<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FreakyTrigger &#187; DJP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/author/djp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk</link>
	<description>Lollards in the high church of low culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:49:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Music Sounds Better With Evil Corporations</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2005/03/music-sounds-better-with-evil-corporations/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2005/03/music-sounds-better-with-evil-corporations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2005/03/music-sounds-better-with-evil-corporations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Music Sounds Better With Evil Corporations Last night I walked past two major record stores in Boston. As I crossed in front of the Virgin Megastore, they were playing &#8220;Hombre&#8221; by M.I.A. When I went into Newbury Comics, they were playing Bjork&#8217;s singles in one half of the store and some anonymous-sounding, boring guitar band [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Music Sounds Better With Evil Corporations</strong></p>
<p>Last night I walked past two major record stores in Boston. As I crossed in front of the Virgin Megastore, they were playing &#8220;Hombre&#8221; by M.I.A. When I went into Newbury Comics, they were playing Bjork&#8217;s singles in one half of the store and some anonymous-sounding, boring guitar band in the other half. At that moment, I desperately wished that Virgin sold comic books because it was blatantly obvious that Newbury Comics had jumped the shark and put itself in a little musical cul-de-sac that refused to acknowledge music after 1997 and I didn&#8217;t really want to be in that place; I wanted to run through 2005 with M.I.A. on one arm and Stush on the other. </p>
<p>I found it to be a relatively jarring moment because I&#8217;ve been retreating without complaint into musical nostalgia over the past couple of years; I&#8217;ve felt little-to-no desire to investigate musical scenes any deeper than what gets presented on MTV and the local ClearChannel radio stations (outside of keeping an eye out for musical endeavors pursued by people I&#8217;ve met online), plus I&#8217;ve felt almost no desire to buy/download anything that I either haven&#8217;t heard before or wasn&#8217;t done by an established favorite. Newbury Comics, which (to me) used to be the Boston bastion of forward-thinking tastemaking, seems to have retreated into this shell as well, pandering to the most conservative musical instincts in my body, but as I walked past Virgin and heard those braying, discordant &#8220;HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEY&#8221;s ringing out over the street, I felt, I don&#8217;t know, <em>alive</em>, like I was about to be transported naked onto a dancefloor with 8 million clones of my wife begging me to dance them into orgasm. Entering Newbury Comics felt like turning my back on a shiny, candy-coated version of <strong>TEH FUTUR</strong>. Almost every fiber of my being wanted to run into the street, dash over to Virgin and spend my entire paycheck on new imports, like I did in my early 20s. It was a crystallized moment of pure aural-consumer desire the likes of which I hadn&#8217;t felt since 2000. Instead, I wandered to the counter with my X-Men book and a copy of <em>Actually</em> and wistfully thought back on the days when I wasn&#8217;t old.</p>
<p>I guess it isn&#8217;t a big surprise that the big conglomerate would be better at pushing &#8220;CONSUME!&#8221; buttons than the &#8220;plucky-local-kid&#8221; conglomerate that still thinks chrome-plated Dr. Martens are the shit, but it&#8217;s been YEARS since I&#8217;ve felt that overwhelming need to buy music. Even though I&#8217;ll probably stay in my hermetic navel-gazing bubble for the time being, it&#8217;s nice to know there&#8217;s a manic monster in my heart that would like to make a gigantic grime-and-reggaeton jock strap and give me the world&#8217;s funkiest wedgie with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2005/03/music-sounds-better-with-evil-corporations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WHO REVIEWS: #5, #6, #7</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/wedge/2004/08/who-reviews-5-6-7/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/wedge/2004/08/who-reviews-5-6-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2004 02:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/wedge/2004/08/who-reviews-5-6-7/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cat&#8217;s Cradle: Time&#8217;s Crucible &#8211; Marc Platt (7/10) (TARDIS crew: 7th, Ace; VILLAIN: The Process) Cat&#8217;s Cradle: Warhead &#8211; Andrew Cartmel (7/10) (TARDIS crew: 7th, Ace; VILLAIN: Butler Institute, Mathew O&#8217;Hara) Cat&#8217;s Cradle: Witch Mark &#8211; Andrew Hunt (2/10) (TARDIS crew: 7th, Ace; VILLAIN: Some random Welsh gits) The first four New Adventurers gave Whovians [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em><a href="http://www.timelash.com/tardis/display.asp?db=na&#038;id=5" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.timelash.com/tardis/display.asp?db=na_038_id=5&amp;referer=');">Cat&#8217;s Cradle: Time&#8217;s Crucible</a></em> &#8211; Marc Platt</strong> (7/10)<br />
(TARDIS crew: 7th, Ace; VILLAIN: The Process)</p>
<p><strong><em><a href="http://www.timelash.com/tardis/display.asp?db=na&#038;id=6" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.timelash.com/tardis/display.asp?db=na_038_id=6&amp;referer=');">Cat&#8217;s Cradle: Warhead</a></em> &#8211; Andrew Cartmel</strong> (7/10)<br />
(TARDIS crew: 7th, Ace; VILLAIN: Butler Institute, Mathew O&#8217;Hara)</p>
<p><strong><em><a href="http://www.timelash.com/tardis/display.asp?db=na&#038;id=7" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.timelash.com/tardis/display.asp?db=na_038_id=7&amp;referer=');">Cat&#8217;s Cradle: Witch Mark</a></em> &#8211; Andrew Hunt</strong> (2/10)<br />
(TARDIS crew: 7th, Ace; VILLAIN: Some random Welsh gits)</p>
<p>The first four New Adventurers gave Whovians the epic Timewyrm, chasing all around the galaxy and even into the Doctor&#8217;s mind. The next three books all bear the &#8220;Cat&#8217;s Cradle&#8221; moniker and was poised to be another multi-book saga.</p>
<p>So what went wrong?</p>
<p>The three books have absolutely nothing to do with each other. <em>Time&#8217;s Crucible</em> is a base-under-siege pastiche mixed in with some startling revelations about ancient Gallifrey. <em>Warhead</em> is a near-future ecoterror story. <em>Witch Mark</em> is a parallel universe exercise in fairyland fuckwittery. The linking device is a silver cat that represents the TARDIS but only actually impacts the plot of <em>Time&#8217;s Crucible</em>. Events in <em>Time&#8217;s Crucible</em> have a negligible impact on the setup of <em>Witch Mark</em>, but <em>Warhead</em> could have occurred at anytime without causing any real continuity hiccups. As an overarching epic, these three books fail completely.</p>
<p>So why publish them with <em>Cat&#8217;s Cradle</em> in the titles? I can understand not wanting to do another &#8220;Doctor and Ace hunt down a threat&#8221; multipart story; variety is the spice of life, after all. However, there isn&#8217;t even a thematic link or a &#8220;the events of one story lead into another&#8221; setup going on; I have no idea what Peter Darvill-Evans was thinking when he tried to shoehorn these books together (beyond &#8220;HAHA STUPID FANBOYS I TAKE YOUR CASH AND FLEE LIKE WIND&#8221;).</p>
