can similarly consider Wile E Coyote&#039;s pursuit of The Roadrunner. Wile E is neither fiendish nor clever and powerful. Basically he&#039;s a lunatic and a fuckwit. It&#039;s clear that satifaction of appetite has nothing to do with what he&#039;s doing or he would simply retreat to KFC and be done with it. Coyote instead invests in a succession of ACME contraptions, all of which fail. The capture of the Roadrunner thus itself becomes a means to an end. As Dostoyevsky argues in &quot;Crime and Punishment&quot;...

(Continued on P.94)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m bloody loving all this!</p>
<p>Perhaps the Advanced Level study group can similarly consider Wile E Coyote&#8217;s pursuit of The Roadrunner. Wile E is neither fiendish nor clever and powerful. Basically he&#8217;s a lunatic and a fuckwit. It&#8217;s clear that satifaction of appetite has nothing to do with what he&#8217;s doing or he would simply retreat to KFC and be done with it. Coyote instead invests in a succession of ACME contraptions, all of which fail. The capture of the Roadrunner thus itself becomes a means to an end. As Dostoyevsky argues in &#8220;Crime and Punishment&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>(Continued on P.94)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SHAGGY &#8211; &#8220;Oh Carolina&#8221; by swanstep</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2012/01/shaggy-oh-carolina/#comment-998128</link>
		<dc:creator>swanstep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=22677#comment-998128</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Dastardly’s car is so much faster than the others that he can get ahead and set booby traps for them all, so if he didn’t do that he’d win every time.&lt;/i&gt;
Snicker, snicker, snicker (Muttley&#039;s laugh). 
A version of this problem infects a lot of &#039;fiendishly clever and powerful villain&#039; plots. If the villain were smart enough and powerful enough to have every long-shot possibility covered (as it turns out they do) then they would never have done what they actually did earlier (indeed conceivably they would have no use/need for the MacGuffin they&#039;re supposed to be after). A sub-species of this is the &#039;70s paranoia thriller where fiendishly powerful corporations keep on killing any reporters etc. who get the slightest hint of what&#039;s going on with them. It&#039;s always true in such thrillers that all the Parallax Corp (or whatever it might be) had to do was just ignore/deny any half-baked ideas/allegations some nobody might have about them, but instead they proceed to kill all such nobodies, which inevitably draws lots of attention...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Dastardly’s car is so much faster than the others that he can get ahead and set booby traps for them all, so if he didn’t do that he’d win every time.</i><br />
Snicker, snicker, snicker (Muttley&#8217;s laugh).<br />
A version of this problem infects a lot of &#8216;fiendishly clever and powerful villain&#8217; plots. If the villain were smart enough and powerful enough to have every long-shot possibility covered (as it turns out they do) then they would never have done what they actually did earlier (indeed conceivably they would have no use/need for the MacGuffin they&#8217;re supposed to be after). A sub-species of this is the &#8217;70s paranoia thriller where fiendishly powerful corporations keep on killing any reporters etc. who get the slightest hint of what&#8217;s going on with them. It&#8217;s always true in such thrillers that all the Parallax Corp (or whatever it might be) had to do was just ignore/deny any half-baked ideas/allegations some nobody might have about them, but instead they proceed to kill all such nobodies, which inevitably draws lots of attention&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SHAGGY &#8211; &#8220;Oh Carolina&#8221; by thefatgit</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2012/01/shaggy-oh-carolina/#comment-998062</link>
		<dc:creator>thefatgit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=22677#comment-998062</guid>
		<description>There might not be a Shabba Ranks biography, but there is a Shaggy book called &quot;Shaggy: Dogamuffin Style&quot; by Micah Locilento.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There might not be a Shabba Ranks biography, but there is a Shaggy book called &#8220;Shaggy: Dogamuffin Style&#8221; by Micah Locilento.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SHAGGY &#8211; &#8220;Oh Carolina&#8221; by Jimmy the Swede</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2012/01/shaggy-oh-carolina/#comment-998041</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy the Swede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=22677#comment-998041</guid>
		<description># 49 - Hair Bear is Don King, obv.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 49 &#8211; Hair Bear is Don King, obv.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SHAGGY &#8211; &#8220;Oh Carolina&#8221; by Izzy</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2012/01/shaggy-oh-carolina/#comment-998037</link>
		<dc:creator>Izzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=22677#comment-998037</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t remember the Jamaican influence as anything more than a sideshow, myself.  Certainly there were a few hits; but as a movement, bookended by rave and (I suppose) britpop, it never really happened.