<p>Individually, two of the books work very well. <em>Time&#8217;s Crucible</em> sets a deeply claustrophobic mood by stranding Ace in a nightmarish, time-ravaged landscape with no Doctor, no TARDIS, a bunch of amnesiac explorers from Gallifrey&#8217;s history called Phazels and a gigantic, disgusting datavore that calls itself The Process. Platt does an excellent job of revealing twist after twist, springing revelations about where the action is taking place, why The Process is making the Phazels look for the Future, and where the Process&#8217;s creepy humanoid guard with the insect heads actually came from, all while meshing in the Ancient Gallifrey plot that explains the emergence of rationalism and time travel and gives some startling details about pre-Time Lord life. <em>Warhead</em> goes for a different type of harrowing, evoking an Earth not too far removed from our reality but full of neat little future ideas, like the holographic answering machine. Cartmel&#8217;s Doctor is firmly in chessmaster mode, maneuvering character after character in a grand scheme to stop the schemes of a severely disturbed businessman and his plan to cheat death by forcibly downloading humanity into a supercomputer. The most interesting part of the story revolves around Justine, a neo-Luddite teen obsessed with nature and witchcraft, and Vincent, the Whoniverse&#8217;s most fascinating psychokinetic who channels emotions into fearsome mental powers.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s good old <em>Witch Mark</em>. Poor, sad, horrifyingly bad <em>Witch Mark</em>. The book is packed with stereotype after stereotype, what with the stranger-hating Welsh farmers, the two American backpackers that seem to have actually come from 50s London, the Peter-Davison-in-&#8221;All Creatures Great And Small&#8221;-esque vet, the helpful old couple in the inn, the surly humans in the fairy realm, the wise, gentle unicorns, the staid trolls, etc etc etc. The vestiges of a great plot lurk in this mess (the fairy realm is collapsing and the inhabitants there, along with the Welshmen, are attempting to infiltrate Earth, creating conflict both on Earth between the UK and the transplants and between the fairyland humans and the fairy creatures, all exacerbated by witches using the situation for their own gain) but the book seem to be actively conspiring to hide this from you. Glaring plot holes fly all over the place, including one particular howler that isn&#8217;t resolved for another 49 books. This was the last book I needed to complete my New Adventures collection; I still have conflicting emotions about having spent money for this nonsense. </p>
<p>In the end, we have two very good books and one shockingly bad book, all more pessimistic in tone and setting than the previous four novels. Apparently, adults don&#8217;t like fun very much (and it only gets grimmer from here).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/wedge/2004/08/who-reviews-5-6-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WHO REVIEWS: #4</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/wedge/2004/08/who-reviews-4/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/wedge/2004/08/who-reviews-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2004 04:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/wedge/2004/08/who-reviews-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Timewyrm: Revelation &#8211; Paul Cornell (8/10) (TARDIS crew: 7th, Ace; VILLAIN: The Timewyrm, Chad Boyle, Rupert Hemmings) (Okay, I was slacking for a little bit in my writing; you all have my heartfelt apologies. The hiatus has given me a chance to get ahead in my reading, though. Expect a few more of these next [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em><a href="http://www.timelash.com/tardis/display.asp?db=na&#038;id=4" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.timelash.com/tardis/display.asp?db=na_038_id=4&amp;referer=');">Timewyrm: Revelation</a></em> &#8211; Paul Cornell</strong> (8/10)<br />
(TARDIS crew: 7th, Ace; VILLAIN: The Timewyrm, Chad Boyle, Rupert Hemmings)</p>
<p>(Okay, I was slacking for a little bit in my writing; you all have my heartfelt apologies. The hiatus has given me a chance to get ahead in my reading, though. Expect a few more of these next week.)</p>
<p>Paul Cornell established himself early on as one of the darlings of the New Adventures by writing an immensely entertaining novel that was really the first one to hint at the promise stated by editor Peter Darvill-Evans in his forward for <em>Timewyrm: Genesys</em>. <em>Timewyrm: Revelation</em> veers in location from the English countryside to the moon to surreal landscapes directly out of a Timelord&#8217;s fever dream. Cornell uses continuity as bludgeon, battering Ace left and right through half-remembered scenarios populated with previous incarnations of the Doctor. It&#8217;s a low-budget director&#8217;s worst nightmare; you really can&#8217;t imagine this story on the small screen.</p>
<p>Cornell is also the first novelist of the line to trade on the darker side of the seventh Doctor. The previous three books put more emphasis on the season 24 &#8220;jolly bumbler&#8221; version of the Seventh Doctor; the scheming otherworldly manipulator who maneuvers his enemies into defeating themselves that emerged in seasons 25 and 26 was referenced (most explicitly by Uncle Terry in the Doctor&#8217;s interaction with the Hitlerwyrm) but not really showcased. Not so in this story; throughout the book, Ace is bounced from temporal gambit to preset situation by both the Doctor and the Timewyrm. All of the supporting players are there for a purpose, chosen by either the Timewyrm or the Doctor for maximum tactical advantage.</p>
<p>Cornell sets up the symmetries between the two manipulators beautifully. The Timewyrm is the consummate user; she uses Ace&#8217;s childhood fears in the form of tormenting bully Chad Boyle and her adolescent fears in the form of recent enemy Rupert Hemmings, the suave British Nazi from <i>Timewrym: Exodus</i>. She takes one of the Doctor&#8217;s home bases on Earth, a sleepy village called Cheldon Boniface, and converts it into an energy source for her ascendancy into godhood. She takes everything within sight and twists it, drains it and discards it. The Doctor, by contrast, leaves notes and clues to guide his helpers along. He enlists the aid of a latent psychic and a sentient church* but allows them to figure out what he needs them to do and, even more critically, allows them to decide whether they will do it or not. The Doctor is not above coercion but you always have an out with him. This crucial difference underscores their conflict nicely and, when the Doctor does finally triumph, he does so in such a Whoish way that the long-standing fan has to fight the urge to jump up and applaud.</p>
<p>Cornell gives fans of the manipulative Doctor a special treat in the form of a coda showing the Doctor and Ace setting up the tricks and tips that helped them carry the day. All of this was hand-waved in the television series; explicitly showing it here does more to redeem some of the gaping plots in seasons 25 and 26 than years of rec.arts.drwho fan theories.</p>
<p>Four books in and the Virgin line has produced its first stone cold classic. Where could the line go from here?</p>
<p><em><span style="font-size:85%;">* Cornell&#8217;s major weakness is an unfortunate tendency towards teeth-grindingly twee bullshit. We will see more of this in later books.</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/wedge/2004/08/who-reviews-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WHO REVIEWS: #3</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/wedge/2004/07/who-reviews-3/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/wedge/2004/07/who-reviews-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 01:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/wedge/2004/07/who-reviews-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Timewyrm: &#8211; Apocalypse &#8211; Nigel Robinson (3/10)   (TARDIS crew: 7th, Ace; VILLAIN: The Timewyrm, The Panjistri) The third installment of the Timewyrm series was written by another Target novelization alum whose previous efforts focused on translating 1st and 2nd Doctor stories from the screen to the page. I did not know this when I first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em><a href="http://www.timelash.com/tardis/display.asp?db=na&#038;id=3" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.timelash.com/tardis/display.asp?db=na_038_id=3&amp;referer=');">Timewyrm: &#8211; Apocalypse</A></em> &#8211; Nigel Robinson</strong> (3/10)<br />
  (TARDIS crew: 7th, Ace; VILLAIN: The Timewyrm, The Panjistri)</p>
<p>The third installment of the Timewyrm series was written by another Target novelization alum whose previous efforts focused on translating 1st and 2nd Doctor stories from the screen to the page. I did not know this when I first read this book, otherwise I would not have been surprised by the immature prose manfully struggling to tell a story that is a thinly-veiled reworking of an obscure 2nd Doctor story (&#8220;The Krotons&#8221;, featuring Jamie and Zoe). </p>
<p>The saving grace of this book is that the plot is entertaining; The Doctor and Ace track the Timewyrm to the edge of the universe, discovering an idyllic paradise populated by the staggeringly gorgeous Kirithons and their aloof masters, the benevolent and mysterious Panjistri. The Panjistri nurture and protect the Kirithons, encouraging those who rise to the tops of their chosen professions/vocations to join the Brotherhood of Kandasi (at which point their essences are melted into a gigantic God machine and their physical remains are pureed into the staple of the Kirithon diet and facilitates the removal of the assimilated individuals from the collective memories of the Kirithon colony; oh, also anyone who finds out what&#8217;s really going on gets turned into a hideous mutant and banished into the poisoned lands). Naturally, things are beginning to fall apart just as The Doctor and Ace arise and it falls to them to thwart the Panjistris&#8217; plot&#8230; BUT THERE&#8217;S A CATCH!</p>
<p>I have to stop recapping for a moment because the story moves from &#8220;good&#8221; entertaining to &#8220;holy shit, are we really supposed to buy this nonsense&#8221; entertaining. </p>
<p>I mean, for fuck&#8217;s sake!</p>
<p>Okay, I&#8217;m ready.</p>
<p>Robinson wants us to believe that Ace is the embodiment of rage and anger and dumping her into the God Machine will keep the universe from collapsing back upon itself (yes, this is a sequel to &#8220;Logopolis&#8221;!). At this point the book would have to turn into a sex kitten covered with money and hard candy to have any chance of redeeming itself in my eyes. Characters get offed left and right as the book builds to the world&#8217;s most blatantly-obvious self-sacrifice and I&#8217;m just in hysterics. Blah blah blah, the Timewyrm is revealed (and it&#8217;s not at all shocking) and the book ends with Ace and the Doctor chasing after her again.</p>
<p>There are 229 original Who novels; based on this book, it&#8217;s a miracle that 226 of them ever saw publication. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/wedge/2004/07/who-reviews-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WHO REVIEWS: #1 and #2</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/wedge/2004/07/who-reviews-1-and-2/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/wedge/2004/07/who-reviews-1-and-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 04:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/wedge/2004/07/who-reviews-1-and-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Timewyrm: Genesys &#8211; John Peel (7/10)   (TARDIS crew: 7th, Ace; VILLIAN: The Timewyrm n&#8217;e Ishtar n&#8217;e Qataka) Timewyrm: Exodus &#8211; Terrance Dicks (7/10)   (TARDIS crew: 7th, Ace; VILLIAN: The Timewyrm, Hitler) Virgin Books decided to launch their line of Doctor Who fiction with a maxi-story that spans the first four novels. In the forward for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em><a href="http://www.timelash.com/tardis/display.asp?db=na&#038;id=1" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.timelash.com/tardis/display.asp?db=na_038_id=1&amp;referer=');">Timewyrm: Genesys</a></em> &#8211; John Peel</strong> (7/10)<br />
  (TARDIS crew: 7th, Ace; VILLIAN: The Timewyrm <EM>n&#8217;e</EM> Ishtar <EM>n&#8217;e</EM> Qataka)<br />
<strong><em><a href="http://www.timelash.com/tardis/display.asp?range=na&#038;id=2" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.timelash.com/tardis/display.asp?range=na_038_id=2&amp;referer=');">Timewyrm: Exodus</a></em> &#8211; Terrance Dicks</strong> (7/10)<br />
  (TARDIS crew: 7th, Ace; VILLIAN: The Timewyrm, Hitler)</p>
<p>Virgin Books decided to launch their line of Doctor Who fiction with a maxi-story that spans the first four novels. In the forward for <em>Timewyrm: Genesys</em>, series editor Peter Darvill-Evans made many promises of &#8220;complex, challenging plots with serious themes&#8221; that &#8220;take full advantage of the scope offered by the medium of the novel&#8221;; apparently we the super-fanatical Whovians were not supposed to notice that the first two authors in this all-new shebang were the nigh-definitive Dalek historian (Peel) and the former series editor/king of the Target novelizations (Dicks). </p>
<p>The end result is that while the scope of the stories is greatly increased, the first two books themselves are comfortable, lightweight affairs that you can easily blow through in a weekend. Peel gives us a bawdy romp through Mesopotamia, complete with sword-wielding kings, bare-chested sex priestesses and a cybernetic alien that turns into the titular threat. Dicks&#8217; novel is a crash-course in Nazi history spun through the Doctor Who lens, touching on key events in the rise and fall of the Third Reich with The Doctor and Ace woven into the mix. Both borrow heavily from series continuity, referencing moments from every era of Doctor Who (I assume consciously, as both novels base their stories in history), often to the point where it&#8217;s patently obvious that these books are written by men obsessed with a kid&#8217;s show for people obsessed with a kid&#8217;s show. </p>
<p>Two books in, the New Adventures look a lot like the old adventures with added boobies and beatings. The beginning of the line fails in terms of being a bold, exciting new direction for the Doctor Who franchise, but succeeds in that both books are very enjoyable to read. Peel hasn&#8217;t written another Who story with as many laugh-out-loud moments as he has in <em>Genesys</em>, between the sheer bull-headedness of his Gilgamesh and the extreme culture clash between Ace and 2700 BC, while Dicks came out of the gate with what is arguably the best original novel he wrote for the series, admirably walking a fine tightrope of merging the absurdity of the series&#8217; premise with the deadly serious, horrific circumstances of Hitler&#8217;s reign mixed in with some chilling &#8220;what if?&#8221; scenarios that echo the greatest moments in the televised series. I can&#8217;t fault either of these books for not being the wildly-exciting departures from the norm described by Darvill-Evans because, well, they&#8217;re so damned <em>fun</em>. </p>