&#039;Informer&#039; is an incredible record, I&#039;m delighted to have had it brought to my intention.  I can&#039;t get my head round how such a thing comes to be - his wikipedia biography barely explains it.

Speaking of wikipedia, it tells me Shabba&#039;s 2010 autobiography was titled &#039;Kill Dem Batty Man&#039;, suggesting a charming lack of repentance.  There are no independent references to the tome elsewhere on the net, though, so I suspect this is untrue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t remember the Jamaican influence as anything more than a sideshow, myself.  Certainly there were a few hits; but as a movement, bookended by rave and (I suppose) britpop, it never really happened.</p>
<p>&#8216;Informer&#8217; is an incredible record, I&#8217;m delighted to have had it brought to my intention.  I can&#8217;t get my head round how such a thing comes to be &#8211; his wikipedia biography barely explains it.</p>
<p>Speaking of wikipedia, it tells me Shabba&#8217;s 2010 autobiography was titled &#8216;Kill Dem Batty Man&#8217;, suggesting a charming lack of repentance.  There are no independent references to the tome elsewhere on the net, though, so I suspect this is untrue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SHAGGY &#8211; &#8220;Oh Carolina&#8221; by Tim</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2012/01/shaggy-oh-carolina/#comment-998027</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=22677#comment-998027</guid>
		<description>Other cartoon-reggae crossovers include Scoobie, Top Cat and a whole sub-genre of ragga named after Barney and Betty Rubble&#039;s daughter Bam-Bam. I bet there are more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other cartoon-reggae crossovers include Scoobie, Top Cat and a whole sub-genre of ragga named after Barney and Betty Rubble&#8217;s daughter Bam-Bam. I bet there are more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SHAGGY &#8211; &#8220;Oh Carolina&#8221; by Erithian</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2012/01/shaggy-oh-carolina/#comment-998021</link>
		<dc:creator>Erithian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=22677#comment-998021</guid>
		<description>Even Wiki points out that Dastardly’s car is so much faster than the others that he can get ahead and set booby traps for them all, so if he didn’t do that he’d win every time.  Would have killed off the show though.

As we noted on the Readers’ Poll thread at New Year, Klunk from “Stop The Pigeon” = Jessie J on the Christmas TOTP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even Wiki points out that Dastardly’s car is so much faster than the others that he can get ahead and set booby traps for them all, so if he didn’t do that he’d win every time.  Would have killed off the show though.</p>
<p>As we noted on the Readers’ Poll thread at New Year, Klunk from “Stop The Pigeon” = Jessie J on the Christmas TOTP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SHAGGY &#8211; &#8220;Oh Carolina&#8221; by Jimmy the Swede</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2012/01/shaggy-oh-carolina/#comment-998011</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy the Swede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=22677#comment-998011</guid>
		<description>Actually, Mark, my guess would be that they would keep him in, since he always gets turned over in the end and thus never has a podium finish (or in TOTP parlance, a record in the top three).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Mark, my guess would be that they would keep him in, since he always gets turned over in the end and thus never has a podium finish (or in TOTP parlance, a record in the top three).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SHAGGY &#8211; &#8220;Oh Carolina&#8221; by Mark G</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular/2012/01/shaggy-oh-carolina/#comment-998007</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/?p=22677#comment-998007</guid>
		<description>What would an episode of Wacky Races look like with Dick Dastardly edited out though?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would an episode of Wacky Races look like with Dick Dastardly edited out though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