<p>(Enjoy it while you can; things take a very sharp turn into &#8220;not-fun&#8221; territory after the Timewyrm series wraps up.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/wedge/2004/07/who-reviews-1-and-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OOOH WEEE OOOOOOH&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/wedge/2004/07/oooh-weee-ooooooh/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/wedge/2004/07/oooh-weee-ooooooh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 23:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/wedge/2004/07/oooh-weee-ooooooh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OOOH WEEE OOOOOOH&#8230; In 1991, Virgin Publishing launched a line of original Doctor Who fiction. Continuing where &#8220;Survival&#8221; left off, the book range followed the further adventures of the seventh Doctor and Ace, building onto the Doctor Who universe in whatever ways the authors could imagine and telling stories of a breadth and scope impossible [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>OOOH WEEE OOOOOOH&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In 1991, Virgin Publishing launched a line of original Doctor Who fiction. Continuing where &#8220;Survival&#8221; left off, the book range followed the further adventures of the seventh Doctor and Ace, building onto the Doctor Who universe in whatever ways the authors could imagine and telling stories of a breadth and scope impossible for the television show. The line was so successful that Virgin launched a companion line of &#8220;Missing Adventure&#8221; stories in 1994 featuring Doctors 1 through 6 and their various companions. Fans starved for new Who stories that were tackling more adult themes and modern storytelling techniques made the line such a success that, after the 1996 television movie, the BBC bought back the novel rights and started their own line of new Who fiction starring the eighth Doctor and a new group of companions. To this day, BBC Books publishes a new Who novel every month, coming up with new and entertaining ways of putting the universe and the Doctor through the wringer.</p>
<p>The novels have done a lot to not only add depth and richness to the Whoniverse, but also to cement the Doctor&#8217;s place as one of the great science-fiction heroes of modern storytelling. To date, between the Virgin line and the BBC line there are have been 229 novels of original, canonical Who fiction published in the past 13 years.</p>
<p>I own 220 of them. I intend to review all of them, in chronological order, on this blog.</p>
<p><strong>THERE IS NO ESCAPE.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/wedge/2004/07/oooh-weee-ooooooh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE PRODIGY &#8211; &#8220;Girls&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/07/the-prodigy-girls/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/07/the-prodigy-girls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2004/07/the-prodigy-girls/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THE PRODIGY &#8211; &#8220;Girls&#8221; You know how you&#8217;ll sometimes be listening to some nu-electro track and the thought will cross your mind that this would be the GREATEST THING EVAH if only it had a smidgeon of bass in it? Apparently Liam Howlett&#8217;s been thinking the same thing; this bouncy little number is the strongest [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>THE PRODIGY &#8211; &#8220;Girls&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>You know how you&#8217;ll sometimes be listening to some nu-electro track and the thought will cross your mind that this would be the GREATEST THING EVAH if only it had a smidgeon of bass in it? Apparently Liam Howlett&#8217;s been thinking the same thing; this bouncy little number is the strongest thing he&#8217;s put out since &#8220;No Good (Start The Dance)&#8221; and shamelessly prances along the line between pandering nostalgia fluff and fuck-you-in-the-eye bassbin bludgeon. The merry melodies and swirling synths paired over the deafening drums make me awfully abuse alliteration. </p>
<p>Now, if you&#8217;ll excuse me, I have a whole lot of unironic cabbage-patching to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/07/the-prodigy-girls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JANET JACKSON</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/06/janet-jackson/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/06/janet-jackson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 01:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2004/06/janet-jackson/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JANET JACKSON &#8211; &#8220;All Nite (Don&#8217;t Stop)&#8221; It&#8217;s official; Janet Jackson is crazy. This has nothing to do with her alleged exercise addiction, the plastic surgeies she&#8217;s had to make herself look like the world&#8217;s sexiest anthropomorphic cat, or even the Superbowl titflash-o-rama. This is all centered around her new single, a deeply sexy affair [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.janet-jackson.com" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.janet-jackson.com?referer=');">JANET JACKSON</a> &#8211; &#8220;All Nite (Don&#8217;t Stop)&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s official; Janet Jackson is crazy.</p>
<p>This has nothing to do with her alleged exercise addiction, the plastic surgeies she&#8217;s had to make herself look like the world&#8217;s sexiest anthropomorphic cat, or even the Superbowl titflash-o-rama.  This is all centered around her new single, a deeply sexy affair that weaves a gigantic bassline through a stutter-beat straight from the heavens, topped off with the most gorgeous whisper-voiced lyrics this side of the &#8220;let me throw my panties at you and call you Daddy&#8221; divide.  The evidence of Janet&#8217;s (or perhaps her record label&#8217;s) advancing dementia is the fact that this was not the lead single off of <em><strong>Damita Jo</strong></em>.</p>
<p><em>(EDITOR&#8217;S NOTE: This review is in no way influenced by the fact that the author first heard the song via the absurdly sexy video.  Oh no.)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/06/janet-jackson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ORBITAL &#8211; &#8220;You Lot&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/05/orbital-you-lot/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/05/orbital-you-lot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 23:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2004/05/orbital-you-lot/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ORBITAL &#8211; &#8220;You Lot&#8221; Simplicity is oftentimes a great thing. Layered synth lines over a straightforward beat carries the listener into an extended sample of a speech about taking over the world via science (I have no idea where this comes from, by the way, so please tell me because it sounds like it&#8217;s from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ORBITAL &#8211; &#8220;You Lot&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Simplicity is oftentimes a great thing.  Layered synth lines over a straightforward beat carries the listener into an extended sample of a speech about taking over the world via science (I have no idea where this comes from, by the way, so please tell me because it sounds like it&#8217;s from Blake&#8217;s 7 or something similar) before saying, &#8220;Oh yeah, right before I depressed the shit out of you, you were dancing; let&#8217;s go back to that.&#8221;  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve encountered an Orbital track that managed to work excess within the bounds of gentility before; I guess age does funny things to everyone.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/05/orbital-you-lot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BLACK EYED PEAS &#8211; &#8220;Hey Mama&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/10/black-eyed-peas-hey-mama/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/10/black-eyed-peas-hey-mama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2003/10/black-eyed-peas-hey-mama/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BLACK EYED PEAS &#8211; &#8220;Hey Mama&#8221; Dammit, it&#8217;s not like I didn&#8217;t have iPod envy as it is. The new ad campaign features silhouettes wearing iPods dancing to this song against a gigantic block of color. The ad is visually arresting, but the SONG! The energy alone is fantastic, propelling BEP firmly toward the forefront [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B>BLACK EYED PEAS &#8211; &#8220;Hey Mama&#8221;</B></p>
<p>Dammit, it&#8217;s not like I didn&#8217;t have iPod envy as it is.  The new ad campaign features silhouettes wearing iPods dancing to this song against a gigantic block of color.  The ad is visually arresting, but the SONG!  The energy alone is fantastic, propelling BEP firmly toward the forefront of the backpacker partyjam clique that they&#8217;ve inhabited since their major label debut.  There isn&#8217;t anything revolutionary here (beyond of course the addition of a female singer to their ranks, making me wonder if they were big fans of the first season of P. Diddy&#8217;s <I>Making The Band</I> and showing that the distance between the &#8220;conscious backpacker&#8221; and the &#8220;chart-topping playa&#8221; is about as far as the distance between Madonna and Britney at the last VMAs), but the simple fact of the matter is you don&#8217;t have to be revolutionary to get people amped.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/10/black-eyed-peas-hey-mama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JANET JACKSON &#8211; &#8220;Runaway&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/09/janet-jackson-runaway/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/09/janet-jackson-runaway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2003 22:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2003/09/janet-jackson-runaway/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JANET JACKSON &#8211; &#8220;Runaway&#8221; Everyone has a &#8220;dreary day&#8221; song; something that gets played on those days when you&#8217;re feeling down or slightly under the weather and you need a pick-me-up. This is one of the few songs Janet has recorded that panders to her gossamer-thin voice; any more muscle on the verses or chorus [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B>JANET JACKSON &#8211; &#8220;Runaway&#8221;</B></p>
<p>Everyone has a &#8220;dreary day&#8221; song; something that gets played on those days when you&#8217;re feeling down or slightly under the weather and you need a pick-me-up.  This is one of the few songs Janet has recorded that panders to her gossamer-thin voice; any more muscle on the verses or chorus would turn the shimmer into an insufferable bludgeoning mess.  Add to this the interweaving between the xylophone and sitar lines and the absolutely GORGEOUS backing harmonies (a wonderful duet between Janet and Pro Tools that uses the tinny reverb of mid 90s auto-tune to create the happiest choirbot in the world) and I can&#8217;t even remember the inconsequential thing that was weighing me down.</p>
<p><I>&#8220;Didn&#8217;t quite hit the note, that wasn&#8217;t such a good time&#8221;</I> Aw, come here and snuggle with me, you precious little thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/09/janet-jackson-runaway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DA BAND &#8211;  &#8220;Bad Boy This, Bad Boy That&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/09/da-band-bad-boy-this-bad-boy-that/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/09/da-band-bad-boy-this-bad-boy-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2003 15:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2003/09/da-band-bad-boy-this-bad-boy-that/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DA BAND &#8211; &#8220;Bad Boy This, Bad Boy That&#8221; Imagine you are an R&#038;B singer. Imagine that you&#8217;ve been trying for a while to get your big break and have had limited success, but haven&#8217;t really blown up the way you&#8217;d like to. Imagine that you discover that &#8220;Making The Band 2&#8243; will feature auditions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B>DA BAND &#8211;  &#8220;Bad Boy This, Bad Boy That&#8221;</B></p>
<p>Imagine you are an R&#038;B singer.  Imagine that you&#8217;ve been trying for a while to get your big break and have had limited success, but haven&#8217;t really blown up the way you&#8217;d like to.  Imagine that you discover that &#8220;Making The Band 2&#8243; will feature auditions for a new hip-hop group on Bad Boy Records, a group whose career will be managed by P. Diddy himself.  Imagine leaving your husband and child behind and auditioning for the show.  Imagine getting into the group!  </p>
<p>Imagine realizing that you&#8217;re going to be stuck in a house away from your family for several months while your group records its first album.  Imagine getting caught in the middle of a ton of fights between immature alpha males jockeying for top position within the group and the ever-present spectre of your domineering husband.   Imagine being asked to sing like Ashanti, Beyonce, Mary J Blige, [insert hot female singer of the day here, except of course Lumidee because everyone knows baby couldn't carry a tune in a paper bag].  Imagine getting dumped on by the other woman in the group because she sees your role solely as &#8220;singing the hook&#8221;.  Imagine finding out that your group&#8217;s kickoff single doesn&#8217;t even have you on it.</p>
<p>Thank God they picked such a hot song to kick things off, otherwise you might start to think that all of the stress and drama wasn&#8217;t worth it.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/09/da-band-bad-boy-this-bad-boy-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE &#8211; &#8220;Senorita&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/08/justin-timberlake-senorita/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/08/justin-timberlake-senorita/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2003/08/justin-timberlake-senorita/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE &#8211; &#8220;Senorita&#8221; I&#8217;m kind of at a loss for words here. I&#8217;ve made ripping JT into one of my favorite online activities, but now I&#8217;m presented with a song that minimizes the things I hate about his singing (the overabuse of his nasal tone being the top culprit) combined with the hottest Neptunes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B>JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE &#8211; &#8220;Senorita&#8221;</B></p>
<p>I&#8217;m kind of at a loss for words here.  I&#8217;ve made ripping JT into one of my favorite online activities, but now I&#8217;m presented with a song that minimizes the things I hate about his singing (the overabuse of his nasal tone being the top culprit) combined with the hottest Neptunes beat since &#8220;When The Last Time&#8221; and a tune that I actually want to sing along with.  Sure, he tosses a bone to my hateful core by including a woefully dire call-and-response section near the end, but the damage is done by that point; any gorge that rises at that point is swept away by the summery breeziness off the preceding three minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/08/justin-timberlake-senorita/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ALBUM REVIEW: Poem-Cees &#8211;</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/05/album-review-poem-cees/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/05/album-review-poem-cees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2003 01:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2003/05/album-review-poem-cees/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ALBUM REVIEW: Poem-Cees &#8211; PARANOIA I put the headphones on and lean back. Jagged guitar assaults my ears and fear grips me as I hear the harrowing opening litany. THEY ARE OUT TO GET ME. The beat kicks in. We&#8217;re in party mode, but things are still unsettled. I can&#8217;t find the bling, only corrupt [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B>ALBUM REVIEW: Poem-Cees &#8211; <i>PARANOIA</I></B></p>
<p>I put the headphones on and lean back. Jagged guitar assaults my ears and fear grips me as I hear the harrowing opening litany. THEY ARE OUT TO GET ME.<br />
The beat kicks in. We&#8217;re in party mode, but things are still unsettled. I can&#8217;t find the bling, only corrupt cops and incompetent middle management. They tell me I can&#8217;t see, but I&#8217;m trying.</p>
<p>Children playing forms the background for child abuse while the world&#8217;s most shimmery keyboard patch puts a glossy, confectionery coating on getting to close to the seedy streets. I&#8217;m remided of all the things I need to fear again, but I nod my head to the rugged drums and shout along: &#8220;WE AIN&#8217;T SCARED OF YOU!&#8221;</p>
<p>A tender case of commitement jitters turns into all-out mad-dog frothing over blatant infidelities. This in turn takes us to a mythical land where every lady is a little bit mocha, a little bit latte and a whole lot of DAMN! (Of course, we have to look over our shoulders to make sure the female friends can&#8217;t see us rubber-necking.)</p>
<p>The storm clouds brew again as the POWERS THAT BE breathe down our necks and pull our strings; Joe Theisman to the rescue! At the end all I can say is &#8220;blah blah blah&#8221;; I&#8217;m completely spent.</p>
<p>Hands shaking, I take the headphones off, wipe the sweat from my brow, and press play again. It&#8217;s just that good.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let this album pass you by; you can&#8217;t afford not to hear it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/05/album-review-poem-cees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CHRISTINA AGUILERA &#8211; &#8220;Soar&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/03/christina-aguilera-soar/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/03/christina-aguilera-soar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2003 20:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2003/03/christina-aguilera-soar/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CHRISTINA AGUILERA &#8211; &#8220;Soar&#8221; Okay, yes, it&#8217;s a cheesy motivational ballad. Anyone with a strong reaction to the Dianne Warren school of songwriting should just check out right now because I could type for several years and not change your mind one little bit. The rest of us will be completely grooving on this song, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B>CHRISTINA AGUILERA &#8211; &#8220;Soar&#8221;</B></p>
<p>Okay, yes, it&#8217;s a cheesy motivational ballad.  Anyone with a strong reaction to the Dianne Warren school of songwriting should just check out right now because I could type for several years and not change your mind one little bit.</p>
<p>The rest of us will be completely grooving on this song, though.  There&#8217;s this odd phenomenon I&#8217;m noticing with the songs from _Stripped_; the songs fit <I>too</i> well together on the album, to the point where outside of a few exceptions, the become a shapeless blur of Xtina-song.  Played individually outside of the context of the album, they&#8217;re all arresting and beautiful.  This song in particular has an amazing bridge that leads into an absolutely stellar vamp section with full-on gospel choir, hand clapping, violins and acoustic guitars, and an F# that&#8217;s the best high note I&#8217;ve heard on a pop song since early Mariah rocked out on that B in &#8220;Vision of Love&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/03/christina-aguilera-soar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JOHN MAYER &#8212; &#8216;Your Body Is a Wonderland&#8217; (redirect for the prosecution)</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/01/john-mayer-%ef%bf%bd-%ef%bf%bdyour-body-is-a-wonderland%ef%bf%bd/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/01/john-mayer-%ef%bf%bd-%ef%bf%bdyour-body-is-a-wonderland%ef%bf%bd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2003 18:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2003/01/john-mayer-%ef%bf%bd-%ef%bf%bdyour-body-is-a-wonderland%ef%bf%bd/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If he&#8217;s so full of poetic wonder and awe, why does he sing these lyrics like he&#8217;s reading an encyclopedia? What woman is going to be flattered by having lecherous lyrics unemotionally intoned at her by someone who gives the impression that they&#8217;d rather be watching football than sing to her as she stretches out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he&#8217;s so full of poetic wonder and awe, why does he sing <a href="http://www.leoslyrics.com/listlyrics.php?sid=%EF%F2%D1%B8%DB%C7%D5%B5" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.leoslyrics.com/listlyrics.php?sid=_EF_F2_D1_B8_DB_C7_D5_B5&amp;referer=');">these lyrics</a> like he&#8217;s reading an encyclopedia?  What woman is going to be flattered by having lecherous lyrics unemotionally intoned at her by someone who gives the impression that they&#8217;d rather be watching football than sing to her as she stretches out naked on the bed before him?</p>
<p>(Further discussion should probably happen in the comments or on <a href="http://www.ilxor.com" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.ilxor.com?referer=');">ILXOR</a>, I&#8217;m guessing.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/01/john-mayer-%ef%bf%bd-%ef%bf%bdyour-body-is-a-wonderland%ef%bf%bd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JOHN MAYER &#8211; &#8220;Your Body Is A Wonderland&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/01/john-mayer-your-body-is-a-wonderland/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/01/john-mayer-your-body-is-a-wonderland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2003 15:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2003/01/john-mayer-your-body-is-a-wonderland/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JOHN MAYER &#8211; &#8220;Your Body Is A Wonderland&#8221; I decided this morning that i would take on the following challenge; I&#8217;d pick a song I didn&#8217;t particularly like and write about it without going off on a ranting screed. Dear readers, if only you knew how hard this is for me! Even now, I sit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B>JOHN MAYER &#8211; &#8220;Your Body Is A Wonderland&#8221;</B></p>
<p>I decided this morning that i would take on the following challenge; I&#8217;d pick a song I didn&#8217;t particularly like and write about it without going off on a ranting screed.  Dear readers, if only you knew how hard this is for me!  Even now, I sit here with finger trembling, every nerve in my body aching to type invective and derision as if I was psyching myself up for a pit fight.  But NO I SHALL NOT SUCCUMB.</p>
<p>So, this song has been making its way up the top 40 for some time now.  What can you really say about it?  John Mayer has a passable singing voice, I guess; he doesn&#8217;t hit any wrong notes, even though his nasal burr is slightly less soothing than having porcupine quills lovingly stuck in you arms by an evil witch- WOAH I am breaking my rules.  Let&#8217;s try this again.</p>
<p>To Mr. John Mayer:  Really, would it have killed you to invest some energy in the song?  From what I can tell, the fact that this lovely lady&#8217;s body is a wonderland laid out for your enjoyment excites you as much as looking up the oil company in the phone book.  Everything about the song screams &#8220;safe middlebrow music&#8221;.  There&#8217;s no bite, no hook, no ANYTHING for the listener to engage with besides vaguely pleasant, forgettable guitar and vaguely unpleasant, forgettable singing.  I can&#8217;t tell you how many times I&#8217;ve heard this song, partially because they play it to death on Boston morning radio (and BOY do I regret that our bathroom radio is stuck on KISS 108), but mostly because despite the countless times I&#8217;ve heard it, I only have a vague recollection of how it goes.  All I really remember is deep irritation and pain while it&#8217;s playing; once it&#8217;s over, I find myself somewhat puzzled as to why I was so irritated.  Perhaps I should give the song points for giving some insight into what it&#8217;s like to live the life of the main character of &#8220;Memento&#8221;, but I&#8217;d much rather hope and pray that I never ever ever ever ever ever ever EVER had to hear it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2003/01/john-mayer-your-body-is-a-wonderland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Things I&#8217;ve learned by listening to</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/12/things-ive-learned-by-listening-to/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/12/things-ive-learned-by-listening-to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2002/12/things-ive-learned-by-listening-to/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Things I&#8217;ve learned by listening to AT40 with my wife:- Dirty songs sound better when you hear them on the way to church (&#8220;Girl Talk&#8221;, &#8220;Dirrty&#8221;).- Creed has no redeeming features whatsoever (this was more confirmation rather than something new).- The right lyrics can win someone over to a musical style that is normally avoided [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B>Things I&#8217;ve learned by listening to <a href="http://www.rick.com/top40chart.html" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.rick.com/top40chart.html?referer=');">AT40</a> with my wife:</B><P>- Dirty songs sound better when you hear them on the way to church (&#8220;Girl Talk&#8221;, &#8220;Dirrty&#8221;).<BR>- Creed has no redeeming features whatsoever (this was more confirmation rather than something new).<BR>- The right lyrics can win someone over to a musical style that is normally avoided by the plague, even if it is only for that song (&#8220;Lifestyles Of The Rich And Famous&#8221;)<BR>- Kid Rock is a better singer than Eminem AND Sheryl Crow.<BR>- Kelly Clarkson may be the sweetest girl on the face of the earth, but &#8220;A Moment Like This&#8221; needs to GO GO GO GO GO.<BR>- Despite the best attempts of marketing geniuses across the country, Americans like Kelly more than Beyonce.  AS THEY SHOULD.<BR>- Mariah Carey is still enough of a star to get pity airplay.<BR>- Nelly has completely lost it.  I really hope he&#8217;s invested well.<BR>- Avril Levigne should stick to ballads.<BR>- One of the guys in The Calling left that band to join his brother&#8217;s band, Lifehouse.  Sonic similarities between the two begin to make sense.<BR>- Madonna needed to go all creepy-robot-alien to get another top 10 hit.  God bless her.<BR>O-Town have turned recycling Backstreet Boys material into a science.<BR>- If people really understood how impressive it is when Michelle Branch floats the &#8220;WHYYYY-Y-Y-Y&#8221; part of &#8220;The Game Of Love&#8221; so effortlessly, there&#8217;d be a lot less criticism of her. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/12/things-ive-learned-by-listening-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BLUR &#8211; &#8220;Don&#8217;t Drop The Bomb When You&#8217;re The Bomb&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/12/blur-dont-drop-the-bomb-when-youre-the-bomb/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/12/blur-dont-drop-the-bomb-when-youre-the-bomb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2002 17:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2002/12/blur-dont-drop-the-bomb-when-youre-the-bomb/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BLUR &#8211; &#8220;Don&#8217;t Drop The Bomb When You&#8217;re The Bomb&#8221;Hmm. It&#8217;s not electro, it&#8217;s not indie rock, it&#8217;s not house, it&#8217;s not pop, it&#8217;s not coherent or consistent, it&#8217;s not techno; I could probably go on and on listing all of the things this odd little white-label release isn&#8217;t. Tons and tons of people are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B>BLUR &#8211; &#8220;Don&#8217;t Drop The Bomb When You&#8217;re The Bomb&#8221;</B><P>Hmm.  It&#8217;s not electro, it&#8217;s not indie rock, it&#8217;s not house, it&#8217;s not pop, it&#8217;s not coherent or consistent, it&#8217;s not techno; I could probably go on and on listing all of the things this odd little white-label release isn&#8217;t.  Tons and tons of people are going to hate it because, well, it&#8217;s bizarre.  All it really is is a loud bass note repeated for three minutes while various sound effects and drum patterns drop in and out.  Of course, I think it&#8217;s fantastic; the world needs more of this type of dubby, droney rhythm-fuck nonsense, particularly from the artists who have &#8220;made it&#8221;.  Damon Albarn may be irritating beyond belief but I fully support his efforts to capture the sound of paranoid schizophrenia on DAT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/12/blur-dont-drop-the-bomb-when-youre-the-bomb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JENNIFER LOPEZ FEATURING JADAKISS &amp; STYLES &#8211; &#8220;Jenny From The Block&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/11/jennifer-lopez-featuring-jadakiss-styles-jenny-from-the-block/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/11/jennifer-lopez-featuring-jadakiss-styles-jenny-from-the-block/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2002 22:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2002/11/jennifer-lopez-featuring-jadakiss-styles-jenny-from-the-block/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JENNIFER LOPEZ FEATURING JADAKISS &#038; STYLES &#8211; &#8220;Jenny From The Block&#8221; OH FOR FUCK&#8217;S SAKE SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>JENNIFER LOPEZ FEATURING JADAKISS &#038; STYLES &#8211; &#8220;Jenny From The Block&#8221;</B>
<p>OH FOR FUCK&#8217;S SAKE SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/11/jennifer-lopez-featuring-jadakiss-styles-jenny-from-the-block/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OMNI TRIO &#8211; &#8220;Step Off&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/10/omni-trio-step-off/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/10/omni-trio-step-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2002 20:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2002/10/omni-trio-step-off/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OMNI TRIO &#8211; &#8220;Step Off&#8221;I&#8217;ve been in a time warp for the past week. Yes, this year has been brilliant, Ludicrus is mighty, Missy knocked out the box, Kelly Rowland&#8217;s solo single is mint, The Clipse are excellent, blah blah blah blah; I&#8217;ve spent the past two days at work going off my nut to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B>OMNI TRIO &#8211; &#8220;Step Off&#8221;</B><P>I&#8217;ve been in a time warp for the past week.  Yes, this year has been brilliant, Ludicrus is mighty, Missy knocked out the box, Kelly Rowland&#8217;s solo single is mint, The Clipse are excellent, blah blah blah blah; I&#8217;ve spent the past two days at work going off my nut to the &#8220;Mystic Stepper&#8221; EP and remembering those grand college days when my main requirements for music were a storming breakbeat and sine-wave synth lines mixed in with chipmunk samples and big thumping fuck-off bass lines.  I really wanted tracks like this to take over the world; screw melody, screw harmonic structure, just give me some bangin&#8217; thematic sections sequenced together based on a &#8220;maximize-the-boogie&#8221; algorithm, supported by a stuttering, syncopated beat chopped up and shredded until it&#8217;s barely recognizable.  Big beat started us down this road, but forgot its roots and got all melodic and songy.  Where is the legacy promised by Omni Trio, Acen, early Prodigy, Altern8, Sonz of a Loop da Loop Era, D&#8217;Cruze, Boogie Times Tribe, Austin, Blame, 2 Bad Mice, early 4 Hero, Cloud 9, Hyper-On Experience, Yolk, Krome and Time, The House Crew, and all those other greats?  Who&#8217;s got the tempos to go with the bleeps to go with the riddims?  I must be officially old because I want my golden age back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/10/omni-trio-step-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UNDERWORLD &#8211; &#8220;Two Months Off&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/06/underworld-two-months-off/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/06/underworld-two-months-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2002 17:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2002/06/underworld-two-months-off/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UNDERWORLD &#8211; &#8220;Two Months Off&#8221;Darren Emerson may not be in Underworld anymore, but he&#8217;s certainly left his mark. At the beginning, a moody up-tempo shuffle beat swings its way underneath a sampled monlogue of a woman talking some nonsense about things a lovesick schoolgirl has scrawled onto the back of a notebook. This leads into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B>UNDERWORLD &#8211; &#8220;Two Months Off&#8221;</B><P>Darren Emerson may not be in Underworld anymore, but he&#8217;s certainly left his mark.  At the beginning, a moody up-tempo shuffle beat swings its way underneath a sampled monlogue of a woman talking some nonsense about things a lovesick schoolgirl has scrawled onto the back of a notebook.  This leads into some uplifting warm synth stabs, all mixed in with ethereal swirls and chanted uplifting lyrics about bringing light into the dark places.  At the end of the day this is enough for me, but when the cowbell kicks in it just becomes the best song ever.  I&#8217;ve spent several days dancing in my chair at work to this.  It&#8217;s even better than &#8220;Kittens&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/06/underworld-two-months-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TRUTH HURTS feat. RAKIM &#8211; &#8220;Addictive&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/06/truth-hurts-feat-rakim-addictive/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/06/truth-hurts-feat-rakim-addictive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2002 15:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2002/06/truth-hurts-feat-rakim-addictive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TRUTH HURTS feat. RAKIM &#8211; &#8220;Addictive&#8221; I&#8217;ve tried to write this entry three times now without success. I can&#8217;t figure out why this song is so alluring to me. Part of it may be DJ Quik&#8217;s beat; yeah, it&#8217;s the logical extension of &#8220;Oochie Wally&#8221;, but the way the singer&#8217;s voice supports the flute riffs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B>TRUTH HURTS feat. RAKIM &#8211; &#8220;Addictive&#8221;</B>  <P>I&#8217;ve tried to write this entry three times now without success.  I can&#8217;t figure out why this song is so alluring to me.  Part of it may be DJ Quik&#8217;s beat; yeah, it&#8217;s the logical extension of &#8220;Oochie Wally&#8221;, but the way the singer&#8217;s voice supports the flute riffs makes it so much more.  Truth herself sounds a lot like Mary J. Blige before the drugs and alcohol left a mark on her voice.  The chorus is irresistable. (&#8220;He&#8217;s so contagious/He turns my pages&#8221;; how can you deny that?)  Rakim&#8217;s rap is butter.  The overall GROOVE is just massive.  I was listening to this on the radio in the car today and I just wanted to roll down the windows, bump the Indian funk and nod my head like a madman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/06/truth-hurts-feat-rakim-addictive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michelle Golberg, I hate you</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/06/michelle-golberg-i-hate-you/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/06/michelle-golberg-i-hate-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2002 21:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2002/06/michelle-golberg-i-hate-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michelle Golberg, I hate you: Thank you so much for taking a perfectly harmless album and making it sound like distilled aural anathema for anyone who&#8217;s paid attention to dance music for the past ten years. You get bonus hate points for the most willful misreading of Massive Attack ever committed to print.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B><a href="http://salon.com/ent/music/feature/2002/06/04/moby/index.html" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/salon.com/ent/music/feature/2002/06/04/moby/index.html?referer=');">Michelle Golberg, I hate you</a>:</B>  Thank you so much for taking a perfectly harmless album and making it sound like distilled aural anathema for anyone who&#8217;s paid attention to dance music for the past ten years.  You get bonus hate points for the most willful misreading of Massive Attack ever committed to print.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/06/michelle-golberg-i-hate-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MICHEL&#8217;LE &#8211; &#8220;No More Lies&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/05/michelle-no-more-lies/</link>
		<comments>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/05/michelle-no-more-lies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2002 18:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/nylpm/2002/05/michelle-no-more-lies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MICHEL&#8217;LE &#8211; &#8220;No More Lies&#8221;I was flipping channels this morning while getting ready for work and stumbled across this 80s gem on MTV Jams. Suddenly, I was 16 years old again, dancing in the family room with dad&#8217;s stereo turned all the way up with my friends. I&#8217;d never actually seen Michel&#8217;le before; all I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B>MICHEL&#8217;LE &#8211; &#8220;No More Lies&#8221;</B><P>I was flipping channels this morning while getting ready for work and stumbled across this 80s gem on MTV Jams.  Suddenly, I was 16 years old again, dancing in the family room with dad&#8217;s stereo turned all the way up with my friends.  I&#8217;d never actually <I>seen</i> Michel&#8217;le before; all I knew of her was that her singing voice was lower than her speaking voice (think Miss Stush on helium).  Man, she was <B>FOINE!</B>  Baby ought to thank her mama for a butt like that. (wait, that&#8217;s a different song&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2002/05/michelle-no-more-lies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

